Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Geoff,

I noticed there's a new rear for the 6258's. Has there been any testing done against the original .64 rear ??

Would be interested to hear the resulting differences between the two...

(is it wrong to say I'm getting bored with only 500kw..??) :rofl2:


lol :ban: - in all seriousness, the singles have their place (got one on my car) but twin EFRs are next-level

I noticed there's a new rear for the 6258's. Has there been any testing done against the original .64 rear ??

Would be interested to hear the resulting differences between the two...

(is it wrong to say I'm getting bored with only 500kw..??) :rofl2:

hey John, have not done any back to back 0.64 vs 0.85 on an RB26 yet. built RB26's seem to prefer larger rear housings (within reason) so this is something brett was planning to do on his R34 in the next couple of months. Most of our higher power RB customers seem to go with the 6758 and 7163

it appears it was done in 3rd.. could an 8500rpm readline be correct? that means spooling (10psi) around 4500 and full boost (27psi) at 5800rpm

We typically see 1bar / 15psi around 3500rpm on 2.6L engines with the 8374. I expect we'd be flamed if our "response" based 62mm single turbo was spooling that late on an RB with vcam (10psi @4500)

  • Like 1

Hi Geoff,

I noticed there's a new rear for the 6258's. Has there been any testing done against the original .64 rear ??

Would be interested to hear the resulting differences between the two...

(is it wrong to say I'm getting bored with only 500kw..??) :rofl2:

lol :ban: - in all seriousness, the singles have their place (got one on my car) but twin EFRs are next-level

Chuck up your graph again mate?

What pressure are you running to net 500 kW?

We typically see 1bar / 15psi around 3500rpm on 2.6L engines with the 8374. I expect we'd be flamed if our "response" based 62mm single turbo was spooling that late on an RB with vcam (10psi @4500)

That's a fantastic result then, I was just having trouble reconciling the speed axis on that to RPM mathematically...

an EFR8374 is definately on the cards for me in the next year or so. Having Matchbot and all the turbo maps available is definitely a huge plus for the Borg. I can't make an educated decision on a 6262. its just "yea mate they're good for an RB26"..

I'm yet to stretch out my 2530s on E85, but I can't see them being as good.

Edited by burn4005

post-53650-0-80740800-1442274551_thumb.jpg

This goes back a few years now, I don't have a recent one saved anywhere as the result is always similar.

30spi dropping off, the larger rear housings might just be worth a try..

Alternatively now that I have my chassis all sorted (and bank account drained) I can probably look to go up to bigger twins or large single as I'm confident the car will now handle the extra power.

Chuck up your graph again mate?
What pressure are you running to net 500 kW?

I too am curious how the .64 and .85 compare in general. I have the .64 and would consider .85 if I didn't get enough out of the .64 but going with 6758 or 7163 twins sounds nuts.

too late to convert for me now.

I too am curious how the .64 and .85 compare in general. I have the .64 and would consider .85 if I didn't get enough out of the .64 but going with 6758 or 7163 twins sounds nuts.

too late to convert for me now.

i like 0.64 for street cars, but im into spool, torque and power band (im an engineering nerd). for a real race car that has a racing transmission and chassis, spool is not as important as outright power. 7163 appears to be slightly more surge resistant than 6758 so that is a plus for 7163 twin installs.

Having Matchbot and all the turbo maps available is definitely a huge plus for the Borg. I can't make an educated decision on a 6262. its just "yea mate they're good for an RB26"

great to hear you like the matchbot and data that is provided! i continue to learn all the time using that tool

attachicon.gifdyno677hp.jpg

This goes back a few years now, I don't have a recent one saved anywhere as the result is always similar.

30spi dropping off, the larger rear housings might just be worth a try..

Alternatively now that I have my chassis all sorted (and bank account drained) I can probably look to go up to bigger twins or large single as I'm confident the car will now handle the extra power.

swapping to stiffer IWG actuators on your existing 6258s may help carry boost in the higher RPM. turbosmart makes a quality actuator, just be aware it has less stroke than the standard BW and only 2mm preload is appropriate.

moving up to twin 7163s is worth consideration if you have the engine/displacement/head and really want to handle more power - its a direct fit to your 6258 install

So a 7670 would be sufficient to get at 600hp on e85 then?

