Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Maybe we can make this Sticky?? Have a comparison against other GTR's with mods or in stock form.

Got my car dyno'd today, after fitting the PFC & Cam Gears, here's the result & my list of mods.

MODS: GTR Series 3 98model

Power FC & Hand Controller

Cam Gears (Settings +4 & -6)

Stock Turbos (14psi ~<1bar)

Turbosmart bleed valve

Exhaust - stock dumps, 2.5 front pipe into 3inch, stock Cat, 3" from cat back

HKS Pods (No CAI)

Total 249.1kw @ ALL FOUR WHEELS

Thanks to:

1. boys at ICE for help & advice

2. Merli from SAU for letting me know it's kw@all four wheels, & not rwkw.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

'95 Series 1 GTR

  • Apexi Front pipe, 3" Cat, 3.5" Catback
  • Standard turbos and 'cooler
  • Boost @ 1.0 bar (Blitz Dual SBC)
  • Power FC
  • HKS pods

234.8kw at the rears

So, theoretically, with cam gears i should get a 15kw increase.. that sounds about right.

dyno.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616575
Share on other sites

If you think these figures are overinflated, that's because they were done in RWD...

If the driveshafts were left in and the cars dyno'ed on a 4WD dyno, they would read about 20kw lower.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616584
Share on other sites

If you think these figures are overinflated, that's because they were done in RWD...

If the driveshafts were left in and the cars dyno'ed on a 4WD dyno, they would read about 20kw lower.

mine made 210kw at all 4 with same mods.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616593
Share on other sites

If you think these figures are overinflated, that's because they were done in RWD...

If the driveshafts were left in and the cars dyno'ed on a 4WD dyno, they would read about 20kw lower.

But a GTR is in rwd mod until traction is loss so in the real world that figure is probably correct, unless of course your doing 8K luanches :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616664
Share on other sites

that seems a bit high for stock turbos!

u should have used ben at race paces dyno it gives much more realistic dyno readings

Hi INASNT,

They're stock as they come.. The car will be at ICE later this week or next. I'm getting the HKS EVC IV fitted, & need new spark plugs.

If you think these figures are overinflated, that's because they were done in RWD...

If the driveshafts were left in and the cars dyno'ed on a 4WD dyno, they would read about 20kw lower.

Hi Merli,

The dyno was done in 4WD!! "shootout mode, I think??".. not 2WD. It was done at Subaru Docklands, in Victoria. In fact it hit around 265rwkw, but that's when we dropped the boost back.

Intersting my PFC Hand Controller, shows my knock levels to average around the 13mark, max I hit was 21... is this OK?

Thanks

meshmesh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616755
Share on other sites

But a GTR is in rwd mod until traction is loss so in the real world that figure is probably correct, unless of course your doing 8K luanches ;)

Yup... absolutely true...

That's why a GTR that spins up 250kw @ wheels will be faster than another RWD car that spins up 250kw @ wheels...

Because when you actually take them to the road, the GTR is making more than 250kw @ wheels :) :) :D :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616815
Share on other sites

The dyno was done in 4WD!! "shootout mode, I think??".. not 2WD. It was done at Subaru Docklands, in Victoria. In fact it hit around 265rwkw, but that's when we dropped the boost back.

Intersting my PFC Hand Controller, shows my knock levels to average around the 13mark, max I hit was 21... is this OK?

Sorry mate, you said in your first post (and this one): 249rwkw, which means "249 rear wheel kilowatts"... Got GTRs dyno'ed on an 4WD dyno, we usually say "249 kw @ all four" so we can differentiate ;) Hope that helps!

Excellent power figures for those mods! I think we all need to get some cam gears for our GTRs soon too! Did they make a big difference in spool up time as well as a good power increase?

Oh, and great choice on boost controller! Let us know how it goes and how it compares to the bleed valve!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616823
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...