Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys im in the process of purchasing an r33 turbo to replace my r32 stock turbo and was thinking of changing my smic for a r34 gtt one... just want your thoughts on if it would be a good investment in getting one of those. im not really here to chase alot of power though if it would help a fair bit in air ratio wise, is it good value for money in worth getting.

cheers guys,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306854-r34-gtt-vs-r32-gtst-smic/
Share on other sites

The R34 SMIC intecooler is better but still junk, it heatsoaks badly and only delays the inevitable. FMIC are cheap nowadays and just jup have returb flow ones for next to nothing. I got 34 gtt ones laying around like dead flys.

I did make 198 rwkw, when my car had the standard R33 turbo and R34 SMIC. So it is definitely an improvement over the standard R32 or R33 intercooler.

The reason I stuck with a side mount initially, was because I didn't want the increased length of piping (and reduction in throttle response) when combined with the standard plenum.

In the end I had to go for a front mount, but changed the plenum at the same time to minimise the piping.

i still call bullshit on it being an improvement

any core could make 200rwkw

even a top mount core could make a single 200rwkw pass

but after that run, its heatsoaked and useless for anything further

thats where the difference between the core and its location that matters

once its heatsoaked, how quickly can it ditch all the heat thats stored in it

Paul,

Calling Bullshit is a bit strange? A larger core has to be somewhat of an improvement, as the core has more surface area.

This extra surface area will take more heat from the air before it gets heat soaked (as there's more alloy to heat up).

It's common knowledge that a front mount will be a much greater improvement, due to it's location and the extra core size. But if the larger size of the side-mount core didn't make a difference, why did Nissan progressively increase it's size over the years?

Ryno

  • 1 month later...
i still call bullshit on it being an improvement

any core could make 200rwkw

even a top mount core could make a single 200rwkw pass

but after that run, its heatsoaked and useless for anything further

thats where the difference between the core and its location that matters

once its heatsoaked, how quickly can it ditch all the heat thats stored in it

I call bullshit on the bullshit call too... it is simple matter of physics and the R34 SMIC has more surface area, volume and weight (approx 50% more!!!).

Unless you're also calling bullshit to thousands of years of science that means: more flow, a bigger heat sink and better heat transfer capabilities. ;)

With some simple improvements to ducting and air flow (e.g. R34 air duct on the front, some foam rubber to seal it to the SMIC and more venting in the inner guard to let the hot air out) it is a big improvement over the stock R33 SMIC.

Yes a FMIC is better but a half decent one also costs $800+ and requires some effort to fit, not to mention the lack of stealth (if that's your thing).

If you have mild mods and are using the stock ECU/turbo the R34 SMIC upgrade at under $200 is a bargain!

I got instant power gains and much better response due to this mod, I also added an 8inch thermofan (400CFM) to aid cooling for good measure.

P.S. Getting heatsoaked on a dyno is indicative of nothing, unless you drive your car on one...

I call bullshit on the bullshit call too... it is simple matter of physics and the R34 SMIC has more surface area, volume and weight (approx 50% more!!!).

Unless you're also calling bullshit to thousands of years of science that means: more flow, a bigger heat sink and better heat transfer capabilities. :D

With some simple improvements to ducting and air flow (e.g. R34 air duct on the front, some foam rubber to seal it to the SMIC and more venting in the inner guard to let the hot air out) it is a big improvement over the stock R33 SMIC.

Yes a FMIC is better but a half decent one also costs $800+ and requires some effort to fit, not to mention the lack of stealth (if that's your thing).

If you have mild mods and are using the stock ECU/turbo the R34 SMIC upgrade at under $200 is a bargain!

I got instant power gains and much better response due to this mod, I also added an 8inch thermofan (400CFM) to aid cooling for good measure.

P.S. Getting heatsoaked on a dyno is indicative of nothing, unless you drive your car on one...

thier crap fullstop they are designed for 6psi and daily driving not 12-odd psi and any sort of decent spirited driving. A quick datalog of AIT quickly proves this. I can listr about 6 customers with ARC SMIC and r34 SMIC that are having issues on anything warmer than 25 degree days.... track days in anything over that requires stupid numbers removed from the timing map.. few are still on std turbos. Add a decent turbo and the issue comes to fuition twice as quick.

one rb20 skyline with gt2530 has an ait (pfc djetro on rb20) that takes timing out as the temp increases, it turned out after 3 laps of winton the total timing was reduced so much to stave off det that when i ran it on the dyno with those timing figures it only made 170rwkw..... std power, fitted a cheap 400 turnflow kit and it is sweet.

if someone is happy to pay $200 (like you reckon) for a r34 smic be my guest i have a few id be happy to part with.

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...