Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

according to the nistune site the speedlab got 373kw out of a rb20 running a nistune.

They certainly did make that power, and that was on a Standard RB20 with something like a T04Z on it.

Here's a thread with the results in it.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Tu...-M-t214053.html

As Paul said Nistune is basically an interface between the Factory ECU (which uses Hex Code) and your laptop. It allows people to tune the factory ECU with out them needing to know Hex code or the address files.

  • 2 months later...

After using the Japanese ROM hex editing packages and having some information about the decoding, not to mention the information that came about at the time from PLMS about the consult interface it was just a matter of putting a good interface on there and then using NVRAM boards instead of emulators made things a lot easier. At the time we had no idea it would be taken up so well!

Edited by darkhalf

I had the nistune in my vl.

Some one said that the only way to max out nistune is when your injectors are maxed out...

Thats when you upgrade your injectors etc and then tell the ecu via the tuning and you are back at the start of tuning again. THERE IS NO WAY POSSIBLE TO MAX OUT THE NISTUNE

^^LOL. Damn Nistune not fixing your windows!

Just got my Nistune done this week. Power delivery is so smooth now. Car made a lot more power on a lot less boost than my old piggyback i had with the same mods.

I highly recommend this for anyone with basic bolt on mods or all out car with all the fruit.

And thanks to the Chasers crew!

^^LOL. Damn Nistune not fixing your windows!

Just got my Nistune done this week. Power delivery is so smooth now. Car made a lot more power on a lot less boost than my old piggyback i had with the same mods.

I highly recommend this for anyone with basic bolt on mods or all out car with all the fruit.

And thanks to the Chasers crew!

Agreed the value for money for nistune blows everything out of the water since the computer is cheap to begin with and then tuners don't have to do cold start maps which are a PITA.

Unless you were going for any absolute beast with some stupid power figure nistune would be the go. Any car being used as a daily should not anything other than a nistune

  • 2 weeks later...

:D

Agreed the value for money for nistune blows everything out of the water since the computer is cheap to begin with and then tuners don't have to do cold start maps which are a PITA.

Unless you were going for any absolute beast with some stupid power figure nistune would be the go. Any car being used as a daily should not anything other than a nistune

With a stock standard non turbo skyline 2500 cc, used as a daily with no intention to modify what measurable performance differences are we talking about? I have no concept whatsoever

  1. eg 3% or 5% or 20% improvement in acceleration times?
    2. More torque at lower speeds?
    3. Better fuel economy eg 1 % or 5% or 10%?

I am a bit lost on this topic and a complete novice, even after reading through this thread . the Nistune site wasnt helpful..

Am I buying some Nistune hardware for a few hundred dollars to be installed in my car to allow a Nistune operator to achieve this better tune ?

If so does this allow future tunes to be done with minimal labor and save the dollars?

What is the difference between a high performance tune and a normal tune by a mechanic that is good at his or her craft?

if the former then wont that mean daily driving around town will result in poor fuel economy but excellent highway economy?

i know where ever you go its the same but i hate it when all someone does is sell their product with no regard for your budget or anything, i guess its business but its still annoying, i am lost when it comes to this and this topic has already helped me heaps, very happy to read that nistune is capable or supporting quite big power

Mechanic's don't actually "tune" cars, people (australians) run their cars into the ground by the time it gets to the mechanic for its regular maintenance, changing spark plugs, air filter, fuel filter, oil, oil filter etc and the car feels like new again. That's where the perceived "tune" come from. A "high performance tune" is where the car is on a dynometer (rolling road) and generally someone who specializes in that sort of car tweaks the ECU (Nistune etc) to make the engine more efficient at making power, but you don't need to worry about that having a non-turbo because the stock ECU does an ok job at stock power.. any money spent on it's performance is just a waste, best just to sell it and buy a turbo skyline.

Mechanic's don't actually "tune" cars, people (australians) run their cars into the ground by the time it gets to the mechanic for its regular maintenance, changing spark plugs, air filter, fuel filter, oil, oil filter etc and the car feels like new again. That's where the perceived "tune" come from. A "high performance tune" is where the car is on a dynometer (rolling road) and generally someone who specializes in that sort of car tweaks the ECU (Nistune etc) to make the engine more efficient at making power, but you don't need to worry about that having a non-turbo because the stock ECU does an ok job at stock power.. any money spent on it's performance is just a waste, best just to sell it and buy a turbo skyline.

I also have a nissan turbo.

So just to confirm your opinion.For a non turbo its a waste but for a standard GTS -T ( no modifications )it a performance tune by Nistune would be a lot better( than say gong to ultratune).

What does more efficient mean in terms of actual on the ground figures?Still have no concept.

Your car has a computer that has some software loaded on it by nissan before it leaves the factory.

This software decides how much fuel to inject, and when to fire the spark plugs based on how much air it sees going in to the engine.

