Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A little? lol... A LOT!

I just wish I new where to start, it's got everything it needs to make a decent number, but it's knock restricted.

When jez tuned it last the exhuast was way to small, now that I've got a bigger system coming from jap and I made some 3inch tuned length front pipes into a 4inch merge. The exhuast issues should b over, so it's back to jezza's shop to c if there's any gains.

Strange thing is, I had a 4inch system made, and we chucked it on the dyno, only got 7kw gain with adding timing and boost.

C what happens, maybe we need to play with the cams, or something.

Depends what manifold you get.. The Full race one I have was designed for fitment on 33/34s. Tried putting it on my 32 and the compressor fouled on it..apparently full race have rectified this for 32s now

A/C didn't work anyway so I'm not too fussed, then again I may have wanted to fix it one day :s

I saw a dyno graph from a famous 32 on the weekend. It's now running a Precision single (6766 I think he said). The Precision shits allover the -5's for response on the graph, and from his times, on the track too! The 32 is still 2.6 as well so these turbos are obviously a good thing!

Correct! and yes WOW! it has me thinking the EFR's are on their last chance... :yes:

I've already emailed him to find out exactly what version he has on the 32.

The 34 is running one also, however he likes the one on the 32 better.

One thing he did say to me was to buy bigger than I think I'll need and I won't be disappointed, they are that good.

I would choose a Precision over an EFR any day. . .too much hype with the BW's. . .too many results to look away from Precision. . .sorry, but a 2-year wait on an EFR is ridiculous. . .

bri73y.. .do you have a chart for that r32 running the 6766? I'm running this on my FD. . .sounds too good to be true that it would shit on the -5's. . .

I would choose a Precision over an EFR any day. . .too much hype with the BW's. . .too many results to look away from Precision. . .sorry, but a 2-year wait on an EFR is ridiculous. . .

bri73y.. .do you have a chart for that r32 running the 6766? I'm running this on my FD. . .sounds too good to be true that it would shit on the -5's. . .

No sorry, it's not my car, although it has lived in my garage for a while previously. Damn should've stolen bits off it when I had a chance.... :whistling:

Correct! and yes WOW! it has me thinking the EFR's are on their last chance... :yes:

I've already emailed him to find out exactly what version he has on the 32.

The 34 is running one also, however he likes the one on the 32 better.

One thing he did say to me was to buy bigger than I think I'll need and I won't be disappointed, they are that good.

Any email back? The one on the 34 did look a little bigger but by how much I couldn't say. I'd love to know!

What do you think you will order for your car John? 6466?

Depends what manifold you get.. The Full race one I have was designed for fitment on 33/34s. Tried putting it on my 32 and the compressor fouled on it..apparently full race have rectified this for 32s now

A/C didn't work anyway so I'm not too fussed, then again I may have wanted to fix it one day :s

Hey Joe, or anyone for that matter..

Is there any evidence that the Full Race Manifold is worth the cost vs 6boost & ETM etc being about double the $ ??

Will wait and see how Piggaz's turns out, as I also have a 2.8, been running a TO4Z for a couple of years on stainless china manifold, time to get with the times, with a good manifold and probably a Precision..

wouldn't the one Jez is running, with 30+ psi on a 2.8L with cams etc see 450-500rwkw ? with awesome responce .

Edited by tricstar

Hey Joe, or anyone for that matter..

Is there any evidence that the Full Manifold is worth the cost vs 6boost & ETM etc being about double the $ ??

Will wait and see how Piggaz's turns out, as I also have a 2.8, been running a TO4Z for a couple of years on stainless china manifold, time to get with the times, with a 6boost and unplumbing the gate.

wouldn't the one Jez is running, with 30+ psi on a 2.8L with cams etc see 450-500rwkw ? with awesome responce .

Fixed, no need for new turbo :)

wouldn't the one Jez is running, with 30+ psi on a 2.8L with cams etc see 450-500rwkw ? with awesome responce .

Well it made 436 on a 2.3 SR with 24-25 lbs of boost on the same dyno as i made 425 with -5's. It beat my setup low end and pipped me up top. I'd love to see what it would make with 30 psi!

If the 6466 is too big just rip it off and drop back 1 size. Little touch up and away we go!

Hey Joe, or anyone for that matter..

Is there any evidence that the Full Race Manifold is worth the cost vs 6boost & ETM etc being about double the $ ??

Will wait and see how Piggaz's turns out, as I also have a 2.8, been running a TO4Z for a couple of years on stainless china manifold, time to get with the times, with a good manifold and probably a Precision..

wouldn't the one Jez is running, with 30+ psi on a 2.8L with cams etc see 450-500rwkw ? with awesome responce .

Honestly mate don't know if the full race is better or not. Would need to do some back to back testing which would be a real pain in the ass as you would need to plumb up 2 different sets of gates.

If I had my time again I would probably just bought a 6 boost one for reasons such as

1. Cheaper

2. Quicker to obtain (each fullrace manifold is made On order)

3. If it cracked or failed in anyway would be easier for warranty

4. The full race is a bit of a nightmare plumbing wise.

Though I do like how the manifold looks and how it makes the turbo sit towards the front of the car.

I also had to cut a bit of the re enforcement out of my bonnet to fit the Massive frame of the BW

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...