Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

Ive been reading about power bands lately, and its apparently quite important to know your cars when it comes to racing especially in the case of a naturally aspirated car.

My question is, how do you know what your power band is? Is it just drive and feel it for yourself or does each car have a power band that any common car owner can tell you?

I've also wondered about when racing, is it best to shift out of first at say 4 rpm and then build the revs in the higher gears or is it better to rev it higher in first? I feel like when I rev high in first im not really getting as much power as if I let it rev in second, and I just feeling the wrong thing?

I've never actually looked at the speedo while testing all this as im worried about keeping my eyes off the road.

Any help is greatly appreciated, one of my friends beat me in his celica the other day and all the stats show that my car should have won if my technique was better, so im trying my best to better understand everything.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/
Share on other sites

The RPM where you feel your car pulling is where the power band is. Look at horsepower and torque curves (dyno graphs) on google and you will see exactly what a power band looks like. You will want to launch your car with your engine revved such that after the clutch grabs the needle drops to around the RPM where the torque curve for your car shows it is a constant level (not where it is rising steeply) so you get a strong pull at takeoff. Does that make sense?

High revving lower displacement engines such as VTECs have the peaky power (in the top end of the RPM range) but larger displacement N/A engines can have more torque in the low end too (i.e. Nissan 350z/370z).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5219785
Share on other sites

having been on track on 2 stroke road bikes i can tell you changing gears is pretty much the same no matter what your in/on. you want to shift from first into second only when doing so will result in more acceleration, for 99% of vehicles this means changing at redline. with actual 2 stroke machines with proper powerband, changing early can result in having almost no power as they often only make any real power in the top 20% of their rev range. as to a good launch, as much as it may kill your clutch, to do a perfect launch on the bike i would simply give it full throttle at take off and slip the clutch out keeping the revs at around 12k (where the bike its max power). not 100% on doing this in a car but definitely the way to go on the bike.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5223193
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

i've read in a couple of places that the powerband can be shifted by changing cams or using cam gears, how does this work?

when it comes to changing gears, it depends when your car falls off its power band, this may be at 6500, or (more likely) much higher, like 8000rpm.

think of the power curve of the engine, you always want to be accelerating as hard as possible, so if you change at 4000rpm you're missing out on 4000-7000rpm goodness, which is where most of the power is. theoretically, the higher the rpm, the more explosions per second, the more power, but all sorts of efficiency issues get in the way. still, higher rpm = higher power. in f1 when they want to dial back the power to save the engine/fuel, they turn it's redline down.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5266924
Share on other sites

Generally - the larger the cams, the more revs are needed to get the engine to make power e.g at set of 280deg 11mm lift cams on an RB25DE would need 4500-5000rpm before it started to make power, below that the airflow through the ports is very slow and inefficiant, So you then need to rev the engine harder eg 9000rpm redline in order to have a decent power band, if the engine only revved to 7000, you would only have 2000rpm where the engine makes any grunt, so each time you changed gear you would drop out of the power and go no where.

Think of big cams like you would a big turbo...kinda

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5266947
Share on other sites

i've read in a couple of places that the powerband can be shifted by changing cams or using cam gears, how does this work?

when it comes to changing gears, it depends when your car falls off its power band, this may be at 6500, or (more likely) much higher, like 8000rpm.

think of the power curve of the engine, you always want to be accelerating as hard as possible, so if you change at 4000rpm you're missing out on 4000-7000rpm goodness, which is where most of the power is. theoretically, the higher the rpm, the more explosions per second, the more power, but all sorts of efficiency issues get in the way. still, higher rpm = higher power. in f1 when they want to dial back the power to save the engine/fuel, they turn it's redline down.

also you are missing out on 3000rpm of accelerating in a lower gear with an easier ratio. that is where the argument of "what rpm to change gears at" starts to get a bit more complicated. a simple view is to change gears the moment you get past the peak power output. what this doesn't take into account is that even though the power may be dropping off, it may still be higher than at the rpm you will be at in the next gear. and then as i said above, the more time you spend in the lower gear (within reason), the easier the car will accelerate, especially when you are talking about the higher gears. that is where each car needs to be evaluated individually to see what works best. i know that in the case of the missus SSS pulsar, with the stock headers it would start to choke around 5500rpm, and it was pretty much pointless to rev it past 6500rpm. put on a set of extractors and it doesn't start to choke until about 6500rpm but will still pull all the way to the 7500rpm redline.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318812-power-band/#findComment-5267237
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...