Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

first off is this true i got told that only pushrod motors have valve bounce.

secondly that 7m gte engines are shit cuz they blow head gaskets and corrode out the head

thirdly what sort of limiter do rb25s use ( are all rbs the same) and are neos and r33 rb25 both limited at 7000 or thereabouts

and lastly will a stock rb25 turbo make 300rwhp

Thanks for your help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/
Share on other sites

first off is this true i got told that only pushrod motors have valve bounce.

secondly that 7m gte engines are shit cuz they blow head gaskets and corrode out the head

thirdly what sort of limiter do rb25s use ( are all rbs the same) and are neos and r33 rb25 both limited at 7000 or thereabouts

and lastly will a stock rb25 turbo make 300rwhp

Thanks for your help

A. No. overhead cam engines can float valves with the best of them

B. No they are not shit, Yes they do have an inherint problem with head gaskets. A set of head studs and a decent gasket and you have a motor as good as the 2j

C.Mine came speed limited, Not rev limited

D.yes

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5206894
Share on other sites

A. No. overhead cam engines can float valves with the best of them

B. No they are not shit, Yes they do have an inherint problem with head gaskets. A set of head studs and a decent gasket and you have a motor as good as the 2j

C.Mine came speed limited, Not rev limited

D.yes

220rwkw from stock turbo, no way. Suprised about the amount of people who think they can get over 200rwkw on the stocker.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5206931
Share on other sites

220rwkw from stock turbo, no way. Suprised about the amount of people who think they can get over 200rwkw on the stocker.

it can be done. it probably won't last very long but it can be done. most people will tell you that the stock turbo stops making power at about 13psi (because they read it on the internet so it must be true), but i can tell you that is wrong. i have seen it with my own eyes. stock turbo running 16psi made about 20kw more at 16psi than it did at 13psi in back to back runs. so even if you say that the dyno was reading high and ignore the total power figure it made, back to back runs with just enough time between runs to wind the boost up showed a 20kw gain where most people will say that it won't make any extra power or will lose power.

also my tuner has a rb25 in his cerfiro and he is making between 210 and 215kw @12psi on the stock turbo. the reason why i say "between" is because he has had it on his dyno and another workshops dyno (before he got his dyno) and they were both within a few kw of each other.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5207223
Share on other sites

Are you saying 20rwkw? That's a big jump from 13psi to 16psi on the stock turbo man. Your talking around 30-35HP at the engine on something that is allready pushing at its limit. Must have been a freak of an engine/turbo or something.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5207332
Share on other sites

Are you saying 20rwkw? That's a big jump from 13psi to 16psi on the stock turbo man. Your talking around 30-35HP at the engine on something that is allready pushing at its limit. Must have been a freak of an engine/turbo or something.

pretty sure it was about 20kw at the wheels. (was over a year ago now, so memory is getting a bit dodgy). but it was certainly up around there somewhere.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5207370
Share on other sites

(1) that 7m gte engines are shit cuz they blow head gaskets and corrode out the head

Thanks for your help

The 7m- GTE dose not like big boost on standard motor.

Also they do tend to leak oil a lot more then RB's do.

The main problem is that toyota did not torque down the head enough. Which is why a lot of guys go the metal gasket route and new bolts all round.

7M's are a much under rated engine....I rate them better than RBs

I would not go as far as saying the 7m-GTE is a better engine then the RB

If you have ever pulled apart an old 7m-GTE and seen the oil pump setup on these then you will see why. These engines were designed before the RB25/26.

If you are talking about 1jz-GTE or 2jz-GTE then yes you are correct.

If i had to decided to either buy a 7m-GTE or RB i'll choose the RB , mainly because parts, standard or after market are so easy to get for RB.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5207600
Share on other sites

220rwkw from stock turbo, no way. Suprised about the amount of people who think they can get over 200rwkw on the stocker.

What makes you say that?

Have you tried?

I havnt done this personally but I know a guy who has. form memory He made 302rwhp on S1 RB25DET maxing the shit out of the injectors and running 16-17psi.

I'm not saying its a good thing but yes as it has been stated multiple time, it can be done.

Edited by RBceffy25
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5207881
Share on other sites

not really. as far as the actual engine goes the 2-jz is a much better/stronger engine than the rb26, and anyone who knows about engines, no matter how much of a nissan fan they are, will say the same. most of the toyota engines are better built than their nissan counterpart.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5208784
Share on other sites

Stock does about 130rwkw, I find it hard to belive that Nissan left 90rwkw in the bag for us to unlock.

I had a HKS 2530 that did 220rwkw @ 17psi. Its a bigger turbo than the stocker.

I don't count time-bomb setups as being legitimate power figures. If it isn't bullet-proof its a waste of time.

What makes you say that?

Have you tried?

I havnt done this personally but I know a guy who has. form memory He made 302rwhp on S1 RB25DET maxing the shit out of the injectors and running 16-17psi.

I'm not saying its a good thing but yes as it has been stated multiple time, it can be done.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5208971
Share on other sites

Stock does about 130rwkw, I find it hard to belive that Nissan left 90rwkw in the bag for us to unlock.

I had a HKS 2530 that did 220rwkw @ 17psi. Its a bigger turbo than the stocker.

I don't count time-bomb setups as being legitimate power figures. If it isn't bullet-proof its a waste of time.

Regardless, he did it and we all saw it.

Of course this wasnt the actual tune he finished with. It was to see what the limits were of the stock gear and as i said everything was at there absolute limit. Yes, there are many variables but on that particular day, on that dyno blah blah blah thats what that particular enging achieved.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318644-valve-bounce/#findComment-5209649
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...