Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

anyone know of any GTR's running the PT6262 ball bearing with a T4 Divided .84 A/R with 3 5/8" V-Band discharge? would the .84 twin scroll be abit restrictive on the 26?

I have just bolted mine up today. The exact turbo u are talking about. Hoping to have it running by next weekend after i finish a 34 with PT5558.

I have fabbed up dump pipes for both and worked out cooler piping, plumb back pipes etc

efeef931.jpg

421f596b.jpg

This will be interesting Jez!

What's the specs for that 34?

Stock neo motor with Type B poncams and adj exh cam gear, link ecu with flex fuel tune, hybrid manifold, mvr 44mm gate, id2000's plazmaman ffp, DVS dump and plumbback pipe. Hoping to have it running and tuned early next week. Depending if Link arrives and also waiting on plazmaman plenum to be finished.

I was wondering whether you got the new turbo in yet, guess I have the answer.

How much boost are you going to run do you think?

That i will have to see what the engine likes when im tuning it. I will see how confident i feel with the power output as its a stock motor. Also running stock cams atm. I would like to see the differences in stock cams then type B poncams. Then i will think about doing variable cam once i have to upgrade the headgasket.

Very nice, shame its a stock motor as its probably not going to be able to show its real strength. I am assuming its a ball bearing 6262, and you are going to tune for E85?

Yes both are ball bearing. My rb26 i am trying to get as much response as possible which is why i went twinscroll 6boost manifold and .8 twin scroll rear. My old steelwheeled highflows came on hard around 4500rpm ad made 307 so i am aiming to better that

Yes both will be tuned on E85. They are actually both going to be be flex fuel tuned.

We understand the stock motors will be the limiting factor but not going to build the motorS until the time comes

My old steelwheeled highflows came on hard around 4500rpm ad made 307 so i am aiming to better that

Yes both will be tuned on E85. They are actually both going to be be flex fuel tuned.

Nice, very interested to see where it comes in - I've always had it in my head the PT6262 would be on the laggy side, though never been sure. If it can be all in before 4500rpm then that'd be fantastic :)

Stock neo motor with Type B poncams and adj exh cam gear, link ecu with flex fuel tune, hybrid manifold, mvr 44mm gate, id2000's plazmaman ffp, DVS dump and plumbback pipe. Hoping to have it running and tuned early next week. Depending if Link arrives and also waiting on plazmaman plenum to be finished.

That i will have to see what the engine likes when im tuning it. I will see how confident i feel with the power output as its a stock motor. Also running stock cams atm. I would like to see the differences in stock cams then type B poncams. Then i will think about doing variable cam once i have to upgrade the headgasket.

Are you going to stick with 2.5" out of the IC into the plenum or go 3"?

3 inch is pretty big Roy, I usually use 3 inch out of the turbo on builds over 400kw, I know it supports at least 550wkw from a car I did recently... 2.5 inch should be fine mate for either side.

I also fabricated piping for a built STI Liberty in 2 1/4 alloy, it runs 280awkw. More important is the cooler end tank design imo.

Just curious, mine are 2.5" and the numbers suggest that for 590cfm it should be fine with 2.5", but as always its interesting that the RB26 and GTR run 3" std

I see what u mean Roy, we will find out soon but i dont think the 2.5 will limit the setup. I think the only thing that will limit the setup is the standard internals

Very nice, shame its a stock motor as its probably not going to be able to show its real strength. I am assuming its a ball bearing 6262, and you are going to tune for E85?

the engine will take allot of abuse with that turbo on e85.... :P just dont be scared. These turbos come alive at around 28-35psi.

the engine will take allot of abuse with that turbo on e85.... :P just dont be scared. These turbos come alive at around 28-35psi.

Stre180 sr20vet made 'apparently' 760rwhp on a 6262 .63 housing it would want to be a low mileage 26 to even make 600whp reliable.

Stre180 sr20vet made 'apparently' 760rwhp on a 6262 .63 housing it would want to be a low mileage 26 to even make 600whp reliable.

I agree it would want to be a "known" engine but really 600whp is a walk in the park especially for a few dyno runs....if it was my own personal car like it is with jez i would have no problem running it regulary at 400rwkw. We see this power quite often on std 26 engines on E85. I reckon in realistic power @ 35 odd psi 700whp is achievable with that setup but i would stay sub 30 on std bottom end.... i still find it difficult to believe that 760whp result with the 0.63 housing.

Interesting that you mention that, someone I know hit 400awkw on E85 at around 22psi with his unopened <100,000km old RB26 and coolant started escaping places it wouldn't, I had thought it should be reasonably safely doable too... good to know there are plenty of others which have done so fine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...