Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you looking for a 3076R equivalent then go the 0.63/ 5558 which is what I did from research and Unigroup's advice, if you looking for bigger, then consider the 6XXX series...

I spent a heap of time comparing numbers on this also.

For memory when I looked at this (I dont have the numbers on me) the 6262/6266 are pretty much similar to a GT3540 and the Precision 6466 is somewhere between a GT3540 and a TO4Z# .

Obviously how these would drive will also vary based on the rear housing size/ split pulse or not etc.

All the T3/T4 ones are, AFAIK.

If you got one of their garret copy items it would have a water cooled core (IE the T28/GT30 variant stuff).

I always assumed bb chra had oil and water cooling.

I guess no one has had many issues with it though.

What did you guys do with the water lines? Just link the feed to the return with a braided line or something?

Tune all done, ran out of pump (fuel) top end so we stopped there but I'm fairly happy with how it went... May chuck another pump in and see how it goes but I'm happy for now :)

PTE 6262 on stock bottom end RB26 with a Greddy 1.2mm head gasket and Greddy drop in cams

20130113_143508.jpg

Edited by SimonR32

Tune all done, ran out of pump (fuel) top end so we stopped there but I'm fairly happy with how it went... May chuck another pump in and see how it goes but I'm happy for now :)

PTE 6262 on stock bottom end RB26 with a Greddy 1.2mm head gasket and Greddy drop in cams

20130113_143508.jpg

Wow why u making so much power man- 450ish rwkw is it?? How much boost and no E85?

600hp at wheels? Very nice result gotta be extremely happy with that !!

Is that on caltex eflex ?

Sucrogen, we don't get E85 on pump over here :(

Wow why u making so much power man- 450ish rwkw is it?? How much boost and no E85?

About 450kw at the hubs yeah, boost is on the graph 1.6bar to beef up the mid range and 1.4 bar top end. It's running E85

Awesome results mate. Hurry up and go to the drags :)

I considered cams :)

Hows it feel on the road?

Maybe, depends if I can be stuffed. Cams should make a bit more power, if you do cams I'll do another pump :)

Only drove it about it 200m, gave it stick in 1st and 2nd, held on... Was good!

What rear housing is on the 6262?

T4 0.84 divided

Very nice power! Looks a bit laggier than a Gt3582r, which isn't really that bad news on a turbo that will make as much power as this if you tried pushing it :-)

We overlayed a few GT3582R graphs and they were similar response. Remember hub dyno makes things look lazier than a roller graph and the run was only started at 3000rpm so not much time to wind up the big girl. Could make big power with another pump though, would go close to 700 if we were crazy haha

The boost isn't falling over top end either, it's just we layed more boost into the mid range to beef up the torque. If we had held that boost through it would have run out of fuel (and probably make another 30-40hp)

We overlayed a few GT3582R graphs and they were similar response. Remember hub dyno makes things look lazier than a roller graph and the run was only started at 3000rpm so not much time to wind up the big girl. Could make big power with another pump though, would go close to 700 if we were crazy haha

The boost isn't falling over top end either, it's just we layed more boost into the mid range to beef up the torque. If we had held that boost through it would have run out of fuel (and probably make another 30-40hp)

sorry if ive missed it, wondering if that a stock bottem end?

We overlayed a few GT3582R graphs and they were similar response. Remember hub dyno makes things look lazier than a roller graph and the run was only started at 3000rpm so not much time to wind up the big girl. Could make big power with another pump though, would go close to 700 if we were crazy haha

The boost isn't falling over top end either, it's just we layed more boost into the mid range to beef up the torque. If we had held that boost through it would have run out of fuel (and probably make another 30-40hp)

Yeah it's pretty clear it has plenty more flow in it - no question of that, for the lag it'll make way more than a GT3582R. I am most familiar with hub dynos, and the .82a/r T3 single scroll GT3582Rs tend to be all on by around 4300-4500rpm so barely any more lag considering the extra power but I'd have guessed it to be noticeable.

Yeah it's pretty clear it has plenty more flow in it - no question of that, for the lag it'll make way more than a GT3582R. I am most familiar with hub dynos, and the .82a/r T3 single scroll GT3582Rs tend to be all on by around 4300-4500rpm so barely any more lag considering the extra power but I'd have guessed it to be noticeable.

Compared with the T88 it's noticeable haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...