Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good ? on comp Ratio as it hasnt been tested since the built to be honest it has sat in the shed for 3 years with doing nothing. It comes out sometimes & getz fair up it down this road I know quite well. Head work ported Polished supertech vavles. It made 450KW with the HKS To4Z strapped to the side of it with race Fuel 23psi.

Twin scroll ryan 4inch inlet & 3inch out from memory. Has 3.5 inch exhaust but not that thats going to matter its coming straight out of gate so should sound the goods lol.

Cool can't wait to see your results trying to decide whether the 6766 is going to be too small for my new 3.2L thats in the build ATM ;)

1000 flywheel hp or as close as I can't get with good spool

What fuel? If on E85 then the Precision PT6466 seems to be the man for shooting in that area - basically every result I've seen for that turbo have been exceptional "for what it is". PT6766 CEA will do it and with a bit of change and a bit more lag, Forced Performance GT3794HTA is not a Precision turbo but I reckon from what I've seen makes me think they have a compressor map more suited to RBs (and 2JZs) - a little wider flow in the 30-40psi boost range (the Precisions definitely need more boost to make these power levels), and they sound awesome. A SLIGHT (ie 100 or so rpm) bit more lag than the two Precision turbos though.

Going on a roller (dyno dynamics) tomorrow... Ewwww :(

I'll try and get a run on current tune with same fueling to see roller vs hubber before we play with boost

Awesome :)

+1 actually, I've been treating the difference between these two as ~11% (so 600hp @ hubs = 534whp/399rwkw) so will be interesting to see how close this is.

There used to be a fairly well proven 7-8% difference between the hub dyno and a roller, we could repeat it every time.

The hub dyno we use has now been updated with new software and corrections (the 600hp run was done with this) and they are meant to read similar now.

Ahh cool, good to know - I had partly based that number off what SAU people insisted when comparing hub dynos and otherwise but have been starting to get suspicious after seeing trap speeds of cars run on DD being much closer to cars with similar Dynapack numbers (ie, my own) but had used that partly because of avoiding angsty Aussies complaining about inflated numbers :)

Keen to hear the results anyway, especially when you nudge the boost up!

Well that was a bit of a fail, there is an issue with the dyno and even with 4wd set to 50/50 torque split the thing was doing burnouts as soon as it came on boost...

Ended up going 560hp but started spinning at 550hp and pretty much flat lined from there. Would have been well over 600awhp on 24psi if it had traction :)

Edited by SimonR32

Well that was a bit of a fail, there is an issue with the dyno and even with 4wd set to 50/50 torque split the thing was doing burnouts as soon as it came on boost...

Ended up going 560hp but started spinning at 550hp and pretty much flat lined from there. Would have been well over 600awhp on 24psi if it had traction :)

put 20 fat kids in the back! dont comment until we have results!!! :P

this is still with the 6262 yeah simon?

put 20 fat kids in the back! dont comment until we have results!!! :P

this is still with the 6262 yeah simon?

No access to 20 fat kids so it'll have to do. The power was almost ramping vertically when it started spinning and then hovered around 550awhp from 5500-8500.

Yeah 6262 T4 divided 0.8 rear

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah I suspect even if you hold airmass per cycle/cylinder constant if you get too far away from stock you're still going to have problems running the factory tune within the bounds of the factory load scale. Cams, different displacement/rod ratio, etc. I'm just lucky that the GTIII-SS with wastegate boost + CA compliance cats is pretty much equivalent to stock turbos. When I have actual space I can finally get it tuned and modify the fuel system for flex fuel to 100% handle any detonation concerns when cranking the boost to whatever those dinky turbos can put out.
    • I would say no, why, because my daughter, who also lives in Goulburn, hasn't recommended us going there Pity, as we miss all the German joints around in Sydney, actually, the restaurants are the only thing I really miss about Sydney, and a special mention to Ishibanboshi at Bondi Junction, their Kara-age Don is heart cloggingly deliciousness (always added a special boiled egg...or 2) 😋 
    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around without a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
    • Yep, this bit another local owner. I caught it before putting the transmission back into the car, what I noticed was the pressure plate fingers weren't flat and even. It's more obvious with the pull style clutch because the throwout bearing ring was visibly not flat once everything is put together. Nismo should really update their instructions to call out this specific detail. I'm not even sure the clutch as-shipped orients everything properly.
×
×
  • Create New...