Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

From my experience ethanol burns hotter and faster when under high boost pressures, a colder plug will be fine. I doubt I will be changing plugs just to get the engine to start better.

I though ethanol burnt colder?

I thought a hotter heat range spark plug was desired with E85?

There's a lot of mis-information around. I was told 10 to 15 degrees advanced where it actually wants less timing on the dyno. It wont eat out you fuel lines either.

It has very strange burn qualities, burning slow and cold usually but apparently hotter and faster than petrol once under boost pressure (so it would depend how many psi you run). Everybody will tell you a different story but that is the fun of testing it.

E85 is a tricky one... Cold start is a bitch, but it's not the sole purpose of this thread.

In the orig sparkplug thread there is 11ty pages and 11ty combinations, some that work and some that don't. That is what I hope to acheive here :)

CAR: S14 200SX (SR20DET with 9:1 comp)

POWER: 270rwkw

BOOST: 24psi

TYPE OF ETHANOL: E50 (50% just fuel E100/50% BP 98)

PLUG: BKR6EIX

GAP: 0.8mm

COLD START: Great in summer. Not too bad in winter. Was shit with 7's.

HOT: Perfect

I did heaps of research about spark plugs and when the ignition system is near it's limits like mine is, the smaller tip of Iridium plugs allow a spark with less required voltage. It doesn't have as much potential for a big hot spark like copper though so copper is still best if the ignition system can actually spark.

Used to run 7's but would cold start shit and missfire like all hell when u plant it after a bit of cruising. 6's are perfect.

  • 6 months later...

CAR: R32 Gts-t with RB25DET

POWER: 385rwkw

TYPE OF ETHANOL: E42.5

PLUG: BCPR7ES

GAP: 0.6

COLD START: Fine

HOT: Fine

Started missing at 0.8 gapped plugs, which was fixed by gapping to 0.6

Might try and run some 6's at 0.8 next time it's on the dyno to see how that goes!

Edited by SimonR32

i would have thought to achieve better cold start you'd want to lean it off a fair bit.

how many tuners spend enough time on the cold start map anyway... the answer is not enough.

The reason it needs to be richer is when everything is cold when the fuel sprays out the inj it isnt atomised properly and sticks to the cold ports and valves etc so not much actually reaches the cylinder (too lean for combustion). Therefor a richer mix is needed so the correct amount needed is ready to burn. Once it starts and warms a little the mixtures can be leaned off back to target AFR

Waaay to much work and money. I researched it for a while trying to find the best way to do it cost efficiently using the dump pipe. Especially on a GTR with crappy access to the runners.

Whats the main reason YOU would want egt of each runner?

if the inj are flowing the same and the rail has sudficient/even flow and pressure would u still use it?

I run E85, RB26 with standard pistons and compression. 292 @ 10.2 cams.

Absolutely no dramas with cold starts. It may be that its hotter up here than down south but at 5 - 10deg in the morning its perfect.

CAR: 32GTR

POWER:607 rwhp with 100 shot NOS

TYPE OF ETHANOL: E85 Caltex

PLUG:Bcpr6es

GAP:0.8

COLD START:Good

HOT: Good too

Edited by HYPED6

I was thinking about individual egt but before the turbine seemed like such a silly idea incase one breaks off. I decided on one ex temp sensor right at the turbine outlet and a wideband.

Im currently running 1.1 gap on Denso Iridium IKH22's, the cold plugs I originally ran with bp98. I only have a small issue with spark before the engine oil has reached operating temp. (probably running too rich) No starting issues at all since the change to Eflex.

If you don't run individual EGT's in each runner then don't bother using E85 coz you're wasting your time. You'll have no idea what temps you are at and therefore the tune could be miles off. Not so important with pump fuel as you can tune easily to AFR but with E85, every setup is potentially different which means one of you could be 1000deg egt and the next person with the same engine and turbo could be 600deg egts. 0.8 lambda doesn't run true in every case with E85, or at least that's what we found while having our cars tuned with it

Haha, I had better convert back then...

How is the exhaust temp going to change so radically within 3 inches? Keeping to a realistic temp at the turbo outlet should give an accurate idea of what is happening. I realise there is variation between the cylinders but how many tuners are that anal to fit individual egt for each port on a road car? Race or drag I could understand.

In my case, e85 is the best mod I have done, and all it cost me was filling at a different servo.

Haha, I had better convert back then...