If you start to increase the amount of air going in to the engine (i.e. by modifying it), the nissan software will not handle this efficiently. It will think there is a problem with the engine, and go into a safe mode - slowing the engine down.

You can install Nistune hardware into your computer, and that allows a tuner to easily change the software on it that tells it how much fuel to inject, and when to fire the sparkplugs - so the engine runs optimally based the greater amount of air now entering the engine.

I also have a nissan turbo.

So just to confirm your opinion.For a non turbo its a waste but for a standard GTS -T ( no modifications )it a performance tune by Nistune would be a lot better( than say gong to ultratune).

What does more efficient mean in terms of actual on the ground figures?Still have no concept.

Nistune is NOT a workshop/tuner, it is the company that makes the hardware that is installed inside the factory ECUs that allows it to be reprogrammed in real time.

In the past the only option with the factory ECUs was to have the EEPROM chip removed, reprogrammed and then resoldered back into the ECU. This is an expensive exercise at about $500 a pop. Whereas Nistune is a once-off $220ish for the hardware itself, then maybe another $60-$80 for it to be soldered into the ECU (or for free if you have a friend with good soldering skill), then a full dyno tune can be anywhere from $500-$900 depending on mods, and anytime you do any performance mod in the future it will probably cost less than $100 as the tuning is done through the CONSULT port, no need to open the ECU at all (where you would be paying $500 to have the EEPROM chip taken out, reprogrammed and soldered back in).

Nistune is great value because you retain the factory diagnostics, and for comparison an aftermarket ecu, the Apexi PFC alone is at least $1200 imported from Japan

Nistune is NOT a workshop/tuner, it is the company that makes the hardware that is installed inside the factory ECUs that allows it to be reprogrammed in real time.

In the past the only option with the factory ECUs was to have the EEPROM chip removed, reprogrammed and then resoldered back into the ECU. This is an expensive exercise at about $500 a pop. Whereas Nistune is a once-off $220ish for the hardware itself, then maybe another $60-$80 for it to be soldered into the ECU (or for free if you have a friend with good soldering skill), then a full dyno tune can be anywhere from $500-$900 depending on mods, and anytime you do any performance mod in the future it will probably cost less than $100 as the tuning is done through the CONSULT port, no need to open the ECU at all (where you would be paying $500 to have the EEPROM chip taken out, reprogrammed and soldered back in).

Nistune is great value because you retain the factory diagnostics, and for comparison an aftermarket ecu, the Apexi PFC alone is at least $1200 imported from Japan

Great CONCISE ANSWER MOODLES2. Everything is very clear.

For normal city and Highway driving it sounds like for an unmodified car the modification of the ECU by attaching a Nistune piece of hardware would be of little or no benefit. if this is a wrong assumption then what statistical benefit are we talking about?

Can somone Show me the numbers for a base skyline 2500cc non turbo skyline

Im interested to know who is making the most power in a gtr using the nistune ? & what afm's are being used.

There are obvious advantages using the nistune & would like to compare with the likes of a haltech plug in pro..im looking to make 380 + rwkw and was

ready to go for the haltech, but out of curiosity would like to know if others here are using it on decent powered gtr's.

What car are you planning to Nistune? You say you have a Nissan turbo, but your garage says you have a GTS (N/A), but then you ask about a GTS-T, you aren't making any sense.

If we are talking about a GTS-T (turbo), the Nissan basemap (the factory tune) are always quite rich and on the safe side, by cleaning up the basemap up you can get slightly better fuel economy and at the same time make alittle more power (maybe 5-20kw?, something best to be put to your prefered performance workshop/tuner), but first it's best to do supporting mods (boost controller at a safe level say 10psi for the stock turbo, better smic or fmic, less restricting exhaust from the turbo back with a hiflow cat, highflow air filter etc)

" and anytime you do any performance mod in the future it will probably cost less than $100 "

Dont think so...

I would imagine it wouldn't take any longer than a hour on the dyno if it's had a full tune in the past?

What car are you planning to Nistune? You say you have a Nissan turbo, but your garage says you have a GTS (N/A), but then you ask about a GTS-T, you aren't making any sense.

If we are talking about a GTS-T (turbo), the Nissan basemap (the factory tune) are always quite rich and on the safe side, by cleaning up the basemap up you can get slightly better fuel economy and at the same time make alittle more power (maybe 5-20kw?, something best to be put to your prefered performance workshop/tuner), but first it's best to do supporting mods (boost controller at a safe level say 10psi for the stock turbo, better smic or fmic, less restricting exhaust from the turbo back with a hiflow cat, highflow air filter etc)

Sory of my post was unclear Moodles

I used a GTS-T as I thought it would get the most responses . I have a stagea M35,and not many of those around

My Stagea M35b is a turbo (206k)

My GTS Skyline is a non turbo

I am seeking information to ascertain if its a good investment to use a NISTUNE or a waste of money on non modified cars .

I would see 10 kw as a significant jump

thanks for th equick replies . I have learnt a lot for your 2 posts

Edited by samuri

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...