Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

NSW: bling +100 offset rims slammed.

VIC; bling -100 offset rims slammed.

Either way, they both seem a rather pointless to me, this "HellaFlush" trend makes me LOL.

what style would you prefer? everyone getting around with gtr/r400 bars and mspec side skirts.. oh and lets not forget the "gtr" wing on the gts-t..and the odd badge for good measure

sickkkkkk :)

what style would you prefer? everyone getting around with gtr/r400 bars and mspec side skirts.. oh and lets not forget the "gtr" wing on the gts-t..and the odd badge for good measure

sickkkkkk :P

r33 40th anniversary?

with you on the good fitment though.. how could anyone be against that :D

what style would you prefer? everyone getting around with gtr/r400 bars and mspec side skirts.. oh and lets not forget the "gtr" wing on the gts-t..and the odd badge for good measure

sickkkkkk :P

meh, i like cars stockish, i wish my car had a gtst front bar.

function over form. functional ride height, functional tyre fitment, not spending money on kits that dont do shit for aero/on cars that dont go on the track etc.

im loving all the hellaflush business.

Next car will def have tuff fittment

sunken is bad, but hellaflush is poser spec. is there no middle ground? lipped guards with normal tyres at functional height?(good geo, clearance etc)

oops, it wont pull the bitches. honestly, when has a "hellaflush" car ever gotten you a quality girl?, or is it about cred with other guys? insecure much?

I am sure for some it could be they're personal taste, but for most it seems to just be a groupy/"trend" thing.

stock looking 32gtst with 33GTR rims= win, stock looking 33/34gtst/gtt with 34GTR rims = win.

i think we have complete opposite ideas on car modifying.

what you have described sounds like stock ugly shit..

i dont see how hellaflush is poser spec at all but whatever if you dont know what your talking about its a pointless converstaion.

who said anything about pulling bitches? is that what your skyline is for.. my car is functional its for sliding.. if i wana pull bitches ill take my lexus out.

in closing you seem like an idiot, you have a baseless argument soo u start talking about pulling bitches?

meh, i like cars stockish, i wish my car had a gtst front bar.

function over form. functional ride height, functional tyre fitment, not spending money on kits that dont do shit for aero/on cars that dont go on the track etc.

+1

but it all comes down to the primary use of the car.

If its just being driven as a daily, 200kw-300kw wont do much good in peak hour traffic. Hence they spend money on cosmetics.

The ideal height for perfect handling is 350mm guard to hub and to the majority of skyline owners this is too high. Let them enjoy their style of modification whilst you easily drive over speedhumps hehe :P

When guys in melbourne start aesthetically modding though, that's when the problem comes. They either do it well (hamish's car for example) or they go lebo spec ethnic candy colour with shitty wheels and badly fitted kits.

:D

Whats bad about them?

I heard they are very heavy wheels?

Or are they just shit overall?

the look shit

they are heavy

they look shit

build quality is shit

they look shit

offsets are shit

they look shit

they are heavy

they look shit

what style would you prefer? everyone getting around with gtr/r400 bars and mspec side skirts.. oh and lets not forget the "gtr" wing on the gts-t..and the odd badge for good measure

sickkkkkk :P

so fkn true mang!

300kw wont do much good in peak hour traffic.

does me just fine in traffic ;)

The ideal height for perfect handling is 350mm guard to hub and to the majority of skyline owners this is too high.

damn straight..... 350mm looks aids

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So for the wide band is a Bosch 4.9 correct for the Link G4+ along with a Can bus? Just get the Link gear or is generic ok too? Eg here: LINK LINK DIGITAL WIDEBAND CAN MODULE WITH BOSCH 4.9 SENSOR : KYP Performance House  
    • Bit difficult to follow. Have a look below and see what the standard R32 layout was like. Note there was a restrictor in place immediately before "turbocharged pressure control solenoid" that, if removed, magically got you 1 bar boost.
    • I might be way off the mark here.. there must be a T junction under the manifold. That takes manifold pressure through a check valve prior to the T, one side splits out to this bleed off orifice, the other straight to the wastegate actuators. 
    • Carrying out some engine due diligence before my first drive in a 260RS that has been in storage for 10+ years, and found two lines that are susposed to be plumbed into the boost control solenoid. One of the lines (the wastegate boost supply line) to actuate the gates, had a bolt in one end blocking it. The other line (main boost signal line) from the very rear of the intake manifold (RB26DETT) and runs up to the boost controller had this pill in the end of it as seen in photos. Other than the obvious (T28 Ceramic turbos might well be cooked)  Can anyone shed any light on if there is any validity at all with this mod, bleeding a constant fixed rate of manifold boost pressure off through this 3mm hole?  Is it deliberate?  Was this a 90s Jap mod done to RB26's? Or has someone just fitted this without any idea of what happens to ceramic T28s if they are not gate controlled?    
×
×
  • Create New...