Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6466 + stroker = loves it. Ignition breaking down over 29 pounds so this was the limit. I think it will do for now. :)

What's redline on this?

Looks like it will want to break things. Lots.

I want one.

Well had the exhaust done, did not pick up much power but it helped where I wanted it, response.

since I changed the Turbo,Cams and Exhaust the car has gone from a pig to drive to being fun, enough up top and good bottom response,street drive :)

Here is the latest Dyno

New Dyno 345.4 KW

Red = Boost off

Blue = Low Boost

Orange = High Boost

Old T78 = 337.9KW

That is a significant different there in where peak torque is made, good job.

Poor old T78 :) Did you end up getting my PM?

Epic result Mitch must be an animal?

That on a 3.4L?

Is it in an R?

She's a beast on the road, i love it more and more each time I drive it.. Yep 3.4L kit in my R34 GTT.

What's redline on this?

Looks like it will want to break things. Lots.

I want one.

Upped the limiter to 8000 now. Peak power is at around 7400. The whole driveline has been upgraded so here's to hoping it doesn't break anything!

  • 1 month later...

That is a significant different there in where peak torque is made, good job.

Poor old T78 :) Did you end up getting my PM?

Hi Micheal

Sold the T78 and the bloke is happy, crap it was just about new, well 5 years ago and only 3000Klms on the car since it was installed

No I did not get your PM as it would come in on this Laptop, it does not allow me to gain access to anything other than threads and posts, but better than nothing. If you would like get me as TT350GT I can access everything on my PC.

I have caught the Mod bug and going to have the RB30/Nitto 3.2 Stroker kit shoved into it, keeping the PT6262 may get a bigger back housing and go for response, it is a DD and I want it to be what I thought it was when I bought it.

I have to say that since the last modifications I got to love it but need more and might have to come out of retirement to pay for it,bloody cars ,haha

post-134126-0-12817500-1404283972_thumb.jpg

post-134126-0-39452800-1404284021_thumb.jpg

I have caught the Mod bug and going to have the RB30/Nitto 3.2 Stroker kit shoved into it, keeping the PT6262 may get a bigger back housing and go for response, it is a DD and I want it to be what I thought it was when I bought it. I have to say that since the last modifications I got to love it but need more and might have to come out of retirement to pay for it,bloody cars ,haha

Haha, that's great :D can't wait to see how it turns out!

  • 2 months later...

does anyone know if precision will release a gen 2 6766 or a tubo slightly bigger than a 67 but still retain twin scroll, as anything larger than a 67 seems to be only able to be bought with a single entry rear housing.

7175? Or FP Super94 :P

  • 2 months later...

OK so the Precision PT6870 CEA is out now - from the initial testing it is serious serious serious business, ultra impressive.

See here: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?859938-PTE-6870-CEA-GEN2-Test-Results-by-Sound-Performance

PT7275 versus PT6870 (all testing on the same engine setup):

7275div981010whpvs6870811059whp_zps5ba3a

PT6766 versus PT6870

676681949whpvs6870811059whp_zpsb7426611.

Spool comparison:

PT6870SpoolComparison_zpsa6432d6b.jpg

Those dyno results are all "max effort" on a good motor and high ethanol percentages, so likely to do them all justice. The spool and the relative power versus the 6766 and 7275 impress the hell out of me, nuts.

Yep, quite interesting. All results were impressive, though that particularly made me think of the GTX3067R result someone on here got.

Not sure if referring to my GTX3067 result, or typo, but nonetheless also found the results of 0.81 v 0.96 very interesting.

Below quote from the original page in particular:

The .96 A/R only added lag and if you reference the boost spool comparison below, we also weren't able to see as much boost with the duty cycle all-in. This tells us that we were at a limitation of the compressor wheel flow itself and not because of back pressure.

Not always beneficial to go larger A/R it seems.

Anyways, sorry to digress from subject of thread. Thanks Lithium for posting above info.

Keen to max out a 6870! Hopefully they release divided housings for them sometime soon. Certainly looks good on paper, gotta love those GST yankee figures as always :)

6766 rated to 935hp, makes 949hp atw.

Yeah those numbers seemed high for a 6766 on a Mustang, though I am still shocked that people are taking hp ratings as some kind of gospel. How much did you make atw on your old GT3076R? And what are GT3076Rs rated at?

The 6870 is certainly looking the goods, no matter how you slice it. Would have loved to have seen FPs Super94/99s on more things - they are in T4 twin scroll and imho until this came along the best thing since sliced bread for the ">6766 power without going BIG frame".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...