Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys this week ill be purchasing some new 265x35x18 for my R34 GT-T with approx 200kw.

My budget is max $250 a tyre and for that price range from the reviews ive read its either Kumho KU31 and KU36.

I don't do any track days, but i love the feel when you hit a gear and your not facing houses :)

Both tyres are roughly the same price. Just wondering what you guys would choose if you were in my situation & please if you know of another tyre within my price range please feel free to recommend one.

Much apperciated. Terry. :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/316191-kumho-ku31-or-ku36-help/
Share on other sites

I'm in the same position as you. I've decided I'm going with KU31's though.

Semi slick IMO is a bit overkill for the street unless your running some pretty high hp which I am not plus I wanted better tread wear

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ku...ct-t302712.html

Edited by Dani Boi

i have ku31's on my r34 and they are pretty good. dry grip is great and in the wet they have kept me away from poles when turning. accidentally boosted too one time while raining to overtake someone and they regained traction pretty fast

Comparing the two how do they perform in the wet/dry?

In regards to the wear how many k's roughly do you think you will get with each tire?

Personally I havent got experience with them at all to comment on wet/dry but my previous comment was based on talking to people who used them before.

Your 2nd question is a million dollar question. Depending on how you drive and if you rotate your tyres at all. I know of someone that got more than 40,000km out of a 36 but that with rotation (still not bald yet). On the other hand, another friend with 36 only got 20,000km+ because he doesnt rotate and he track his car occasionally (bald).

Go the 31's - more suited for street

The 36's are not a dedicated semi slick - the tread pattern is that of a semi slick but the tyre compound is not as soft a a semi slick

Not always the case.

Comparing real semi's to 'road' semi's like KU36's is more about construction than tyre compound.

I reckon the 36's are about as soft as my advan AO50's and bridgestone RE55's (real semis), but if I was doing track work the KU36 would be destroyed and the AO50 or RE55 would be only half as worn. It all comes down to heat really.

DRFT31 - Depends how often you wanna replace tyres really. KU36's will wear a lot more. How deep are your pockets?

My opinion - 200rwkw's go the 31's. They're 265's afterall, how much grip do you need?

Try Traction tyres, or option 1, or OTR motorsport for prices.

Comparing real semi's to 'road' semi's like KU36's is more about construction than tyre compound.

I reckon the 36's are about as soft as my advan AO50's and bridgestone RE55's (real semis), but if I was doing track work the KU36 would be destroyed and the AO50 or RE55 would be only half as worn. It all comes down to heat really.

The treadwear ratings of S spec (like KU36) and R spec (like RE55s) are completely different (about 180 vs about 60). All things being equal the KU36s will last far longer on the street. RT-615s which i imagine are similar to KU36s, dont get chopped up like street tyres when used at the track.

Not always the case.

Comparing real semi's to 'road' semi's like KU36's is more about construction than tyre compound.

I reckon the 36's are about as soft as my advan AO50's and bridgestone RE55's (real semis)

they're not

but if I was doing track work the KU36 would be destroyed and the AO50 or RE55 would be only half as worn. It all comes down to heat really.

and they don't

KU36 outlast the much softer proper semis on the track as well as the road.

they're not

and they don't

KU36 outlast the much softer proper semis on the track as well as the road.

Ok well I was only going by the wear that I have seen on mine and others KU36's vs my AO50's on a 32 GTSt.

I did one motorkhana and the KU36's were great but wore a lot and most of that was on a concrete skid pan! My AO50's have done multiple track days and haven't gone down much at all???

We've obviously had different experiences then.

ive got ku31's in 265 on the rear. theyre a great tyre. you cant go past them for the price.

dry grip is excellent. wet grip is quite satisfactory. i mean really, how good can wet grip ever be? and if you're driving like a maniac in the wet, then you need to look at other things. such as dont be a douche.

Edited by Munkyb0y
Ok well I was only going by the wear that I have seen on mine and others KU36's vs my AO50's on a 32 GTSt.

I did one motorkhana and the KU36's were great but wore a lot and most of that was on a concrete skid pan! My AO50's have done multiple track days and haven't gone down much at all???

We've obviously had different experiences then.

so did your tyres. motorkhanas vs track days.

after the first track day (Lakeside) on my 1520kg Supra the KU36 had barely worn at all. Could still read the writing on the tread surface! It must have done a dozen track days (heaps at Lakeside, 1 each at QR, EC, & OP) & 15,000km on the road. The front were still going strong, rears were just down to the TWI.

my R888s (GG compound) which have only done 3 track days at Lakeside and 0 road km on an ~1100kg S13 are more than half worn! The lefts are just at the TWI now! And the internet would have you believe the R888 is one of the more durable semis around...

and there is certainly no doubt about the compounds being much harder on the KU36. All you have to do is look at the UTQG ratings.

  • 4 weeks later...

hi, dont know if youve purchased yet, another thing to keep in mind is the ku36 is assymetric design, you can rotate side to side

the ku31 is directional, you can rotate front to back

but, you can swap the tyre round 180 degrees if wearing one edge(ku31)

in regards to traction, it doesnt all come down to power, how hard do you corner normally?

the 2 different tyres are designed to do 2 different things.

ku36 will be great for someone who pushes their car a little harder.

if you drive more sedatley, grab the 31's, they'll last longer.

I have KU36's they are not a semi slick they are extreme performance dry tyres not intended for wet use but they can get you home if you drive ultra carefully.

I would suggest KU31's they way to go for a street car as the KU36's are horrible in the wet, they have poor feedback and they randomly let go even when maintaing constant speed around a constant radius corner.

KU36's great in the dry once they have a very small amount of heat into them but not as nice in terms of ride, noise and feel/feedback compared to all weather tyres.

They wont last as long as KU31's with the same car same driver under normal street conditions.

Personally I havent got experience with them at all to comment on wet/dry but my previous comment was based on talking to people who used them before.

Your 2nd question is a million dollar question. Depending on how you drive and if you rotate your tyres at all. I know of someone that got more than 40,000km out of a 36 but that with rotation (still not bald yet). On the other hand, another friend with 36 only got 20,000km+ because he doesnt rotate and he track his car occasionally (bald).

I usually get 3,000km out of a brand new set of rears, so sounds like the 36s should be fine :D Wish I could get 20-40k out of them, but that would be so boring lol.

I had KU31's

performed very well in the wet and dry, awesome tyre for the price i thought

the only reason I dont have them on the car now is cause i needed tyres and couldnt get KU31's for under 800 bucks for a set of rears so had to go a cheaper option, found a place to source them cheap now so next time will definently get them again

I run KU36 on the front and KU31 on the rear, even though the KU31 is the cheaper out of the two ($160 per side fitted and balanced 255/40/17) they grip better than my previous Toyo Proxes 4 which costed 1.5x the price

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...