Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/190611_1943516947317_1224295443_4398956_8279466_n.jpg

This is my Gf stagea as it sits at the moment

There weds kranze cerberus ii in 19s

Width I'm unsure as the same as ofset ,

Tires are 19/235 35 on the front

And 19/265 35 on rear , tires are also look fairly stretched,

Looking the goods there!

I'd be willing to bet those staggered tyre sizes are the root of you driveline shudder.

They're a no go on these cars...

Size is up to you, but they have to be the same sizes front and rear.

Even theoretically perfectly matched rolling dia staggered sets seem to cause issues with the ATESSA system.

If you can; fit a set of matching dia wheels/tyres, and see what happens.

Size is up to you, but they have to be the same sizes front and rear.

Even theoretically perfectly matched rolling dia staggered sets seem to cause issues with the ATESSA system.

If you can; fit a set of matching dia wheels/tyres, and see what happens.

I always found this a little strange, by this reasoning adjusting the camber on a car, even if its not by choice (lowering) would change the amount of tyre contacting the road and thus change the width and more than likely the rolling diameter ever so slightly...

I have also seen plenty of GTR's running staggered widths in the past, is there something about our cars that makes this an impossibility?

Mike.

I always found this a little strange, by this reasoning adjusting the camber on a car, even if its not by choice (lowering) would change the amount of tyre contacting the road and thus change the width and more than likely the rolling diameter ever so slightly...

I have also seen plenty of GTR's running staggered widths in the past, is there something about our cars that makes this an impossibility?

Mike.

I have to say I agree. GTR's seem to get away with it fine, I've even seen Evos with 9.5" wide rims front, and 9" rear, albeit with the same size tyres (apparently gives better grip through corners), but when I had slightly different tyres on my C34 Stagea, it "bucked" from the get go. I won't be trying it on my M35..

Hey Wagon boy, looking nice! Did you get the wing fitted after or was it already there?

He already had it; but he's just minding for me until Sunday...:ph34r:

Bloody Nismo; why can't they just make something that I DON'T want?:spank:

Most wings are "not suitable for ARX" is this correct?

No.

All Nismo add-ons state "not suitable for ARX" for some reason, even though you can fit the speedo, suspension, exhaust, wing etc just the same as with an RS or RX.

Where there is a bit of a problem is with front and rear bumpers and side skirts due to the ARX and Axis flares.

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...