Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 467
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just make a cut in them with tin snips, then use some vice grips to tear them off, kind of "rolling" the grips to help tear the metal if you get what i mean?

They're just an interference press fit onto the hub, no need for major surgery to get them off, just bend/tear/snap them off :banana:

It can be fun getting them off - lots of twisting rolling and yanking with vise grips and bull nose pliers. I also used a hammer and chisel to clean up the last remnants off the back of the hub.

Look at the little bastard cowering in the background after I got all tony danza on its ass

post-12551-1284353144_thumb.jpg

i only remove the front stone guards, or else they would be hitting my disc :S

anyway received my pfc d-jetro in the mail today :D however im unsure if the sensors send with it are the map ones (as they look nothing like the normal ones i have seen other on the net)

dsc00059n.jpg

dsc00057cm.jpg

thanks :D i wasn't sure as they look very similar to the apexi boost gauge senders i had.

now just need to work out how to install them and off for a tune

Yeah electronic boost guages use a map sensor as well hence why they look the same - same thing with boost controllers (avc-r etc).

You just need to hook them up off a good vacuum / boost source off the intake manifold. It would be a bit different with the rb26 having individual throttle bodies - I have only ever installed map based ecu's on single throttle body systems. You would want the vacuum / boost seen after the throttle bodies.

Speak to someone who has installed d-jetro for sure!!

Yeah electronic boost guages use a map sensor as well hence why they look the same - same thing with boost controllers (avc-r etc).

You just need to hook them up off a good vacuum / boost source off the intake manifold. It would be a bit different with the rb26 having individual throttle bodies - I have only ever installed map based ecu's on single throttle body systems. You would want the vacuum / boost seen after the throttle bodies.

Speak to someone who has installed d-jetro for sure!!

Thanks did some looking looks like you need to tap some fitting onto cylinder 3 and 4 in the plenum.

So now just need to wait till i get my hks afmless pipe and blitz ebc (id3) and see it off toget a tune. Atm i increase boost to 1bar (bleed valve) and the cars feels alot better still laggy but pulls harder might just keep the n1 turbos for the moment and see what sort of times i xan get at the track

does anyone know how to determine the spring rate of a spring?

i have just purchase a set of coilovers to start off with, however they have had their springs swap for some swifts springs and the owner doesn't know the rate

Usually it is marked on the spring somewhere.

does anyone know how to determine the spring rate of a spring?

i have just purchase a set of coilovers to start off with, however they have had their springs swap for some swifts springs and the owner doesn't know the rate

Bloody easy since most of the steels used to produce these springs have very similar properties.

Try this calculator:

http://www.racingsuspensionproducts.com/spring%20rate.htm

Bloody easy since most of the steels used to produce these springs have very similar properties.

Try this calculator:

http://www.racingsuspensionproducts.com/spring%20rate.htm

thanks :geek: im hoping the spring rates aren't too crazy!

btw could someone explain to me what the helper springs do? (extra spring at the top of the normal spring)

thanks :) im hoping the spring rates aren't too crazy!

btw could someone explain to me what the helper springs do? (extra spring at the top of the normal spring)

You want crazy spring rates, the car will handle better that way

:P

Keeping the main spring captive under full droop is all they are there for.

You want crazy spring rates, the car will handle better that way

:(

Keeping the main spring captive under full droop is all they are there for.

The purpose of them varies depending on if they are helper springs or tender springs.

I'd assume being japanese they are probably only going to be a helper spring.

Article about Helper Springs vs Tender Springs

Sorry my mistake they come with Assist Springs

You want crazy spring rates, the car will handle better that way

:(

Keeping the main spring captive under full droop is all they are there for.

:(

Just because i wish to run 10/10 doesn't make them crazy spring rates, what i am worry about is that the spring rates will be in the 15 region as its not uncommon to run such rates in japan.

I understand that the general thinking is that 10/10 will be too stiff. However i have good experience with those spring rates in my r33 track car and will be testing similar rates out in the gtr. I plan to start with 6/8 combo however i need to do some reading on this Assist spring and select the correct rate for that combo. If 8/6 doesn't work i will move to 8/10 etc etc

till i find the right setup for my gtr

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...