Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys this week ill be purchasing some new 265x35x18 for my R34 GT-T with approx 200kw.

My budget is max $250 a tyre and for that price range from the reviews ive read its either Kumho KU31 and KU36.

I don't do any track days, but i love the feel when you hit a gear and your not facing houses :)

Both tyres are roughly the same price. Just wondering what you guys would choose if you were in my situation & please if you know of another tyre within my price range please feel free to recommend one.

Much apperciated. Terry. :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/316191-kumho-ku31-or-ku36-help/
Share on other sites

I'm in the same position as you. I've decided I'm going with KU31's though.

Semi slick IMO is a bit overkill for the street unless your running some pretty high hp which I am not plus I wanted better tread wear

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ku...ct-t302712.html

Edited by Dani Boi

i have ku31's on my r34 and they are pretty good. dry grip is great and in the wet they have kept me away from poles when turning. accidentally boosted too one time while raining to overtake someone and they regained traction pretty fast

Comparing the two how do they perform in the wet/dry?

In regards to the wear how many k's roughly do you think you will get with each tire?

Personally I havent got experience with them at all to comment on wet/dry but my previous comment was based on talking to people who used them before.

Your 2nd question is a million dollar question. Depending on how you drive and if you rotate your tyres at all. I know of someone that got more than 40,000km out of a 36 but that with rotation (still not bald yet). On the other hand, another friend with 36 only got 20,000km+ because he doesnt rotate and he track his car occasionally (bald).

Go the 31's - more suited for street

The 36's are not a dedicated semi slick - the tread pattern is that of a semi slick but the tyre compound is not as soft a a semi slick

Not always the case.

Comparing real semi's to 'road' semi's like KU36's is more about construction than tyre compound.

I reckon the 36's are about as soft as my advan AO50's and bridgestone RE55's (real semis), but if I was doing track work the KU36 would be destroyed and the AO50 or RE55 would be only half as worn. It all comes down to heat really.

DRFT31 - Depends how often you wanna replace tyres really. KU36's will wear a lot more. How deep are your pockets?

My opinion - 200rwkw's go the 31's. They're 265's afterall, how much grip do you need?

Try Traction tyres, or option 1, or OTR motorsport for prices.

Comparing real semi's to 'road' semi's like KU36's is more about construction than tyre compound.

I reckon the 36's are about as soft as my advan AO50's and bridgestone RE55's (real semis), but if I was doing track work the KU36 would be destroyed and the AO50 or RE55 would be only half as worn. It all comes down to heat really.

The treadwear ratings of S spec (like KU36) and R spec (like RE55s) are completely different (about 180 vs about 60). All things being equal the KU36s will last far longer on the street. RT-615s which i imagine are similar to KU36s, dont get chopped up like street tyres when used at the track.

Not always the case.

Comparing real semi's to 'road' semi's like KU36's is more about construction than tyre compound.

I reckon the 36's are about as soft as my advan AO50's and bridgestone RE55's (real semis)

they're not

but if I was doing track work the KU36 would be destroyed and the AO50 or RE55 would be only half as worn. It all comes down to heat really.

and they don't

KU36 outlast the much softer proper semis on the track as well as the road.

they're not

and they don't

KU36 outlast the much softer proper semis on the track as well as the road.

Ok well I was only going by the wear that I have seen on mine and others KU36's vs my AO50's on a 32 GTSt.

I did one motorkhana and the KU36's were great but wore a lot and most of that was on a concrete skid pan! My AO50's have done multiple track days and haven't gone down much at all???

We've obviously had different experiences then.

ive got ku31's in 265 on the rear. theyre a great tyre. you cant go past them for the price.

dry grip is excellent. wet grip is quite satisfactory. i mean really, how good can wet grip ever be? and if you're driving like a maniac in the wet, then you need to look at other things. such as dont be a douche.

Edited by Munkyb0y
Ok well I was only going by the wear that I have seen on mine and others KU36's vs my AO50's on a 32 GTSt.

I did one motorkhana and the KU36's were great but wore a lot and most of that was on a concrete skid pan! My AO50's have done multiple track days and haven't gone down much at all???

We've obviously had different experiences then.

so did your tyres. motorkhanas vs track days.

after the first track day (Lakeside) on my 1520kg Supra the KU36 had barely worn at all. Could still read the writing on the tread surface! It must have done a dozen track days (heaps at Lakeside, 1 each at QR, EC, & OP) & 15,000km on the road. The front were still going strong, rears were just down to the TWI.

my R888s (GG compound) which have only done 3 track days at Lakeside and 0 road km on an ~1100kg S13 are more than half worn! The lefts are just at the TWI now! And the internet would have you believe the R888 is one of the more durable semis around...

and there is certainly no doubt about the compounds being much harder on the KU36. All you have to do is look at the UTQG ratings.

  • 4 weeks later...

hi, dont know if youve purchased yet, another thing to keep in mind is the ku36 is assymetric design, you can rotate side to side

the ku31 is directional, you can rotate front to back

but, you can swap the tyre round 180 degrees if wearing one edge(ku31)

in regards to traction, it doesnt all come down to power, how hard do you corner normally?

the 2 different tyres are designed to do 2 different things.

ku36 will be great for someone who pushes their car a little harder.

if you drive more sedatley, grab the 31's, they'll last longer.

I have KU36's they are not a semi slick they are extreme performance dry tyres not intended for wet use but they can get you home if you drive ultra carefully.

I would suggest KU31's they way to go for a street car as the KU36's are horrible in the wet, they have poor feedback and they randomly let go even when maintaing constant speed around a constant radius corner.

KU36's great in the dry once they have a very small amount of heat into them but not as nice in terms of ride, noise and feel/feedback compared to all weather tyres.

They wont last as long as KU31's with the same car same driver under normal street conditions.

Personally I havent got experience with them at all to comment on wet/dry but my previous comment was based on talking to people who used them before.

Your 2nd question is a million dollar question. Depending on how you drive and if you rotate your tyres at all. I know of someone that got more than 40,000km out of a 36 but that with rotation (still not bald yet). On the other hand, another friend with 36 only got 20,000km+ because he doesnt rotate and he track his car occasionally (bald).

I usually get 3,000km out of a brand new set of rears, so sounds like the 36s should be fine :D Wish I could get 20-40k out of them, but that would be so boring lol.

I had KU31's

performed very well in the wet and dry, awesome tyre for the price i thought

the only reason I dont have them on the car now is cause i needed tyres and couldnt get KU31's for under 800 bucks for a set of rears so had to go a cheaper option, found a place to source them cheap now so next time will definently get them again

I run KU36 on the front and KU31 on the rear, even though the KU31 is the cheaper out of the two ($160 per side fitted and balanced 255/40/17) they grip better than my previous Toyo Proxes 4 which costed 1.5x the price

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...