Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, ido09s said:

fark me, 49psi!!!!! what fuel?

I am hoping to make 550rwkw at 30 odd psi with a 6766. I currently make 485rwkw at 23psi and the car runs 138mph all day long which is the true dyno ;)

Is that on a 2.6? 

  • Like 1
9 hours ago, ido09s said:

fark me, 49psi!!!!! what fuel?

I am hoping to make 550rwkw at 30 odd psi with a 6766. I currently make 485rwkw at 23psi and the car runs 138mph all day long which is the true dyno ;)

Which ar?T4 ? 

Had my car on the dyno yesterday.. 570hp on 20psi,

Built 25 with the gen 2 6266 t3 .82

Currently the car is blowing alittle smoke on idle (typical precision?) so i wanna get that sorted aswell as a cas syncing issue before turning it up alittle more... 

Other then that im stoked with how it drives and comes on

IMG_7808.JPG

Edited by azzada1
  • 1 month later...
12 hours ago, acr said:

Do you think it will be possible to make around 700kw from a 6870 - h cover 1.15 rear on at rb28. Head has been ported and built? Trying to keep under 40psi. 

No one else has weighed in so I'll bite :)  Those turbos have been proven to make that power and more @ wheels on the "right dyno".   I personally wouldn't expect that kind of number on a Mainline or a Dyno Dynamics, but a Dynojet or Dynapack I'd say is plausible IF the engine spec and all supporting mods are up to it.    

E85 would be a must, btw.

Edited by Lithium

From my vague memory I've seen one do 700kw on a Dyno Dynamics fairly easily, may have been just under but not much (I was replacing my gearbox at the time so was a little distracted). That was a 2.8L and from memory around a 1.0 rear

12 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

From my vague memory I've seen one do 700kw on a Dyno Dynamics fairly easily, may have been just under but not much (I was replacing my gearbox at the time so was a little distracted). That was a 2.8L and from memory around a 1.0 rear

Sweet, that's good to know - I'm always cautious setting expectations on those dynos, people have gone >1000whp on other more popular breeds of dyno but its hard to know how to convert.

I reckon you will make it, but you'll need around 40psi these turbos love boost. I'm using 6870 1.0 rear just made 488hp on 15psi 98 pump fuel. Nothing to serious as it's just a run in tune my motor is only 2.7 and not built for 98 pump. Also it was on a mainline dyno 4wd

Edited by QUP29
  • 4 weeks later...
On ‎15‎/‎12‎/‎2016 at 2:41 PM, azzada1 said:

Had my car on the dyno yesterday.. 570hp on 20psi,

Built 25 with the gen 2 6266 t3 .82

Currently the car is blowing alittle smoke on idle (typical precision?) so i wanna get that sorted aswell as a cas syncing issue before turning it up alittle more... 

Other then that im stoked with how it drives and comes on

IMG_7808.JPG

Ok after getting frustrated with the smoke on idle and struggling to believe it was the brand new turbo with an inline oil filter I pulled the motor down and came across afew problems from when it was first assembled.. oil rings weren't to flash, acl pistons had hit and snapped off 5 of 6 oil squirters and we also found some glass beads in the head... frustrating but at least we found the real issues and tbh the motor was cheaper then the turbo..

My Reason for this post was to clarify that the smoke was not in fact the turbo, However if I hadn't had the inline filter I fear the turbo may have been damaged and needed a rebuild, the filter caught about 5 small pieces of glass and sand.. For the $80 it costs for the earls filter it seems almost stupid not to run it as insurance.

The motor has been rebuilt now and I've ordered a ross trigger kit to eliminate the CAS issues, I look forward to turning it up to see what the 6266 can do on 25-30psi on the rb25.

  • 2 months later...

If anyone is chasing a new 7685 (waiting list at most places), I've got a brand new (test-fitted only) 7685 gen 2, dual ball-bearing, 1.12 ceramic coated exhaust housing. Should crack 1000whp with correct supporting mods.

Chasing $4800 (RRP is around $5500) or swap for a 6870 gen 2 (prefer 1.15 twinscroll rear) with cash my way.

PM me if interested.

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...