Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol, im keen to try a 6766, but even with the modern tech, i have a funny feeling it wont outperform/or be as good as my old gt4294 setup

have to wait for this 6870 maybe. Pity Pt wont make custom turbos a 6775 would work well...

Outperform/be as good as is a relative term. The cool thing about a lot of these turbos is the size difference - I almost had to eat my hat (thanks Nytsky) its pretty cool that a 64mm/66mm turbo can make the same kind of power as a 70mm/71mm hero turbo of the previous decade... there is no that that is not giong to have a really noticeable difference in the real world. Aside from "that sound" I'd much rather have that response of the 6466 and the same power as the T51R Kai, quite keen to see results from FP's take on the 6466 which has now been released - they are clearly taking aim at the Precision unit and their turbos in that size range are often quite rowdy, if they can do something to rival the 6466 in all relevant ways then that would rule :D

Precision already do a PT6768, and FP do a "6868" (Super 94HTA) using an aggressive (flow versus size) turbine design so there is already something on the market for that kind of target, but yeah - I think decent built RBs probably need something with more turbine than the likes of the 6766, depending on what you are looking for.

yes it is definitly a relative term Lith. yeh the 68 turbine is a q trim wheel, looks like when they updated from the 65 to the 66, it probally made it

a little redundant though maybe?.

i was thinking in auto Rb30 terms., with the extra load a bigger turbine would keep the egt in check and make the motor a whole lot happier in the tune up ,the 6766 is no

doubt always going to choke on a Rb30 in the turbine section and not the compressor side with 93lb of flow id guess.

although some of the 2j supra results are outstanding..

Can't wait for this 6870 deal..

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Hi Dave

A long time coming but here is the difference from the T78 and the PT6262 and it drive like a different car, clutch is easy with a bit of power down low :)

Brown = new tune

Blue = old tune

so it takes 23psi to make 333kws thought it would be running close to 350-360kws at that boost pressure is yours twin scroll? Dave hurry and chuck the results for the RB25 on twinscroll.

Still awaiting the retune results on my 6466 on my 25/30 motor. Hopefully some decent numbers

Thought I'd update this thread to for those not following my build.

Got mine tuned Friday :My 6466 went 630hp on 29psi but was lifting the head. Ended up winding it back to 451hp on 15psi for now till we can get in there and sus out the problem. Car already had ARP studs. Dyno graphs to follow

so it takes 23psi to make 333kws thought it would be running close to 350-360kws at that boost pressure is yours twin scroll? Dave hurry and chuck the results for the RB25 on twinscroll.

Expected 350-360 as well, said the exhaust is very restrictive , having a custom done.

It was also having a fuel problem, not sure if this made any difference??

They said that tuning for response you loose some top end power ??

New to this so I can only take the word of a professional tuner.

If you could have driven this car before and now you would be like me, happy :)

Pete,

I'm just finishing off a carbon fibre custom catch can setup, got mines baffles and -12AN speedflow lines to help everything breath a bit better.
Saying that it's almost finished and once all assembled will be dropped off for head removal and the last few bits going in.

I'll update this thread with results as soon as it hits the rollers.

First half of the catch can setup for those interested in pics

Cheers Noy


post-25424-0-41503500-1399905898_thumb.jpg

post-25424-0-72596900-1399905995_thumb.jpg

Well had the exhaust done, did not pick up much power but it helped where I wanted it, response.

since I changed the Turbo,Cams and Exhaust the car has gone from a pig to drive to being fun, enough up top and good bottom response,street drive :)

Here is the latest Dyno

New Dyno 345.4 KW

Red = Boost off

Blue = Low Boost

Orange = High Boost

Old T78 = 337.9KW

post-134126-0-03217500-1400530920_thumb.gif

post-134126-0-67791600-1400531398_thumb.png

Pete,

I'm just finishing off a carbon fibre custom catch can setup, got mines baffles and -12AN speedflow lines to help everything breath a bit better.

Saying that it's almost finished and once all assembled will be dropped off for head removal and the last few bits going in.

I'll update this thread with results as soon as it hits the rollers.

First half of the catch can setup for those interested in pics

Cheers Noy

Hi Noy

Like to see the results when you are finished, as for me I am done with the mods, the car is driving very well for a DD and that is what I wanted . I have a 350GT Skyline (Jap Import), I put APS Twin Turbo system on it and with the extra torque it made the R34GTR seem crappy and it was a "thing" to drive BUT all good now :)

One thing left to do I am putting 18" Advan RS-D , machine lip/ gloss black spokes, have a look on their site and tell me what you think

Pete

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
×
×
  • Create New...