Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Thinking of putting a forward facing plenem on my rb25

looking at gettting either a plazmaman or greddy one..??

Any experience, and or advice, iz it worth it, there performance or dificalty putting them in ect..

Would be great..

Cheers Troy..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/315700-plazmaman-plenem-vs-greddy/
Share on other sites

Hi Troy,

I have this conversation with many customers and we have tested both back to back to determine the pros and cons. The main difference is that the Plazmaman retains the standard runners, where the Greddy has shorter runners incorperated into the unit. This design feature of the Greddy in simple terms, creates more top end power at the expense of mid range torque. The longer factory runners helps bring boost on at an earlier rpm (have seen 300-500rpm better spool!!!) so if you want your turbo to spool faster, make more useable mid range power/torque but miss out on a little bit of peak hp, then the Plazmaman is for you. If you only care about the number on the dyno, get the Greddy.

I would sell 20 plazmaman plenums for every Greddy unit.

NB: Do not buy a Greddy copy unless you have a guarantee from your supplier that is will not leak coolant. We had a number of customer supplied copies that were nothing but trouble and cost the customer heaps more by the time it was fitted.

Hope this helps, if you have any questions feel free to PM me any time.

Cheers,

Trent Whyte

MERCURY MOTORSPORT

  • Like 1

Unfortunately not (we generally go from standard straight to Hypertune (single throttle)), although I would expect there to not be a massive difference as the RB26 has short runners as standard so there isnt a dramatic difference like on the RB25.

Actually, an interesting point, is that an RB25 with a GT35R on it will achieve full boost earlier than an RB26 with the same turbo kit, even though the RB25 has a smaller capacity. This is a combination of the VVTi and also the longer runners on the inlet manifold of the RB25. The RB26 will probably make more peak power and it also has more revs to work with.

I did back to back with stock vs greddy. Same as above, the differance in mid-range was enormous.

Only thing greddy has going for it is the short cooler piping.

But that's where the palaz plenum comes in. If only it wasn't so expensive.

Hi Troy,

I have this conversation with many customers and we have tested both back to back to determine the pros and cons. The main difference is that the Plazmaman retains the standard runners, where the Greddy has shorter runners incorperated into the unit. This design feature of the Greddy in simple terms, creates more top end power at the expense of mid range torque. The longer factory runners helps bring boost on at an earlier rpm (have seen 300-500rpm better spool!!!) so if you want your turbo to spool faster, make more useable mid range power/torque but miss out on a little bit of peak hp, then the Plazmaman is for you. If you only care about the number on the dyno, get the Greddy.

I would sell 20 plazmaman plenums for every Greddy unit.

NB: Do not buy a Greddy copy unless you have a guarantee from your supplier that is will not leak coolant. We had a number of customer supplied copies that were nothing but trouble and cost the customer heaps more by the time it was fitted.

Hope this helps, if you have any questions feel free to PM me any time.

Cheers,

Trent Whyte

MERCURY MOTORSPORT

Good post!

Hi Trent

What gains have you seen with the Plazmaman plenum vs standard plenum?

Gains vary from car to car as there are usually a bunch of things that can be improved to improve performance. If I was to quote a figure, I would say 10-20kw is possible, however the more power you are making, the more effective the upgrade becomes. I wouldn't personally run out and get one for a car with a standard turbo, but as part of a well put together package, the plazmaman stuff works really really well.

We have a number of cars making big numbers with them. One is on a VC commodore that we are still developing that has a standard NEO RB25DET engine (plus a nitto dbs head gasket and arp studs) running a GT45R turbo on a 6Boost manifold and it is making 587hp @ wheels on 25psi (e85). The other is a RB25/30 with a GT4094R running 30psi on E85 making 633hp in a R32 GTST, which just ran a 10.4@135mph in full trim. Both of these cars use the plazmaman setup and both enjoy the response of the longer runners (yes the 45R is laggy, but we are fixing that with a ZEX nitrous spool kit!)

Just another little note, the RB25/30 with the GT40R is more responsive than a standard RB25 with a GT3076R and makes heaps more power!!! Just goes to show that bigger doesn't have to be laggier!!

Gains vary from car to car as there are usually a bunch of things that can be improved to improve performance. If I was to quote a figure, I would say 10-20kw i

Just another little note, the RB25/30 with the GT40R is more responsive than a standard RB25 with a GT3076R and makes heaps more power!!! Just goes to show that bigger doesn't have to be laggier!!