7670 is really a 530-550hp turbo. For a true 600hp the EFR 8374 is the call. Internal WG with a stiff actuator gets it done nicely on E85 and a simple setup

Edited by Full-Race Geoff
  • Like 1

So on the topic of the efr wastegates I've been hearing more feedback from local tuners who struggle to have no boost creep or have unstable boost at whatever Desired setting and blade the efr wg. The builder/tuner is now pushing to change to the turbo smart actuators stating that they are just right. Why isn't anyone else reporting these issues? Also looks like it's a very tight fit fit with the efr actuators, will the turbosmart fit twins on the gtr?

As for turbo selection, I wasn't going after big power but my build took a few turns which is why I asked about the larger housings. I am after the low and mid range power.... I did not select the cams.

I run:

Tomei 2.8 short block (n1)

Tomei +1mm valves along with all their head upgrades and 290 deg 11.5mm lift cams

Ppg 1-5 helidog gear box and so on

So obviously it's too late to try and sell my turbos in favor of larger ones (hough they are new, people rarely buy 2 efrs at once) but I'm also not after huge power. So I should be OK with the smaller 6258 then...

I'd be happy with 600whp.

Edited by NismoSTune

I am after the low and mid range power...I'm also not after huge power. So I should be OK with the smaller 6258 then...I'd be happy with 600whp.

i believe 6258 0.64 is probably the perfect choice for you. Im running these turbos as twins on my current 3.5L v6 project. The turbosmart actuators will fit just fine.

We've seen excellent results with the OEM borgwarner stiff wastegate actuators -- up to 28psi. This is how borgwarner designed them and it works quite well. The original intent was to release a stiffer "higher boost actuator" that would go to 40psi. however the turbosmart options works very well and bw chose to focus on some other alternatives you may see at sema this year.

for more IWG control or for boost levels far beyond 28psi then the turbosmarts are an excellent choice. I personally worked with Jon at BW and we used alicat scientific equipment to provide turbosmart with our input on how to tweak and refine the IWG dual port before public release. They took our input into consideration and produced a nice quality gate. it is not at all mandatory, but it does have its place in the market

That's a fantastic result then, I was just having trouble reconciling the speed axis on that to RPM mathematically...

an EFR8374 is definately on the cards for me in the next year or so. Having Matchbot and all the turbo maps available is definitely a huge plus for the Borg. I can't make an educated decision on a 6262. its just "yea mate they're good for an RB26"..

I'm yet to stretch out my 2530s on E85, but I can't see them being as good.

My turbo manifold shipped today. I should have results of a pretty stout stroker 2.75L with ported head, +.5mm valves, springs, cams, hypertune V2, etc shortly on a 6boost manifold and 8374 EFR with .92 IWG setup.

I'd say I should have dyno results within 2 months max. I have had the "two steps forward, one back" constantly on my project so it's taken me forever waiting on new parts and fabbing stuff.

I never had issues with boost control on my T4 IWG 7163. Boost was always easy to control, but the tuner and I went for a creeping boost curve to give a nice powerband.

This is a 9.5:1 compression sr20vet (still 2L) by the way. Intake cam was advanced 4 cam degrees and the exhaust retarded 1 or 2. I will go again for a retune with +2 intake and - 1 exhaust which should bump power up a bit. I'll also fab up a 3.5" down/front pipe.

This dyno reads pretty low compared to most in Sydney. Slight dip in the power curve was because of a slight misfire. It made a few extra KW in a later pull (346kw) but i'm pretty happy with how it drives considering it makes this much power. The tuner was just so impressed and said this was way ahead of a normal sr22det with a gt3076r he tuned.

21476223050_4916737b3d_b.jpg

  • Like 1

Geoff you mean 2 boost controllers and 2 waste gates... right? Not 1 and 2?

Each turbo has its own solenoid is what I was told when I bought the twins, not 1 solenoid that splits to 2 turbos...

Edited by NismoSTune

No, two boost controllers will give instability as the integrals will fight each other. One solenoid goes to the two actuators. They should have the same preload so their opening characteristics are the same. Usually you wind up an air compressor regulator and make sure they move in unison.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...