Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pretty much my dilemma as I was saying on the last page, going off the dyno sheet on the 3.4L there isn't much in it and the top end gains are great.

From going by there website the 6262 was the first of that sort of series then they did the 6266 which is a touch bigger, then the 6766 which is bigger then a To4z then recently the 6466 which sits midway between 6266 and 6766.

And yeah I highly doubt you would notice the 600-700rpm difference (as quoted by a precision rep i spoke to) between a 6262 and a 6466. You literally wouldn't pick it by driving it I think you would only notice on a dyno graph as above considering how long it takes to jump 500rpm at the 4000rpmk mark on even a stock RB

And yeah I highly doubt you would notice the 600-700rpm difference (as quoted by a precision rep i spoke to) between a 6262 and a 6466. You literally wouldn't pick it by driving it I think you would only notice on a dyno graph as above considering how long it takes to jump 500rpm at the 4000rpmk mark on even a stock RB

Are you joking? 600-700rpm is a huge difference. That's about the difference between the T88 that was on my car and the 6262 I now have.

The T88 was horrible and I mean horrible on the street and even worse at the track while the 6262 is a great little zippy thing.

Well my 6262 is better than my old T04Z but not the miracle that some would lead you to believe. The 6466 is a fair wack bigger (195hp rated), I doubt you would be getting that for nothing :)

That's why I thought I'd ask, people have claimed that the PT6262 spools better than the GT3582R which sounds unlikely but who knows. The PT6466 is not far different in measurements to the T04Z and there is no lb/min rating for them - though Precision rate them at 900hp. Does that mean they can be used in place of a T51R Kai on a pump gas setup for someone looking for a bit more power with the same or less lag? It seems unlikely to me.... there isn't even any reason for me to have confidence that they'd make more on pump gas than a T04Z.

I'm trying to determine the place of the larger Precision turbos when huge boost and E85 isn't involved.

Are you joking? 600-700rpm is a huge difference. That's about the difference between the T88 that was on my car and the 6262 I now have.

The T88 was horrible and I mean horrible on the street and even worse at the track while the 6262 is a great little zippy thing.

the wheel sizes im camparison are a huge difference between the too aswell which is why i find it hard to believe that they are rating it that much laggier between the 62 and 64mm turbines

That's why I thought I'd ask, people have claimed that the PT6262 spools better than the GT3582R which sounds unlikely but who knows. The PT6466 is not far different in measurements to the T04Z and there is no lb/min rating for them - though Precision rate them at 900hp. Does that mean they can be used in place of a T51R Kai on a pump gas setup for someone looking for a bit more power with the same or less lag? It seems unlikely to me.... there isn't even any reason for me to have confidence that they'd make more on pump gas than a T04Z.

I'm trying to determine the place of the larger Precision turbos when huge boost and E85 isn't involved.

From my experience with my own engine, a certain boost pressure = very similar power level provided the turbo is still within its capabilities. When a turbo start to roll over of course the power gains decrease per psi. As you'd know pump fuel and 900hp are a mismatch (on a small engine anyway), as you will never be able to put the boost in that is required to get it in the zone.

I would certainly place my bets in saying that a 6466 will outspool a T51 donkey (sorry to all my friends who I have offended in saying that :devil: )

The test that Sound performance is a good example how different the 3 Precisions react even though they have identical exhaust wheels.

From my experience with my own engine, a certain boost pressure = very similar power level provided the turbo is still within its capabilities. When a turbo start to roll over of course the power gains decrease per psi. As you'd know pump fuel and 900hp are a mismatch (on a small engine anyway), as you will never be able to put the boost in that is required to get it in the zone.

Yep, same findings here too - well except for 900hp on pump fuel, I know a few mad men who have managed 900hp (flywheel estimated at least) on pump gas on RBs. Big turbos, lots of rpm and head porting involved of course.

I would certainly place my bets in saying that a 6466 will outspool a T51 donkey (sorry to all my friends who I have offended in saying that :devil: )

Hahahaha yeah you would REALLY hope it would outspool a T51R, though I would be extremely surprised if you could squeeze the same pump gas numbers out of an engine capable of it from a 6466 as a T51R.... and to be fair, would be interesting to see if the peak power numbers on race fuel would be comparable too. I wonder how those power ratings were determined...

The test that Sound performance is a good example how different the 3 Precisions react even though they have identical exhaust wheels.

Some of these tests make me really wish I had a dyno. A lot of these tests people refuse to touch timing etc to keep things equal, and I honestly haven't done enough first hand dyno tuning with like setups to ascertain whether this is a fair way of comparing or not. Will optimal timing be the same at the same load and rpm for every different turbo setup?

Some of these tests make me really wish I had a dyno. A lot of these tests people refuse to touch timing etc to keep things equal, and I honestly haven't done enough first hand dyno tuning with like setups to ascertain whether this is a fair way of comparing or not. Will optimal timing be the same at the same load and rpm for every different turbo setup?

Ive also always been wary of bolt on bolt off tests that crop up. Surely charge temp and turbine efficiency alone would leave a few degrees in the lurch between models.. Otherwise what is the point of spending an absolute packet on tuning? Time to jet up our cabys and change the chip in our MSD.

Get yourself a dyno Lith :) Once you have a place to sit and tune which belongs to you the customers will start lining up.

Here are some more results from this Saturday on the dyno. We were aiming for 35psi on the next hit, unfortunately the idle speed control screw of all things decided to unwind itself. It was already 9pm when we sorted it out so had to cut it short, but I am very confident in saying that we would have seen 1150whp.

Pretty amazing how linear the power curve is since it is making drag engine power. Rev limit is set to 9500rpm.

  • 2 weeks later...

Went for a drive yesterday (to get it licenced) and did some 4th gear flat road pulls from around 3000rpm, getting 1 bar at 3700-3800rpm which is probably a few hundred rpm better than my old GTR with a T04Z with similar top end power capability. Makes for a savage car on the road, pulls long and hard through the gears and is an absolute bullet.

Going to go back on the dyno after I sort out a second 044 and run it up again holding 1.6bar through the revs, should go 650hp (485kw) fairly easily by the looks :)

Here are some more results from this Saturday on the dyno. We were aiming for 35psi on the next hit, unfortunately the idle speed control screw of all things decided to unwind itself. It was already 9pm when we sorted it out so had to cut it short, but I am very confident in saying that we would have seen 1150whp.

Pretty amazing how linear the power curve is since it is making drag engine power. Rev limit is set to 9500rpm.

nice...

can you post a sheet? couldnt really see the figures prop.

where was it coming on boost?

  • 2 weeks later...

guys, i seem to be blowing out a bit of blue smoke on hard acceleration and shortly after

just wondering what could cause this

i am running -4 feed as per precision's recommendations and a hardline drain to -12 hose to the block

i thought precisions had in built restrictors or do i need to put one in??

Is yours BB or JB? And are you certain its oil smoke?

Check cooler plumbing and plugs for signs of oil leaking from the compressor side. Most leaky PT threads I have seen are comp side and the leak can be seen on idle with the pipes off.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...