Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi all

i recently swapped out my motor and bolted up a new turbo etc to go with, ecu, dyno tune etc etc. problem is, the car seems to lack midrange power. it makes plenty above 5000rpm, which is nice, but the turbo should really be making its power from 3500rpm.

R33 RB25DET standard

gcg hi-flow turbo

480cc injectors + pump

fmic

greddy copy plenum

3in split dump + gutted cat

3.5in cat back

ebc

splitfire coilpacks

ems stinger ecu with map sensor

post-40626-1263895041_thumb.jpg

my run is the highest blue line without dots. i plotted two lines (with dots) above that to show comparisons from other RB25s who are also running gcg hi-flows at 16-18psi.

as you can see, theyre making 25-40kw more than me in the midrange, but almost identical peak power. this is very irritating since the whole reason i chose that turbo was so the car would be more responsive!

im at a bit of a loss as to how i could be losing this power, so ill outline some possible weaknesses of my setup.

-ems stinger ecu. running batch injection and waste spark. i realise this is not perfect, but all the information ive read tells me this shouldnt be a major problem.

-small throttle. the intake piping to the throttle is 3in, but the factory throttle is only 2.5in. would this be a big restriction? doesnt seem to affect peak power...

-soft wastegate. with the ebc off, boost only gets up to about 10psi. but with the ebc on the dyno the car makes 18psi at 3600rpm so i doubt this is a problem.

-pod filter sucking engine bay air. im going to get some cold air into that soon.

-boost leaks. theres a few small ones i am aware of so im in the process of replacing silicone joints etc. despite making 18psi at 3600rpm, if small leaks force the turbo to work harder in the midrange, will keeping the wastegate closed longer restrict exhaust flow/power?

should i ask them to have another go at tuning it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304604-wheres-my-midrange/
Share on other sites

If you want more midrange for your setup i would get an adjustable cam gear. Does help a lot. Also an illegal way of gaining midrange power is removing the cat.

Without a cat my car makes 30rwkw more in the midrange!

*edit: just saw you have a gutted cat, replace it with a straight pipe with the cat shell welded on top.

Ok first of all you are right, that midrange for a GCG highflow is shit house, so you are correct that you need to find what is wrong.

Boost is coming on and holding fairly well, so it aint a boost/wastegate issue.

The thorttle aint the issue at all so don't worry about that.

And the pod sucking in hot ait also aint the problem so don't worry about that.

Have you ever had the timing belt off and replaced? If so are you sure the cams are dialled in correctly?

What piping do you have from the pod filter to the turbo? It aint sucking shut is it?

Edited by PM-R33

EMS makes me think there is a VCT issue, also tune could be a BIG thing.

my money is on the combination of both, so realistically its all tune related.. maybe put the stock ecu back in and have the EMS piggy back (to retain VCT etc)

random points, no particular order.

1. Tune, given the graph isn't all that smooth i wouldn't be surprised if it had a fair bit to do with it

2. Cam timing/belt could be off. Is VCT working?

3. Intake piping sucking shut

4. Cooler? What type?

5. You said boost leaks. If you are seeing 18psi @ the plenum AFTER boost leaks, you'll be making who knows what @ the turbo (eg 24psi). This could well be heating the air far to much.

6. Stock throttle body can flow 350rwkw+, so that's not a problem.

7. Drop the exhaust from before the CAT, just to see what happens (before/after dyno run)

8. You do need a better actuator. Personally i would be getting a 1bar/14psi actuator on there at some point.

1. post up your timing map, looks like there's crap all timing at low rpm

2. post up your A/F graph

I recommend adding more gain to your EBC @ 12PSI, the boost at 16PSI looks pretty good

R31Nismoid, don't think the intake pipe is sucking shut, you wouldn't get full boost all the way on the rev range.

I was thinking the VCT could be the issue aswell but it seems to be ok up until about 3500rpm, i would expect with the VCT not working at all that there would be a substantial power drop below 3500 aswell. Do EMS ecu's control VCT?

saying if it doesn't the power shouldn't look that bad.. I believe the tuner hasn't been bothered to tune the low/mid parts of the map..

Post up:

1. your timing map

2. your torque curve vs power/boost

off topic question, but can i ask, why did you upgrade the injectors to 480cc injectors? As far as i understand, standard ones are good for 230-40kw arent they? Or is that future mod, for more kw? just curious

they were on the plenum/fuel rail when i bought it second hand. also, yeah just a good upgrade to have up my sleeve.

Ok first of all you are right, that midrange for a GCG highflow is shit house, so you are correct that you need to find what is wrong.

Boost is coming on and holding fairly well, so it aint a boost/wastegate issue.

The thorttle aint the issue at all so don't worry about that.

And the pod sucking in hot ait also aint the problem so don't worry about that.

Have you ever had the timing belt off and replaced? If so are you sure the cams are dialled in correctly?

What piping do you have from the pod filter to the turbo? It aint sucking shut is it?

thanks for your input.

yes the timing belt and head gasket were replaced when i put this motor in. so thats a very good point, i will have to ask my tuner about that.

the suction pipe is the factory one, clamped onto a z32 afm which is not wired up since im using a map sensor.

off topic question, but can i ask, why did you upgrade the injectors to 480cc injectors? As far as i understand, standard ones are good for 230-40kw arent they? Or is that future mod, for more kw? just curious

Also interested to see the answer to this...

sorry this was a dud reply.

but i may as well use it to reanswer the injector question.

they were on the plenum/fuel rail/motor when i picked it up second hand.

and yeah, nice to have up my sleeve if i ever go for more power.

Edited by gt-ahhh!
random points, no particular order.

1. Tune, given the graph isn't all that smooth i wouldn't be surprised if it had a fair bit to do with it

2. Cam timing/belt could be off. Is VCT working?

3. Intake piping sucking shut

4. Cooler? What type?

5. You said boost leaks. If you are seeing 18psi @ the plenum AFTER boost leaks, you'll be making who knows what @ the turbo (eg 24psi). This could well be heating the air far to much.

6. Stock throttle body can flow 350rwkw+, so that's not a problem.

7. Drop the exhaust from before the CAT, just to see what happens (before/after dyno run)

8. You do need a better actuator. Personally i would be getting a 1bar/14psi actuator on there at some point.

thanks. i will definitely hit up the tuner after the last few posts. i have no idea whats going on with the timing and vct etc etc. that was the only dyno printout i got.

intake pipe is factory item.

cooler is hybrid 600x300 with 3in outlets.

i thought the cat might have been blocked, so i went for a drive minus the exhaust lol. lots of noise, but no extra power.

in regards to air temp, they should be able to check this on the dyno yes? the ecu has air temp correction i believe.

looks like poor tune to me as it's making the right boost at the right time. could be a cam timing problem though too. also what headgasket went back in? standard size or thicker?

looks like poor tune to me as it's making the right boost at the right time. could be a cam timing problem though too. also what headgasket went back in? standard size or thicker?

probably standard size. why do you ask?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...