Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Theres been a fair bit of discussion about the O2 sensor for the C34 Stageas but I havent been able to find too much regarding the M35.

Are there options (in terms of a generic replacement, modifying the plug from another common car, or using the one from a 350z, Maxima, or something else) for us or do we have to source an OEM part from Nissan/IM (I believe the part # 22690−AL600) ?

Cheers,

Duncan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/321100-lambda-o2-sensor-for-the-m35/
Share on other sites

Hi Dunc,

Assuming you have the VQ25DET engine the part number i was quoted by Nissan was 22690-AQ800.

Just ordered one from Highway Nissan, Springwood, QLD. Cost $157.90 inc GST.

These guys at Highway Nissan are pretty helpful with imports, recommend you give them a try if you're having trouble.

Hope that helps mate.

Hey Jason,

Was that for the front O2 sensor or the back one? Main North Nissan in Adelaide quoted me prices on each one seperately, front was $211.65, rear $225.43..

Ive ordered the part number I quoted through a friend for ~$160.. I got the part number from this thread (http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=305709&view=findpost&p=5059745 )

Fingers crossed it is the right one :P

Cheers,

Duncan

There should only be one O2 senssor on the M35's.

I did query that with Nissan also but they confirmed there was only one listed for the VQ25DET.

I could be wrong but i think the 350Z has two. The original part number you quoted appears to be from the Touring Edition of the 350Z and also the M35 Stageas with the VQ30DD/XQ35DE engines.

Perhaps the part is interchangeable and if i could get my copy of FAST going i could confirm 100% for you, fingers crossed!

Can anyone else confirm this?

Cheers,

Jas

Edited - Early morning spelling issues!

Edited by HER_M35
There's a rear one? I don't think so.

Id only heard about one but I figured I was just mistaken :(

There should only be one O2 senssor on the M35's.

I did query that with Nissan also but they confirmed there was only one listed for the VQ25DET.

I could be wrong but i think the 350Z has two. The original part number you quoted appears to be from the Touring Edition of the 350Z and also the M35 Stageas with the VQ30DD/XQ35DE engines.

Perhaps the part is interchangeable and if i could get my copy of FAST going i could confirm 100% for you, fingers crossed!

Can anyone else confirm this?

Cheers,

Jas

Edited - Early morning spelling issues!

I might shoot euroequip or iamhe77 a PM to get their attention & find out if either of them have fitted that part :) If someone could FAST it that'd be tops also :D

There should only be one O2 senssor on the M35's.

I did query that with Nissan also but they confirmed there was only one listed for the VQ25DET.

I could be wrong but i think the 350Z has two. The original part number you quoted appears to be from the Touring Edition of the 350Z and also the M35 Stageas with the VQ30DD/XQ35DE engines.

Perhaps the part is interchangeable and if i could get my copy of FAST going i could confirm 100% for you, fingers crossed!

Can anyone else confirm this?

Cheers,

Jas

Edited - Early morning spelling issues!

arghhhh it's my TWIN!

+1.... maybe they were confused by the grounding point on the exhaust? :(

Hope you got it all sorted Dunc (sometimes Nissan dealerships need to be TOLD about the car)

Found the one and only O2 sensor, it hides pretty good :P Initial attempts to remove it by disconnecting the dump pipe failed miserably due to not being able to get the dump pipe off the turbo from below - not enough wiggle room for tools - or the tools on hand. Didnt have an O2 sensor socket. That was last night. Round 2, tonight, saw the use of an O2 sensor socket and the operation went quite smoothly :P

I used the part I mentioned earlier, went in fine, plug was all good & its not throwing any error codes. Chalking that one up as a win.

  • 1 year later...

*Should* throw a check engine light if it does fail.

That would be if it the ECU doesn't read Volts from the sensor all together. They can, I been told, become slower at reading, leading to some strange driving.

Lucky buggers you bunch are. You have one- I got 4.

I wouldn't bother changing if it isn't broke. A couple of hundred bucks of fuel is a lot for a O2 sensor to make up in efficiency!

There was some discussion on those in the Forced Induction thread a while ago.

I've got one of these to go in: http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/products/MTXL.php

I think Scotty is using the older versions.

Aaron had the AEM one in his and it seemed good, but I didn't like that it couldn't be calibrated. That, and the Innovate one was reasonably priced.

Leon's running a different one again...

See if you can find the thread in the Forced Induction section, covering heaps of different widebands.

It seems there used to be quite a few innovative failures but now they seem better. Now the AEM ones seem to be failing.

Try the PLX, as long as it has a narrowband output you can plug it into the stock o2 position, although most instructions say to have the sensor 20 inches away. You have to make sure they point down which makes it hard to install so far down the exhaust.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...