Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow, I wasnt aware of that, My appologies... The thought never really crossed my mind, Things are way more relaxed here in New Zealand, I dont even run a cat in mine. The police here in Hastings are more interested in people who are drink driving or actually making the roads more dangerous for people to drive on.

i wish all cops were like that.

This thread should be removed so if any cops do read it they wont know how to check

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i had a cat on my car. after 12 months there was nothing inside and i did not puch it out or gut it.

what happens if it guts itself? and you recieve a 10k fine? pretty slack imo

I totally agree with you guilt-toy but we all know what the law is like...

Basically the same as your p-plate falling off the back window then you being fined for not displaying (happened to me even tho front plate was up) or being fined for having a brake/tail-light out. We are somehow meant to know every single detail like that...

Rubbish.

If you simply tap it with a torch or similar you can EASILY tell that it is hollow.

Most coppers wouldn't have a clue and most coppers aren't going to lay down on the road and crawl under your car with their torch.

Most people will get away with a gutted cat forever. Only a few people will give the po-po enough motivation to actually go to all the effort of sussing out whether your cat is gutted.

I suspect that a gutted cat would be the last of the OPs troubles if he does find himself attracting the attention of the police regularly, as it is with most people on here. My car is a prime example. Big front mount, pod filter, exhaust, gutted cat, lowered, upped boost. It's very, very "unroadworthy" according to the rules but I don't attract attention and have yet to have a copper even give me a sideways glance. If I do eventually give the cops a reason to have a look over my car they are going to find a myriad of things to pick on me for.

Well think about running into the Fav officer out in Knox.

He can't find anything on your car that stands out (there are plenty out there who modify with smarts), and gives it a simple tap. Oh dear you say...

I can easily see that happening given I've had people @ the EPA take my ECU cover off.

I put nothing past anyone these days, as that kinda assumption is what gets you dicked.

Just as they'd have to prove their good judgement and/or qualifications when defecting you for engine/vehicle modifications?

They don't need to prove anything, they just need to form a hunch that something's wrong, and off you go to a place where people WILL know.

exactly... they cant just whack out a 10k fine like all the scaremongers are saying... they just send you to the EPA, and if you are stupid enough to turn up there with a decat/gutted then you deserve it anyway

Easy just make it so low they cant get under the car to tap the cat to see if it sounds hollow :blink:

+1 for being able to smell it to, and if your car's white, be prepared for a fuel stain that wont come off.

you can definately smell it, but as for the stain, just take a can of degreaser to the carwash and it comes off without a hitch

It's actually a 10k fine.

& Hamish, they then send you to EPA who verify you have no cat or internals...

& basicallty it doesn't matter if their thermometer reads 50 degrees out, they are only looking for a difference before & after cat.

& different materials may make a slight difference but not much, & anyway almost all of us run a s/s exhaUst & cat which they can tell by looking

and has anyone here ever seen this 10k fine first hand? dont get me wrong... i certainly wouldn't put it past our antihoon revenue raising government... but i have never heard of it actually being more than an urban legend... i'm sure the fine is big... but not 10k big

also what's with all this tapping business? they can send you to the EPA on simple suspicion, so why would they bother getting on the ground?

not to mention if you run a cat shell welded around a 3" pipe then it doesn't sound hollow anyway :blink:

lol ahh the old (i dont want a cat, but i dont want to get in trouble) threads

the post to end all posts

yes decats are illegal

no its not likely someone will catch it (i had none for about a year with stains on the ass and everything, never had any trouble)

yes if you do get caught its 10k fine (willing to risk it?)

if you want to run no cat, dont drive like an idiot and u wont get pulled over

and last but not least, if u live in knox (victoria) DONT even THINK about taking the cat out

Well if you end up getting caught @ a EPA random test/street station kinda thing :blink:

fair call... but they would still have to pull the exhaust out to be certain

i had a cat on my car. after 12 months there was nothing inside and i did not puch it out or gut it.

what happens if it guts itself? and you recieve a 10k fine? pretty slack imo

had a R32 use shoot HUGE flames , and i know i didnt gut it so i guess it came gutted?

the flames popping out the back is a big giveaway too - a cop will throw the book at you if they see flames shooting out the back of your car.

Just get a high flow cat!

dose it still shoot flames with a high flow? :rofl2:

yer everyone alwasy gose on about this 10k fine... but ive never seen or heard of anyone geting hit with it. in saying that my cars got a high flow.... not worth the risk

Unless you have over 300kw most highflow cats wont make much differents to power maybe 1 - 2 kw if there half decent?

So just go highflow or if you want to run decat pipe/ gutted cat. But other than flames and nose its not going to make THAT much of a diff.

Edited by raZ1911
Some police use a infra-red thermometer to measure temp before & after the cat. Can't thionk which way it is right now (just woke up) but I think with a cat in place it is hotter. Have had it done to me but luckily I run a cat. MASSIVE fines if you're caught without one...

If your car has the original cat and over 150k old I doubt it would be working anyway so half the cars on the road would fail that test.

It's actually a 10k fine.

I've never heard of a single person EVER being fined $10k in over 7 years of reading forums like these. Surely if you did actually get stung with a fine that big you would be kicking up a huge fuss.

the flames popping out the back is a big giveaway too - a cop will throw the book at you if they see flames shooting out the back of your car

Mine has a relatively new high flow cat and still blows massive flames now and then, it has a fairly rich tune as it was just to get me through an inspection so quite a bit of fuel on the overrun, has anyone experienced this? Would be surprised if someone had piped it, certainly doesn't look like it.

Edited by Rolls
fair call... but they would still have to pull the exhaust out to be certain

Perhaps.

Remember it operates on suspicion rather than fact in these parts :rofl2:

Plus if their sensors are geting triggered off (as they do), and you claim the cat is fine, tap tap tap... oh dear :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...