Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i'm getting everything done , Forged Rods + Pistons and ACL bearings all round . N1 Oil pump + N1 water pump and full head work done .. so im expecting around 300rwkw+ with the turbo + Fuel setup that i have .. I give the car alot of hell , hence why my last motor blew up due to seized bearing or whatever made my rod fly out the side of block .. I just dont wanna have any oil issues with the car and was wondering is the Spool Hi Energy sump too much for what im doing and does it really help with the rb25 oil issues .. also i am fitting the tomei oil oriphis or watever they are called into the head

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306518-big-sump/#findComment-5067241
Share on other sites

I agree. Drop the N1 pump too and buy a JUN or something better with the money you'll save, and run the 1.5mm restrictor/block off plug setup as per sydney kids recommendonations.

If your overly concerned about oil surge on the street because of how you give the car hell, then run the oil level a tad above the high line. Problem solved.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306518-big-sump/#findComment-5069000
Share on other sites

if you're just doing street work there may be some baffle kit for the sump?

i have a sump baffle and an oil restrictor on my GTR when i had my engine rebuilt.

it works well for the street.

and if you're not tracking the car, then i doubt you'd really need to be sitting on the rev limiter when driving it on the street.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306518-big-sump/#findComment-5069028
Share on other sites

Waste of money.

N1 pump is fine.

Stock sump is also fine.

If you are worried, just overfill by 500ml for a RB25. As long as the head/restrictors are done correctly in a street car you don't need to go all stupid on parts.

Especailly not for 300rwkw.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306518-big-sump/#findComment-5069044
Share on other sites

Im buying billet gears for my stock oil pump...should solve durability issues as even the N1 pump still runs sintered steel for the gears, which is prone to cracking, the best part is the billet gears cost a lot less than the high end pumps but should be just as strong

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306518-big-sump/#findComment-5069166
Share on other sites

if the motor is out then y not do it anyway???

what if in 6 months he suddenly decideds he wants to take it racing abit.

may aswell do it now n save on labour in the future.

I can play that game as well... What if he doesn't go circuit racing? Pointless mod.

Even with 300rwkw @ the circuit - Your "average" 350rwkw GTR with 4wd and semi's comp's doesnt use sump baffling...

Now given they will have more traction and g-force than a 300rwkw gts-t will ever have...

I cannot see a baffled sump being of much use.

More beers @ the pub for him basically, signifigantly more infact.

The fact he "gives his car hell" and threw a rod would be more about limiter abuse and poor maintenance... none of which a super sump is going to stop at all.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306518-big-sump/#findComment-5069182
Share on other sites

fit std pump and std water pump, more than adequate.

We used a std RB26 sump with removed diff and a tomei baffle only. With a greddy pump (60l per min) we had no issues for 3 years, we "upgraded" to a bigger baffled sump from a reputable engine builder and it cost us two engines (independently inspected).... swapped to an ASR and all the dramas are over.

point of story, you dont need one but if you do the only after market RWD sump we use now is the ASR (high energy) item.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306518-big-sump/#findComment-5069243
Share on other sites

Was it a properly built motor, with 300rwkw, as per the nature of this thread?

But then, all you NSW people seem to suffer from SBS.

Stock motor at 250RWKW...

And it spat it off throttle. When I picked the throttle up it was all over.

And that's because NSW has real race tracks... Or did... :D Oran Park ate mine going through the dip before the bridge...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306518-big-sump/#findComment-5069689
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...