Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Very nice, on E85 I assume? Why bother with the -5s? :(

Because the last tune was close to 430 RWKW. Different head and a few different mods I wanna see what these little things can do. They should crack 450 without too much trouble.

What - why?? PT6766 would be the smallest I'd put on one of those, there is someone running around with an FP GT3794HTA on one and it sounds awesome. They just need to wind up the boost and supporting mods a bit to justify it more.

6766 is massive lol nearly a kilo of ponies man, what the fek haha

Any idea where to find the sheet for said HTA Failcon? I am considering a barra swap into something atm

i messaged DLM regarding whether the 6262 or 6266 was the best choice for my motor setup

ive been chasing information on the precision 62 series turbos on an rb25/30 and thought you may be able to shed some light.

my engine is as follows:

r33 rb25 head vct removed

272 9.3mm lift cams

8000rpm limit

rb30 bottom end

forged pistons & rods

9:1 compression

rb26 itb's adapted to the rb25 head

98 octane fuel z32 afm and apexi powerfc

the car is used for drift, drag, circuit motorkhana basically everything so response is a huge factor.

im told a garrett 3540 will spool somewhere around the 3500-4000 rpm mark and thats what id like or better from a precision unit.

i currently have a standard rb25 gearset in my gearbox that will be upgraded 1st-3rd dog box in the future so for now im chasing power around the 330-350kw mark, with hopefully enough scope in the turbo to change to e85 later and chase 400kw.

from my research and understanding the two units im looking at are either the 6262 or 6266 with the .84 rear housing.

how much laggier would a 6266 be over the 6262? when could i be expecting the turbo to be on song?

any information would be great.

thanks john

and their reply was as follows:

Hey John,

A perfect street and strip combination would be the 6266 for your RB25/30 and the combination you have forwarded below, this will spool relatively early start around 1800-2000 and give you substantial boost by 3000-3500 rpm! This turbo will produce 750+hp on full song and for pump fuel if you set up the gate properly or run some Methonol injection kit you will have full boost by 3000rpm!

I hope the above info is helpful, I have the ball bearing billet comp wheel and aluminum backplate, ported S cover in stock, with both .84 split pulse & .82 v-band in and out options for your consideration.

Regards

Spiro

DLM

they are some pretty unreal claims they are making, i will be buying a bb6266 in the coming months once my motor is built and see what it will actually make and the spool times. will probably get the tuner to do some big power runs to see what its capable of making then pull it right back to save my gearbox untill i can afford a dog box

From Real Street's ebay website:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Precision-5558-Journal-Bearing-Billet-CEA-55mm-Turbo-T3-T4-SP-V-Band-63-A-R-/290672655598?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43ad70bcee&vxp=mtr

scrolling down to the bottom right - the sign in red says, 'due to the huge influx of sales from their billet line of turbos, there is currently a lead time of 2-4 weeks before shipping of any Precision turbo'..

Think this applies to most sellers..long huh! :yucky:

Edited by rondofj

I'm going to purchase a 5858 SP T3 0.63 v-band Ball Bearing for my SR20.

Spoke to Yavuz and luckily he agreed it was the way to go with the T3 manifold "for me", although he did speak highly of the T4 twin scroll set-ups.

Am going to order in the next week or so.

What made him believe it was 'for you'? Can you tell me more about this decision?? I have a T3 highmount setup SR also

Mainly the power goals I have with the expected level of response, all on E85.

  1. I want to make around 300rwk on approx 16-18psi
  2. I want to make around 320rwk on approx 20-22psi
  3. I want to make 350rwk++ on approx 25+psi
  4. I want full boost (boost level as defined above for each power goal) between 3900 to 4500rpm

To achieve that;

  • The 5858 will be slightly laggier than the 5558 but will make more power.
  • A 5558 will have better response and make 320rkw but may need higher boost levels to achieve it - something I cant quite do yet on a standard bottom end.
  • A 5862 or 6266 will easily make that but we believe they may be too laggy for a T3 undivided set up.
  • The 5858 is a middle of the ground compromise.

Another reason is I'm making close to 270rwk now out of a 3071 T2 on around 22psi so I don't want to upgrade to a 5558 and make 300rwk on 22psi (it should make more but I don't want to risk it) - I want the next turbo to make a BIG difference to power.

BTW my car will be running 295 semi slick tyres all around and is essentially a dedicated circuit car hence the power goals. I dont want power so I can say I have xxrwk - it will be needed and used on the track, particularly Eastern Creek.

Ultimately when the time comes (built motor) we will turn it up and try to hit 350rwk++ so the extra compressor size of the 5858 will give us that extra headway, may even be too small!!!

That's the logic (?) but will find out when it all happens I guess.

Edited by SRS13

full boost between 3900 and 4500 is pretty good expectation TBH, especially for the power goals.

What did he say it would be like getting onto boost? and are these figures on 98 or E85?

BTW do you want to sell your 3071?

Ron - errr Jase, are you getting a kando, precision or 3071? lol.. I was gona change my mind (yes - again... ;) ) after you mentioned the 5858 when I ALMOST bought the 5558, then after some frantic searches I came across a picture of a 5858 beside a 3076R, the 5858 is much bigger physically than a 3076R judging from pics - I said fark this aint fitting on my stock mani without clashes, I will stick to the 5558... LOL :whistling:

^^^ Ron: please post the pic of the 5858 next to the 3076. Although in my case it will be top mounted so not much of an issue.

