Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Will be building up my RB25 R33 for approx. 500rwhp around April 2011, and need to know a few things before I start..

Background - the motor currently has stage 1 HKS cams and exhaust cam gear (adjustable), however I am unsure of the timing as the motor was bought secondhand.. i assume around 262-264 possibly? also has ACL forged standard bore pistons, and race bearings all round. running on standard conrods at the moment.

New parts - Will be upgrading with the following: Garrett GT3582R .67 rear (700hp capable), 750CC injectors, Sard fuel rail, Malpassi rising rate FPR, walbro intank pump, high mount manifold, plazmaman front facing plenum, and Link G4 plug-in ECU.

I'm shooting for 500hp, so using the rate of approximately 20% loss through a manual drivetrain that puts engine/flywheel power at 600hp...

I want to know if anyone here has ever run an RB25 on this sort of power, I assume it'll need to be running between 22-30 psi of boost, but this will only be for a dyno run to prove capability, the engine will be down-tuned to around 300rwkw or approx. 400rwhp for daily use.

Also if anyone knows, what is the approximate breaking/failure point of standard Nissan conrods in an RB25? I know I'll probably need to upgrade them in the near future anyway, but I understand that dyno-runs at 500hp and daily driving at 400hp exert different stresses on the motor (dyno offers a lot less friction so bigger numbers are easier to obtain without overly much damage to the motor).

TL:DR; will 500hp dynoed and 400hp daily tune kill my standard RB25 rods? pistons are forged.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328015-rb25-bottom-end-query/
Share on other sites

Garrett GT3582R .67 rear (700hp capable) - i wasnt aware garrett made any other than .63 .82 1.06 genuine T3 housings of which the .63 will be hard pressed to make more than 350kw @ the rears, if you want the power go the .82 or 1.06

walbro intank pump - i would be looking at a bosch 044 instead they are proven time and again that they can pull the numbers

I'm shooting for 500hp, so using the rate of approximately 20% loss through a manual drivetrain that puts engine/flywheel power at 600hp... - at the best of times guessing these figures is akin to picking the lotto numbers, if you want to know what it has at the fly get it on an engine dyno.

I want to know if anyone here has ever run an RB25 on this sort of power, I assume it'll need to be running between 22-30 psi of boost, but this will only be for a dyno run to prove capability, the engine will be down-tuned to around 300rwkw or approx. 400rwhp for daily use. - nytsky has 400kw with a built 25, you build the engine to take this power, with the lag of a turbo that will make the power, why wind down the boost like a girly man :wub:

Also if anyone knows, what is the approximate breaking/failure point of standard Nissan conrods in an RB25? I know I'll probably need to upgrade them in the near future anyway, but I understand that dyno-runs at 500hp and daily driving at 400hp exert different stresses on the motor (dyno offers a lot less friction so bigger numbers are easier to obtain without overly much damage to the motor). - Rod bolts are the weakest link more so than the rods, if you can just open it up and get some spool rods fitted $600 + fitting, a small price to pay for security seeing as the rest of it is already done.

TL:DR; will 500hp dynoed and 400hp daily tune kill my standard RB25 rods? pistons are forged. - TL:DR maybe, it may last for years or it may not, you may win lotto tomorrow or you may not end of the day its luck and tuning

I think you'll find a legitimate 500rwhp a bit hard with a .67 rear... you sure that is correct?

The only other thing is the factory rods - Totally depends on what rod bolts were used.

If for some reason factory items were installed - you would want to think twice about it all TBH and settle for a bit less power/smaller turbo to be in the safe side

Otherwise mirror what Titan has said, especially the fuel pump part.

thanks for all the help guys, sorry I did actualy get the A/R wrong on the rear I had a different turbo in mind (or had a fk up, either or it's my bad!)

I was talking to a mate, and for the sake of an extra $1500-$2000 it may well be worth looking into getting some decent forged I-beams and fitting them up, a friend in town is a qualified mechanic who's doing weekend cashies, has built an RB25 and a 25/30 from the ground up with pretty high power so I figure i'll talk to him to get some forged rods and ARP rod bolts, all the bearings are ACL bearings, the motor is pretty well nearly built for that sort of power as it is, the only weak link would be the rods and possibly it would be worth looking into flowing the head a bit better, i mean im spending close to $10k as it is on just parts and tuning so why not spend a few hundred extra for some head goodies while the head is off?

i figure with an AVC-R and a decent cam duration it wouldn't have too much trouble building boost, especially when i get bored and turn on antilag =P

NB: current parts list, edit and add others if you see the need or if i've missed something =D

Garrett GT3582 - 0.82 rear

Wastegate - Tial Sport 38mm

Turbo Manifold (high mount)

Plazmaman intake manifold kit (piping/plenum/silicone/bigger tb)

