Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought they were both pretty much ready to go on the dyno bar the 34's fuel setup?

I'll let Kurtis do the update on here for ya :) or Jez... I know it's close though and am getting pretty pumped for the results :yes:

That is on your 32 yeh? If so that's pretty solid, looks like you're on track for your 400kw. It's hitting full boost nicely for that size turbo, I'm liking the idea of twin scroll setups I must say.

Sucks about the fuel issues though!

How goes the 34 on single scroll?

Edited by Mitcho_7

Ok still running out of fuel with surge tanks. Mr

Speedflow gaurenteed dash 6 would flow enough. :thumbsdown:

Just getting dash 8 now from surgetank.

So far at 5300rpm 343kw 25psi :) full boost at 3750

Ohhhhhhhh yeah!!! :yes:

Mine was OK at dash 6 but you are going higher again :D love it!!

So you were being rather modest by setting the bar at 350kw on the 34 then!

25psi is alot to put into a standard bottom end, let's hope it last for a while

Yours should see 400kw easy if the 34 is anything to go by!

Edited by Mitcho_7

I was wrong in the other post. It was actually 353kw. Tried a -8 line from 044 but unfortunately we need to add another 044 and a few Y peices with twin entry rail. Ahh well part of the fun i guess

Well that's gotta sh*t you off...

But still 353kw is still huge considering the tunes not even finished yet.

Well that's gotta sh*t you off...

But still 353kw is still huge considering the tunes not even finished yet.

Yeah it's a little shit

But we will get it in the end, I'm super happy with how the work is paying off Jez put a long day in to Skybitch So I'm sure his head and eyes are sore.

On the upside we now know What we need to do for the gtr.

Yeah im gonna have to do a tiny little overhaul of my fuel setup... Damn

Haha, Have to start charging more for tunes eh ?

Are you both running 100mm thick coolers with 3" pipes for this much power or are you getting away with 76mm coolers and/or 2.5" pipes?

Edited by Mitcho_7

Yeah it's a little shit

But we will get it in the end, I'm super happy with how the work is paying off Jez put a long day in to Skybitch So I'm sure his head and eyes are sore.

On the upside we now know What we need to do for the gtr.

Awesome so far mate, makes me want the same turbo now :P

I was wrong in the other post. It was actually 353kw. Tried a -8 line from 044 but unfortunately we need to add another 044 and a few Y peices with twin entry rail. Ahh well part of the fun i guess

Isnt this turning out a little excessive for sub 400kw?

I wonder why it needs so much flow, le hmm.

Are you high? 360kw is farken good no matter what. If you don't like your setup, I'll have it...

Haha yeah i am more than happy with mine man :P Just being a clown!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...