All on E85.

Yeah 3900rpm is to hit 16-18psi and 4500rpm to hit 25+ and somewhere in between for 20-22psi. Those numbers based on DRE20's car running the same turbo seem doable. His hits 21psi by around 4100rpm (from memory) and goes on to make 304rwk on 98 pump. E85 brings it on a lot earlier so my numbers should be achievable(?). Only difference is his engine is overbored to 90mm so essentially 2.1ltr which does help response.

I will sell my 3071 but not sure when. But was going to try and sell as a kit with GKtech manifold, intake pipe, filter and dump pipe. I assume you only want the turbo to change the rear end to T3?

Edit: sorry without having tried one, he said it should be all in by 4500rpm which is a little late by my liking but like you said to make those numbers with a 2.0 DET your going to have to sacrifice some response. That's where diff ratio (4:3's), cam gear adjustment, throttle response and tuning all come into it.

Edited by SRS13

Ron - errr Jase, are you getting a kando, precision or 3071? lol.. I was gona change my mind (yes - again... ;) ) after you mentioned the 5858 when I ALMOST bought the 5558, then after some frantic searches I came across a picture of a 5858 beside a 3076R, the 5858 is much bigger physically than a 3076R judging from pics - I said fark this aint fitting on my stock mani without clashes, I will stick to the 5558... LOL :whistling:

I hope you realise the 5558 and 5858 are physically the same size... its the wheels that are different (internal parts).

LOL sorry to bust your dreams man...

To SRS13: it still sounds reasonable, but the 5558 would probably be the better choice for me. I am trying to get the thing on full song by 4k and am a simple 86.5mm build. I do have the cams and a 6boost so my setup should work well... but im just worried the turbo itself is too big. If I did want your 3071 I would be chasing it just to change the rear housing to a T3 and use it on my setup, yeah.

I've sent a couple of emails to Precision US direct and they advised the following for SR20 which I guess can be applied to any engine;

  • 5558 will come on a few hundred rpm quicker than the 5858 due to the larger compressor in the 5858
  • The 5858 will make more power on lower boost
  • The 5862 will be between 400-500rpm laggier than the 5858 but make 20-30peak horsepower
  • The 5858 in their opinion will be the best option to make the horsepower I want
  • The journal bearing and ball bearing units make the SAME horsepower
  • The ball bearing units will come on 200-300rpm sooner than the journal bearing - hence better curve
  • The ball bearing units have better transient response

As I am putting mine on a circuit car, boost response and transient response mean a lot hence I am getting a ball bearing 5858. If it were only a street car or even drag car I would go with a journal bearing as peak power potential is the same.

To SRS13: it still sounds reasonable, but the 5558 would probably be the better choice for me. I am trying to get the thing on full song by 4k and am a simple 86.5mm build. I do have the cams and a 6boost so my setup should work well... but im just worried the turbo itself is too big. If I did want your 3071 I would be chasing it just to change the rear housing to a T3 and use it on my setup, yeah.

My thoughts: if I were you and response and good but not big power is most important ie around 280rwk or so, I would go with a Garrett 3071R T3 with 'proper' 60mm wheel. It will be all in by 4000rpm and make between 260-300rwk depending on boost - see Badhairdave's car as a great example.

Next would be the TD06SL2-20G 8cm, that seems to make numbers anywhere from 270-300rwk but is journal bearing so once again response and transient response probably wont be as good as BB 3071r (assumption) but it will still be more responsive (based on wheels sizes) than a 5558.

Last option would be 5558 journal bearing or ball bearing. This will be IMO laggier than the above two but will make more peak power than both.

Just have to work out what you plan to use your car for and what you want.

Hope that helps!

Thanks mate, appreciate the input.

I agree with your thoughts mostly, yet wheel design wise I think the TD06SL2 20g would be more responsive than the 3071. The 3071 I think are a heavier rotating assy which needs more energy to drive, so the 20g is more of a winner there.

What continually makes me reconsider my original plan of the 20g is two things: 1 people keep telling me to go a 3071, and despite my own strong opinions I can be a little bit of a sheep. 2 I am worried I will end up wanting MOAR and being stuck with a fairly low ceiling with either of the above, hence considering the PT.

Ive still got time to decide as im still part way through building my block, but changes are the little 20g will be it. If nobody else can sway me that is haha. Look forward to your results.

What is the general power threshold of these tractor sr20s before they go boom? ie RB25, say around 280-300/320rwkw according to SAU sources.

Wonder how the tractor engines compare to the EVO 4G63 tractors.. 2L four vs 2L four..

What continually makes me reconsider my original plan of the 20g is two things: 1 people keep telling me to go a 3071, and despite my own strong opinions I can be a little bit of a sheep. 2 I am worried I will end up wanting MOAR and being stuck with a fairly low ceiling with either of the above, hence considering the PT.

And that is why I am going the 5858 over the 5558.

I was never ever going to consider the 3071 T3, just wouldn't make enough and the TD06 I feel is the same but more of an unknown quantity. So it came down to 5558 and 5858 and in the end I felt the 5858 was best - hopefully reasonable response but good power should I want it and who eventually doesn't?? Also helped that Yavuz, Precision US and ST8E180 also thought this was the best way to go.

Good luck with it!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...