Fuel System Upgrade - Bosch 044/750CC injectors/Sard rail/Malpassi FPR)

APEXI AVC-R boost controller

Link G4 Plug-In ECU

Spool Conrods

ARP Rod Bolts

I figure if I go with forged conrods it probably means I can crank maximum recommended boost out of that turbo and aim for over 500rwhp, as I said it'll be getting down-tuned for street duties (cops are arseholes in Toowoomba/i'm a poor uni student and need something reliable-ish)

All help is immensely appreciated

NB: current parts list, edit and add others if you see the need or if i've missed something =D

Garrett GT3582 - 0.82 rear

Wastegate - Tial Sport 38mm

Turbo Manifold (high mount)

Plazmaman intake manifold kit (piping/plenum/silicone/bigger tb)

Fuel System Upgrade - Bosch 044/750CC injectors/Sard rail/Malpassi FPR)

APEXI AVC-R boost controller

Link G4 Plug-In ECU

Spool Conrods

ARP Rod Bolts

I figure if I go with forged conrods it probably means I can crank maximum recommended boost out of that turbo and aim for over 500rwhp, as I said it'll be getting down-tuned for street duties (cops are arseholes in Toowoomba/i'm a poor uni student and need something reliable-ish)

All help is immensely appreciated

Intank Bosch is 040. Shouldn't need fpr or new fuel rail (unless you're getting some odd-ball injectors).

i figure with an AVC-R and a decent cam duration it wouldn't have too much trouble building boost, especially when i get bored and turn on antilag =P

you could sell off the AVC-R and use the built in boost control with the ECU, with a wired in switch you can have dual boost settings, but with a motor built like that the power isnt going to hurt it.

Just leave the boost up and dont put your foot down as far you get the same result.

make sure you have a 044 pump and your turbo has the 1.06 rear housing for that horse power. as well as the rods issue and no more then 7500rpm it will live a long time

I was always led to believe that the .84/86 was the one to go for for 500-550hp? I thought 1.06 was only if you wanted 600+? and had the luxury of more displacement.

P.s what would the lag of a 1.06 be like on a 2.5ltr considering the .84/86 wont be on full song till the early (if your lucky) to late 4000rpms?

The GT35 is a 700hp rated item in the .82 IIRC

I know my GT3040 was 600hp in a .82 with the largest GT comp wheel on offer (and was well and truly on song by 4k rpm)

Given it was what, 17psi for 270rwkw with a crap exhaust, so give it 20-22psi 300-320 is what you'd expect from the 600hp variant without much of a worry (in theory)

I cannot see why a GT35 with a 82 couldn't see 350-360rwkw with 22psi or so given it's a proper external setup and if the motor is build right.

With a Garret-IW you might have problems however but that's not something to deal with in this scenario

Intank Bosch is 040. Shouldn't need fpr or new fuel rail (unless you're getting some odd-ball injectors).

it's going from side feed standard injectors to top feed 750cc's so i thought i'd need a rail?

would a TR44 wheel from that mob in brissy be even worth looking at out of curiosity? and i'd rather the 0.86, ill talk to a friend down here who made 472rwhp with the gt3582 and see what housing he had..

i don't want an overly large lag, like i understand im gonna have to expect some going from a highflowed standard turbo being on full by around 2000rpm lol... i'd honestly be happy with 480rwhp (360rwkw), it's still a pretty decent power figure, in the end of the day like i said, will be tuned for daily driving, the dyno sheet will basically just be a wank sheet when i do sell it (trust me, I will eventually!)

QUOTE (KiwiRS4T @ 9 Jul 2010, 03:53 AM) *

Intank Bosch is 040. Shouldn't need fpr or new fuel rail (unless you're getting some odd-ball injectors).

it's going from side feed standard injectors to top feed 750cc's so i thought i'd need a rail?

would a TR44 wheel from that mob in brissy be even worth looking at out of curiosity? and i'd rather the 0.86, ill talk to a friend down here who made 472rwhp with the gt3582 and see what housing he had..

i don't want an overly large lag, like i understand im gonna have to expect some going from a highflowed standard turbo being on full by around 2000rpm lol... i'd honestly be happy with 480rwhp (360rwkw), it's still a pretty decent power figure, in the end of the day like i said, will be tuned for daily driving, the dyno sheet will basically just be a wank sheet when i do sell it (trust me, I will eventually!)

another thing i'm curious about is cam timing, i know i have got some form of cam replacing the standard but i have no clue what size, like i said the engine has been replaced and it came as is, the mechanic who built it doesn't know the timing as the cams were done with tuning, im guessing 256deg... i was thinking of up-rating the entire valvetrain anyway, tomei all through so valve spring seat shims, solid lifters and a big lift/big duration cam (270deg).. would 270 degrees be too long on the exhaust timing as well as intake timing?

Edited by fattox33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...