Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I'm currently looking at 07 Golf R32's atm with the DSG gearbox, and was just wondering if anyone here has much experience with them. I took one for a test drive yesterday and was very impressed with it, however I'm a little concerned about the reliability of the DSG gearbox. I'm also hearing conflicting stories about the effectiveness of mods on it and whether they are worthwhile. I'm keeping my GTR for the track so I don't plan going crazy on it, but I would like to get a bit more power and responsiveness out of it in the future.

Also, is anyone familiar with VW mechanics who specialise in tuning etc.?

Cheers :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306250-golf-r32s/
Share on other sites

Get a GTI instead.

The R32 just isn't worth the money, in my opinion. It's barely quicker than a GTI unless it's wet, and you're paying a crapload of money for what amounts to a nice-sounding Audi A3 with a downmarket badge.

The GTI is also easier to tune up. Reflashing the ECU will net you around 30% more power without even touching any physical component of the car. Like all turbo cars, bang for buck you'll get more performance from modifying it.

Being only 2WD, if you get the DSG you'll still have less load through the driveline, which should also give you some peace of mind.

Apparently they're not that expensive though. I was talking to a mate last week, and he said his mate paid around $700 to service the DSG in his VW when the clutch-plates needed replacing. It's not cheap, but its not massively expensive either compared to overhauling a technologically inferior slusho.

Hell, if you're planning on only using it as a daily with a bit of squirt, consider finding a 2.0L diesel Golf and flash its ECU. Great fuel economy, f**kloads of bottom end torque, and with the reflash it should pull a bit more smoothly in the upper ranges of its revband. With a DSG, keeping the engine on the boil shouldn't be as big of a pain either.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306250-golf-r32s/#findComment-5064175
Share on other sites

Get a GTI instead.

The R32 just isn't worth the money, in my opinion. It's barely quicker than a GTI unless it's wet, and you're paying a crapload of money for what amounts to a nice-sounding Audi A3 with a downmarket badge.

The GTI is also easier to tune up. Reflashing the ECU will net you around 30% more power without even touching any physical component of the car. Like all turbo cars, bang for buck you'll get more performance from modifying it.

but this sounds exactly like comparing the r33 gtst to an r33gtr, stock for stock there isnt a whole lot of differnce accelerating in the dry, wet is the gtr's main advantage, same with gti and r32,

Have you tried to drive a gti fast compared to an r32..... there is a world of diffence just like compaing the gtst with a gtr, its not all about how fast they go in a straight line if you know what i mean. And in the wet the r32 absolutely slaughters the gti, it is much safer, it is glued to the road ect.... if you can afford it and you like it get the r32

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306250-golf-r32s/#findComment-5064377
Share on other sites

I'm in the process of getting a MK5 2L TDI as a daily. From what I've found... the GTI is a tinkerer's wet dream compared to the R32, also there's far more GTI owners out there than R32's so the aftermarket world is saturated with upgrade bits for the GTI. I'd much rather buy a GTI and spend the extra $10000 on upgrades.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306250-golf-r32s/#findComment-5064444
Share on other sites

thought the 2.0L TDI was the GT?

Although for shits n giggles I would love to get a MK4 1.9L TDi and run it on fish & chip oil :action-smiley-069:

Nah, there is 1.9L (77kw i think) and 2.0L (103kw) and then the GT Sport TDi with 125kw and better seats, paddles, bigger brakes, wheels, suspension etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306250-golf-r32s/#findComment-5064706
Share on other sites

Nah, there is 1.9L (77kw i think) and 2.0L (103kw) and then the GT Sport TDi with 125kw and better seats, paddles, bigger brakes, wheels, suspension etc.

Price difference between 2.0L TDi and GT Sport TDi? CBF with paddles, wheels and suspension will get changed regardless. Seats... meh. Is it really worth it? Performance... well it'll share the garage with much higher performance cars, so for commuting only in bumper to bumper traffic. maybe occasional country roadtrip.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306250-golf-r32s/#findComment-5064789
Share on other sites

Price difference between 2.0L TDi and GT Sport TDi? CBF with paddles, wheels and suspension will get changed regardless. Seats... meh. Is it really worth it? Performance... well it'll share the garage with much higher performance cars, so for commuting only in bumper to bumper traffic. maybe occasional country roadtrip.

Save your money and get teh 1.9L then.

Or better yet, a diesel Polo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306250-golf-r32s/#findComment-5066278
Share on other sites

I have had a Golf 1.9 diesel, a jetta 2.0 diesel and my mate has a Golf 2.0 diesel gt. The Golf GT is a great little car whith plenty of torque and heaps of fun. Check out REVO tunning and see just how much power these cars make from a simple reflash of the ecu.

If you don't car much for the performance then just go the 1.9, but the 2.0 engine is quite nice and again with a remp alone you are talking 400nm, the GT with just a remap is 440nm and in a little car is fun, not to mention the 1000+km per tank~

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306250-golf-r32s/#findComment-5073575
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...