Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I am wondering what is the most power someone has made through a standard RB25 intake pipe? (it can be sleeved with pipe)

Mine is currently making 279rwkw and i am wondering if it has much left in it. I am running an apexi pod filter, it can be either airbox or pod as long as its running through the standard intake pipe.

Any help much appreciated.

Thanks guys, i am running a hiflow with the standard comp cover so standard 2.5" intake, so I cant see the value in anything bigger than the factory intake pipe. Tao from Hypergear made 302rwkw using the same turbo but with a 3" metal intake pipe so I am just curious to hear some other real world results. I am hoping for 290rwkw.

Run 3inch intake pipe. Will make better power, response, and keep the turbo cooler. You will find metal sleeve does all sort of strange things. 60rwkws difference on mine, It did not work for me.

Run 3inch intake pipe. Will make better power, response, and keep the turbo cooler. You will find metal sleeve does all sort of strange things. 60rwkws difference on mine, I did not work for me.

Thanks Tao, I know your advice and I do value it.

I dont see the difference between:

pod > 3" afm > 3" pipe to 2.5" turbo inlet

pod > 3" afm > 3" pipe to 2.5" pipe to 2.5" turbo inlet

The only difference is that the standard pipe reduces to 2.5" (same size as turbo inlet) 8 cm earlier.

I understand completely if the turbo inlet is bigger than 2.5" but I just cant see the logic yet. If I lost less than 10rwkw I would accept that as my engine bay looks completely factory with a pod (my intercooler is also very hard to spot).

Oh well we will find out next thursday if it will max out.

I was recommended by unigroup to upgrade the intake...

i did make good power so i suppose it must have helped.

Thanks for your experience, only difference is you are running a turbo with a 3" inlet so using the standard intake would be an obvious reduction in diameter (2.5"). Also it just wouldnt fit.

I just made an 80mm alloy intake for GTR 26 on his 34gtt, it will be interesting to see the gains on his 3076 once Trent tunes it, I think the stock rubber intake maxed around the 270 mark.

Bigger is better for the suction pipe, and a good bell mouth into the turbo helps.

Interested in this myself.

I'm currently running 250rwkw on the standard pipe and have always wondered if it's upto the job. It's been reinforced with some pvc piping but there's a pretty nasty bend in it and the bend isn't reinforced.

Having less length of the 2.5" piping will increase flow and i'm sure the aftermarket piping will have a smoother internal make up and most important a smooth bend whilst not collapsing at all under vacuum.

I wonder if changing the pipe will bring enough difference to require a retune as that's whats holding me back from changing the pipe (and a couple other higher priority items i want to replace).

Interested in this myself.

I'm currently running 250rwkw on the standard pipe and have always wondered if it's upto the job. It's been reinforced with some pvc piping but there's a pretty nasty bend in it and the bend isn't reinforced.

Having less length of the 2.5" piping will increase flow and i'm sure the aftermarket piping will have a smoother internal make up and most important a smooth bend whilst not collapsing at all under vacuum.

I wonder if changing the pipe will bring enough difference to require a retune as that's whats holding me back from changing the pipe (and a couple other higher priority items i want to replace).

I made about 30 kw more with mine so yes, you should definitely get on the dyno at least to check afr's top end.

Cheers mate - What engine/setup was that on i.e. Your vq or on an rb motor?

Yeah thought the tune would need to be tweaked... i might leave it then as i'm pretty happy with the power anyways. When i do change it eventually i'll do it at the same time with a forward facing plenum and a retune to suit.

WOMG DOSE!

Edited by Touge Kyousou
Cheers mate - What engine/setup was that on i.e. Your vq or on an rb motor?

Yeah thought the tune would need to be tweaked... i might leave it then as i'm pretty happy with the power anyways. When i do change it eventually i'll do it at the same time with a forward facing plenum and a retune to suit.

WOMG DOSE!

Mine is VQ25det, but flow into a turbo doesnt change with engine type. Suction pipe size is important as the air isnt compressed like Stao mentioned, its at less than atmospheric pressure so less air travels down a 3 inch intake pipe than the turbo can blow down a 2 inch, good power gains to be made there.

3" alloy hard pipe, split the stock rubber intake down the middle, then wrap it over the alloy pipe. As long as you cut it correctly and use an extra hose clamp it will look factory.

I'd also run a stock air box with some 'slight' modifications to cut down on the fuuuully sizacccc 'dose' sound.

J.

Edited by XRATED

Cheers for the info. Good idea on wrapping the factory pipe over an alloy one too, hrmm!

I was looking at getting a silicone intake pipe in black though so should still look fairly harmless, and being silicone shouldn't make noises anymore hektik..

Ahh on a vq. I agree on no difference with air going down the turbo however the factory design of the intake pipe between an br25 and a vq25 would be vastly different i'd daresay e.g. one is happy to flow decent whereas the other may not. E.g. on my v35, that intake pipe had a large and a smallish resonator tee'd off for NVH whereas a skyline from the 90's probably wasn't as focused on NVH. Damnit, now i'm looking at intake pipe, plenum, and retune blargh! (i'll do it later)

I just made an 80mm alloy intake for GTR 26 on his 34gtt, it will be interesting to see the gains on his 3076 once Trent tunes it, I think the stock rubber intake maxed around the 270 mark.

Bigger is better for the suction pipe, and a good bell mouth into the turbo helps.

That will be very interesting, if you could update this thread with the results that would be great! :(

Yeah if those bellmouth things make more hp I can see the benefit of having a larger intake pipe immediately from the turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...