Hi Trent,

Thats a very interesting eye opener...I'm beginning a 25/30 build and was skewed to the GT3076R particularly because of all the feedback on the forum on this turbo on a 25 or 25/30. Would you mind sharing how early the GT40R comes on boost/full boost on a 25/30?

Cheers! :cool:

Hi Trent,

Thats a very interesting eye opener...I'm beginning a 25/30 build and was skewed to the GT3076R particularly because of all the feedback on the forum on this turbo on a 25 or 25/30. Would you mind sharing how early the GT40R comes on boost/full boost on a 25/30?

Cheers! :cool:

I will try and post up some graphs but it might take a little while....I have a bit on and I am a retard with the scanner! :(

At the end of the day, you need to choose a turbo that suits your goals. Don't pick one that people are raving about just because it is popular. Lets say for your build you might have a particular hp goal, or a full boost by XXXXrpm goal, so for your combination of parts that you are using, you need to pick a turbo that will perform how you want. EVERY PERSON IS DIFFERENT, so decide what is important to you and your goals, then work towards them. Hopefully you will get lots of advice from people like me, who do these modifications for a living. Our experience is your gain, so find a workshop that you feel comfortable with and give them as much information as you can and let them offer advice, examples of combinations they have done before and suggestions that can improve your setup. It will only aid your outcome.

I guess the other thing you need to remember is BE REALISTIC with your goals. If you want 500hp, then go for it. If you want 300hp, then thats fine too. Don't get caught up in the ego dyno graph challenge. At the end of the day, YOU need to live with the car, so it has to please you. My job is to recommend solutions that are suitable for you. We build the car for YOU, YOUR DREAM, not for us. Its a big difference.

We don't make millions of dollars in this industry, we do it more for the passion of it over just making money (trust me, I turned my back on a lucrative Engineering career to follow my passion of jap perf cars). So chances are, we love cars just as much as you, so we can talk about then non-stop, just like you. :)

good posts trent :cool:

one other thing that should be mentioned is that forward facing plenum(s) are more responsive than standard due to less piping involved

This is true for on/off/on throttle response. There is negligible difference when looking at dyno graphs at wide open throttle in terms of the boost line (unless the plenum has changed the result, not the piping).

I always wanted a Greddy plenum on my RB25 (hairstyles I guess) till I saw how well put together the Plazmaman stuff is and recognised how good the stock RB25 runners are for almost every application.

Interesting , I must have another look at Oyays RB25 plenum .

I imagine its a lot less involved than changing the whole manifold over and more easily reversed if needed for any reason .

For the record can the std throttle body be used in place of the pretty , expensive , one ?

Lastly the real "Greedy" one is quite expensive so the PM one must be real expensive .

I suppose you have to factor in the fitting antics of the GReady one so all up maybe similar ?

Cheers Adrian .

dont underestimate the greddy. I have egt sensors in my exhaust manifold and the tuner was very impressed with the evenness of the temperatures across the cylinder range. That tells me I am getting a good even fuel distribution across all 6 pots.

This is in no way a slight at the Plazmaman product, it may well do the same but i aint changing to find out.

Interesting , I must have another look at Oyays RB25 plenum .

I imagine its a lot less involved than changing the whole manifold over and more easily reversed if needed for any reason .

For the record can the std throttle body be used in place of the pretty , expensive , one ?

Lastly the real "Greedy" one is quite expensive so the PM one must be real expensive .

I suppose you have to factor in the fitting antics of the GReady one so all up maybe similar ?

Cheers Adrian .

greedy one bolts on as well with everything suppied

I had a looky here .

http://www.plazmaman.com/shop/index.php?ac...m&itemId=17

Does anyone here have closer pics of the Plasmaman plenum , I'd like to see where the fittings and IAC assembly goes .

I reckon if I got one I'd want it in innocent flat black .

I did ask recently about what size the std R33 25T TB is but cant remember .

On PMs manifold did your customers use anything larger than std and if so were there any negative results .

Just for the record my R33 has porting/OS exhaust valves/approx 9.2CR/Poncams/740 Nismos/PFC and a GT3076R 52T 0.82 A/R IW turbo to fit .

I like the sound of anything that improves an engines mid range so I'm all ears .

With a pipe kit and an OE GTR intercooler I'd like to have a reasonably responsive 270+ at the wheels .

Doable I think .

Gotta salt the Woolafs tail , cheers A .

Well it sounds like you have a smiliar setup to mine. Built head, Poncams etc.

My car makes boost quicker than any skyline I have been in.

As for the fittings. All fittings are down the middle (drivers side) and there is one on the passengers side. The other fittings for your brake booster, IAC etc are in near stock locations.

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...