How is the exhaust temp going to change so radically within 3 inches? Keeping to a realistic temp at the turbo outlet should give an accurate idea of what is happening. I realise there is variation between the cylinders but how many tuners are that anal to fit individual egt for each port on a road car? Race or drag I could understand.

In my case, e85 is the best mod I have done, and all it cost me was filling at a different servo.

When people start blowing engines up all over the place, then maybe others will sit up and take notice. Just like all the v8 supercar teams did

If you don't run individual EGT's in each runner then don't bother using E85 coz you're wasting your time.

When people start blowing engines up all over the place, then maybe others will sit up and take notice. Just like all the v8 supercar teams did

crack_pipe.jpg

Edited by SimonR32

When people start blowing engines up all over the place, then maybe others will sit up and take notice. Just like all the v8 supercar teams did

:stupid: lol.

The V8 supercar teams were trying to be smart and run very lean to lighten their massive fuel load, added to the fact they were wringing their engines around a racetrack at full noise. The laws of physics cant be bent unfortunately.

I have noticed a decent lowering my of exhaust temps on the dyno and the road, even with 3psi more boost on a maxed turbo. I would suggest running an exhaust temp gauge mounted at the turbine outlet just to make sure the temps aren't sky-rocketing.

I've been running ethanol for almost a year with no engines exploding and my fuel lines are still intact. Am I just lucky or do I have a great tuner?

To get the most out of E85, EGT's are a very help full tool. Well any fuel for that matter.

ERD is right, some engines (highly strung boosted ones) will be quite happy at 0.90-0.95 Lambda. Good Temps, and making more power than richer mixtures.

Where some need more than .078 Lambda for temps and some times have no adverse effect on power out put at all.

Its a case by case really. E85 is very forgiving. You can over advance it, run it lean and its still pretty safe on pistons.

Over advancing however puts massive loads on big end bearings and gudgeon pins. But this will come back to your engine builder with "but it didn't ping, the pistons are perfect!"

Sorry off topic has one one asked the V8 guys what ignition timing they run????? I believe there biggest complaint is the massive amount of heat exhaust E85 generates.

I am also under the understanding that they have a limit on total ignition timing that can be run at full load.

I believe this was started in the 98 octane era to create a parity with the teams.

Back on topic ........ I will run a set of 9's or 10's in my gtr and see if there are differences that I can find with starting cold.

  • Like 1

Back on topic ........ I will run a set of 9's or 10's in my gtr and see if there are differences that I can find with starting cold.

Cold starts in Queensland in summer shouldn't give you too many headaches. :)

I only have a problem at under 10 degrees, below 5 it wont start at all without a squirt of petrol. (The electronic throttle wont let me give it some on startup to dump fuel in.)

crack_pipe.jpg

I don't find your pictures funny

:stupid: lol.

The V8 supercar teams were trying to be smart and run very lean to lighten their massive fuel load, added to the fact they were wringing their engines around a racetrack at full noise. The laws of physics cant be bent unfortunately.

I have noticed a decent lowering my of exhaust temps on the dyno and the road, even with 3psi more boost on a maxed turbo. I would suggest running an exhaust temp gauge mounted at the turbine outlet just to make sure the temps aren't sky-rocketing.

I've been running ethanol for almost a year with no engines exploding and my fuel lines are still intact. Am I just lucky or do I have a great tuner?

And I don't think your emoticon is witty

Sure, you may be fine. But you all prance around like you know every scenario for every engine ever built. People will read this shit and think they have knowledge enough to do it themselves. Armed with the peace of mind that SAU forum goers have given them. Well I can tell you it's not that simple. Make jokes all you like and have your fun now. Yes your tuner is probably doing ok. If you don't have any idea of temps in your exhaust, at a minimum at the exit of the turbine, then you could probably make another 50-100hp at the wheels and not risk anything. Or.....you could already be running over 1000 degrees and not even know it.

Knowing temps at the runner will not save your turbo, however. As we have found, a restrictive turbine housing creates so much of a heat build up, that 750 in the runner can mean over 1000 at the turbine. Then 1 inch back in the dump it will still drop at least 100degrees out.

Tuning Noels car to 0.8 lambda with 7's in, cold start was f**ked, missfired its arse off, tuned to 0.95 lambda and egt's went from 600 to 750 at the cylinder head.

The point I was making about it being a waste of time without EGT's is you are moving to E85 to make more power/torque, you aren't going to be tuning it to it's potential without knowing temp and, therefore, wasting your time

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...