Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I beleive there is still a problem as I haven't received an email notification in ages and it's a pain in the arse. I only receive an email if someone actually quotes me.

Cheers

Neil.

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I beleive there is still a problem as I haven't received an email notification in ages and it's a pain in the arse. I only receive an email if someone actually quotes me.

Cheers

Neil.

really?

BTW I do get lots of email notifications....but I also 100% definately miss some.

  • 1 month later...

Was just about to hit new topic..

I'm subscribed to several threads, but only receive email notifications on 1 of them.

This week I've unsubscribed from that 1 thread and now don't receive any notifications.

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Reported posts are certainly working since the update that was made a few days ago.

Email notification for PM & Convos is 100% working as well.

You might need to re-jig your settings as mentioned earlier in this thread for Subscriptions

hmmm since your not getting any subscriptions at all maybe remove all watched topics and start again

you shouldn't need to tick a box every time you post, auto subscribe is in your Control Panel settings

in brief:

go to Manage Watched Topics >>Here<< put a tick in the box on the far right and then all the way down the bottom of the page unsubscribe

then

go to Notifications >>Here<< put a tick in the Watch every topic I reply to box and select immediate notification, fingers crossed that will fix your issues

How on earth is this not fixed yet, is there even a programmer that looks after the forum? It shouldn't be too much debugging to step through some code, look at logs and figure out why it isn't working. All the programmer needs is the login details of someone who is having issues.

nismoid, who is looking after the forum software? If someone feels like making me an admin and giving me some information I'm sure I can figure it out, just need access to the server and information on who set it all up.

Edited by Rolls

How on earth is this not fixed yet, is there even a programmer that looks after the forum? It shouldn't be too much debugging to step through some code, look at logs and figure out why it isn't working. All the programmer needs is the login details of someone who is having issues.

nismoid, who is looking after the forum software? If someone feels like making me an admin and giving me some information I'm sure I can figure it out, just need access to the server and information on who set it all up.

Did you see my message above yours?

It makes it a little hard when;

1. Its intermittent (I am receiving all notifications without problems, as are most people)

2. No errors are logged.

Hence why I need to keep asking if people are still having problems.

Just relax a little, eh?

I'll log a ticket with the forum guys and see if they have any ideas.

How on earth is this not fixed yet, is there even a programmer that looks after the forum? It shouldn't be too much debugging to step through some code, look at logs and figure out why it isn't working. All the programmer needs is the login details of someone who is having issues.

nismoid, who is looking after the forum software? If someone feels like making me an admin and giving me some information I'm sure I can figure it out, just need access to the server and information on who set it all up.

From the logs;

Oct 7 09:42:06 OR165 sendmail[24721]: p96Mg6Sb024719: to=rollie@YOURISP, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=121451, relay=ipmailmx.YOURISP. [YOUR-IP], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (ok: Message 317838246 accepted)

Nothing wrong there. Mail sent this morning at 9:42am and was accepted (stat=Sent (ok: Message 317838246 accepted))

Not overly helpful, eh? :)

Same for you, NYTSKY;

Oct 7 09:57:50 OR165 sendmail[24895]: p96Mvna0024893: to=nyt.sky@BLAH, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=120644, relay=mx1.BLAH. [bLAH-IP], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent ( <201110062257.p96Mvna0024893@OR165> Queued mail for delivery)

Mail was sent from SAU, but your mail site has queued it. Can you see if its in Spam or elsewhere ?

From the logs;

Oct 7 09:42:06 OR165 sendmail[24721]: p96Mg6Sb024719: to=rollie@YOURISP, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=121451, relay=ipmailmx.YOURISP. [YOUR-IP], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (ok: Message 317838246 accepted)

Nothing wrong there. Mail sent this morning at 9:42am and was accepted (stat=Sent (ok: Message 317838246 accepted))

Not overly helpful, eh? :)

Not really heh.

So can we get a list of people who don't get emails, and a couple of the threads you should be getting mail for?

Is it possible to set up the email service to send it to a local loopback email as well, eg everything is duplicated and sent to a folder as well, that way you can check if the problem is in the sending, or if the mail never even gets to the outbox.

My guess is there is something wrong with certain user groups

I receive emails for all my subbed topics

The odd thing is I had this issue and simply just removed and readded all my subscriptions as instant and it fixed it.

It is possible this is multiple different issues though, and what I did only fixed one of them, not the other one people are still experiencing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...