Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Willall Racing just ran a 1 min 12.19 at Mallala today in their JDM R35 GTR.

Faster than the group A R32 GTR!

Congratulations Keir & Martin. You guys are flying now.

E85 looks like the way to go, when are you going to fit the bigger turbos?

Wish I was there................. oh well. I will keep working.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/307957-r35-faster-than-group-a-r32-gtr/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

congrats, its great that a relatively standard 35 gtr tweaked by a few cluey guys in the city of churches has outdone a 21 year old R32 with extensive race history funded by a rich tobacco company with part factory backing run by one of the best in the business :)

:laugh:

Today was one of those fruitful testing sessions where the track is 'in the slot' versus other times recently when we have been there where the drifters have convered the corners is dirt, or the supertrucks had laid diesel everywhere. No excuses today, it was a good solid fast track condition day and with plenty of time we were able to run some good data on the car and start to dial in the suspension and wing settings. Best part though is that after a couple of months working on our EVO programme I was able to get back in the chair of the GTR and have a feel of the setup....I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity of 'de-greening' the slicks in the morning session, which is kind of like trying to drive a 9 second drag car on ice.

The biggest problem the GTR faces in its current guise is that it is traction limited. Believe it or not, even with a set of new Michelin medium compound slicks on board and properly bedded in controlling wheelspin through the esses and out of turns three and five is a real problem, and one that can panic the four wheel drive electronics if not managed correctly. You really need to feed the throttle to stop the fronts and rears lighting up and pushing the car into a big sideways moment. I found this out early on in the piece when the tyres were still green. The pure raw straighline speed of the car is unnerving as it builds speed so quickly, and is stretching well into fifth gear at the braking points, as is keeping the throttle into it through the kink and the long left hander out of the nothern hairpin. Its a difficult balancing act, and one I wasnt prepared to push the limits of after the break, so 14s over the three laps I did was acceptable. The whole time you need to keep the thought that this is a 700hp+ road car chassis in the back of your head and drive accordingly. It would be interesting to take one of the 'these cars drive themselves' crew for a passenger lap for the sport of it one day. My only suggestion would be to bring an adult diaper or be prepared to pay a cleaning fee :(

'Power down' engine management settings (TPS controlled boost mapping) for corner exit speed and then adjusting the relationship between bump/rebound and tyre pressure for the varying track temperatures over the day gave us the pace increase, no magic here, just a methodical work structure of test and tune. Sensibly on fresh tyres there is no reason why we shouldnt be able to record consistent 1:10 laps in this car. That might sound a little far fetched now, but 6 months ago the idea of a 1:12 in a road car would have been bordering on unbelievable, particularly as this is a stock engine, stock turbo, stock transmission car. Some well thought out modifications, a set of slick tyres and ongoing testing and development are the keys to this cars pace :(

We have some way to go still to beat the Winfield cars by the looks of it, Skaife had it on pole there in 1991 with a 1.09 or similar. One must always have targets! However we are only 3 tenths of the outright Carerra Cup lap record to put the whole thing in perspective :nyaanyaa:

Edited by Martin Donnon

+1 on the brake water spray progress..

And not to cast aspersions on you and Keir's driving skills Martin, but you have to remember it was "Thee Mark Skaife" driving that R32. We need to compare apples with apples here. What additional time would him or some other professional driver well on his game be able to extract out of your R35?

Edited by fungoolie

Interestingly enough the brake cooling system raised its head in anger when I had overlooked part of my job. Essentially I didnt mark off the bottle was filled between sessions, and sure enough there was enough water surge away from the pickup of the pump to ensure that before the low level warning was on (there was still over a litre in the tank) that the car was off an into the dirt with the brake pedal on the floor. At this pace we have four laps of full stint running before we have to refill the stock washer bottle, or risk boiling the brake fluid. To give you an idea of the temperature difference we now have a cooling system in the pits for the front brakes and the frontal cooling system of the car, when it came in with no water left in the tank the left hand side front pads caught alight, and thats after two cool down laps! :)

Sure enough though we have done some math on the car today and have worked around what I believe is some sensible SA engineering thats still roadable to get this car comfortably into the 1:10 zone at the track :domokun:

give me a drive, 3rd lap I promise you a 1.09 :)

or at least die trying !!

nice work, great read.

currently home-prepping my rb26 track car ready for its 1st rundown on 12/4/01 at the sau:sa track day

Martin

what are you max lateral g's now, vs say prior ro the slicks and/or wing? Might be handy to put a scale on the right hand of the chart

Or even post your G force polar plot please.

I didnt get around to a full G-plot today (forgot actually!)

What I can tell you though Fungoolie is that in the Esses we are seeing around 1.35-1.4 lateral G loading,

and the big one -1.2G at 202km/h on the face of the kink. Thats why it feels a little scary :down:

I didnt get around to a full G-plot today (forgot actually!)

What I can tell you though Fungoolie is that in the Esses we are seeing around 1.35-1.4 lateral G loading,

and the big one -1.2G at 202km/h on the face of the kink. Thats why it feels a little scary :P

Cogs of steel guys! 1.2G in the kink? Glad you had slicks on! :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...