Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol, im keen to try a 6766, but even with the modern tech, i have a funny feeling it wont outperform/or be as good as my old gt4294 setup

have to wait for this 6870 maybe. Pity Pt wont make custom turbos a 6775 would work well...

Outperform/be as good as is a relative term. The cool thing about a lot of these turbos is the size difference - I almost had to eat my hat (thanks Nytsky) its pretty cool that a 64mm/66mm turbo can make the same kind of power as a 70mm/71mm hero turbo of the previous decade... there is no that that is not giong to have a really noticeable difference in the real world. Aside from "that sound" I'd much rather have that response of the 6466 and the same power as the T51R Kai, quite keen to see results from FP's take on the 6466 which has now been released - they are clearly taking aim at the Precision unit and their turbos in that size range are often quite rowdy, if they can do something to rival the 6466 in all relevant ways then that would rule :D

Precision already do a PT6768, and FP do a "6868" (Super 94HTA) using an aggressive (flow versus size) turbine design so there is already something on the market for that kind of target, but yeah - I think decent built RBs probably need something with more turbine than the likes of the 6766, depending on what you are looking for.

yes it is definitly a relative term Lith. yeh the 68 turbine is a q trim wheel, looks like when they updated from the 65 to the 66, it probally made it

a little redundant though maybe?.

i was thinking in auto Rb30 terms., with the extra load a bigger turbine would keep the egt in check and make the motor a whole lot happier in the tune up ,the 6766 is no

doubt always going to choke on a Rb30 in the turbine section and not the compressor side with 93lb of flow id guess.

although some of the 2j supra results are outstanding..

Can't wait for this 6870 deal..

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Hi Dave

A long time coming but here is the difference from the T78 and the PT6262 and it drive like a different car, clutch is easy with a bit of power down low :)

Brown = new tune

Blue = old tune

so it takes 23psi to make 333kws thought it would be running close to 350-360kws at that boost pressure is yours twin scroll? Dave hurry and chuck the results for the RB25 on twinscroll.

Still awaiting the retune results on my 6466 on my 25/30 motor. Hopefully some decent numbers

Thought I'd update this thread to for those not following my build.

Got mine tuned Friday :My 6466 went 630hp on 29psi but was lifting the head. Ended up winding it back to 451hp on 15psi for now till we can get in there and sus out the problem. Car already had ARP studs. Dyno graphs to follow

so it takes 23psi to make 333kws thought it would be running close to 350-360kws at that boost pressure is yours twin scroll? Dave hurry and chuck the results for the RB25 on twinscroll.

Expected 350-360 as well, said the exhaust is very restrictive , having a custom done.

It was also having a fuel problem, not sure if this made any difference??

They said that tuning for response you loose some top end power ??

New to this so I can only take the word of a professional tuner.

If you could have driven this car before and now you would be like me, happy :)

Pete,

I'm just finishing off a carbon fibre custom catch can setup, got mines baffles and -12AN speedflow lines to help everything breath a bit better.
Saying that it's almost finished and once all assembled will be dropped off for head removal and the last few bits going in.

I'll update this thread with results as soon as it hits the rollers.

First half of the catch can setup for those interested in pics

Cheers Noy


post-25424-0-41503500-1399905898_thumb.jpg

post-25424-0-72596900-1399905995_thumb.jpg

Well had the exhaust done, did not pick up much power but it helped where I wanted it, response.

since I changed the Turbo,Cams and Exhaust the car has gone from a pig to drive to being fun, enough up top and good bottom response,street drive :)

Here is the latest Dyno

New Dyno 345.4 KW

Red = Boost off

Blue = Low Boost

Orange = High Boost

Old T78 = 337.9KW

post-134126-0-03217500-1400530920_thumb.gif

post-134126-0-67791600-1400531398_thumb.png

Pete,

I'm just finishing off a carbon fibre custom catch can setup, got mines baffles and -12AN speedflow lines to help everything breath a bit better.

Saying that it's almost finished and once all assembled will be dropped off for head removal and the last few bits going in.

I'll update this thread with results as soon as it hits the rollers.

First half of the catch can setup for those interested in pics

Cheers Noy

Hi Noy

Like to see the results when you are finished, as for me I am done with the mods, the car is driving very well for a DD and that is what I wanted . I have a 350GT Skyline (Jap Import), I put APS Twin Turbo system on it and with the extra torque it made the R34GTR seem crappy and it was a "thing" to drive BUT all good now :)

One thing left to do I am putting 18" Advan RS-D , machine lip/ gloss black spokes, have a look on their site and tell me what you think

Pete

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
    • There are guys on Facebook under, Infiniti Owners Australia   https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1Z3RbPqx4k/?mibextid=wwXIfr What Whp are you after and I can help, and join this Q group in the states. https://www.facebook.com/share/g/19A59cN3JR/?mibextid=wwXIfr
×
×
  • Create New...