Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nice info from the tuner. it really does look like a gun set-up.

Yeah good to see someone giving some extra information!

The power at 4000rpm is very impressive :)

I'm assuming the "old set up" is a stock 2.0L motor with a GT30ish sized turbo

The tuner posts some very nice and detailed info, that's great.

And wow, better power AND response than previous setup, agreed with SimonR32, looks like it was GT30-based. Win-win.

And it loses nothing to factory 4B11.

i want one now.

Even at 18psi it's an animal to make so much power as early as it does.

I wonder how an rb25 would go trying to spool it....

I would expect peak torque to be a little higher in the rev range but the transient area to be a little better to compensate (think linear inline 6 effect).

Now I want to see a 7064 on an SR, might just have to get one LOL

yeah I wonder how a 7670 would run at 30psi on my Jun RB27? but given how responsive the 9180 was on berrys RB30 I was thinking 8374 for me but if the 7670 can make the power I want (380-400kw atw) then why not use it? I'm still not convinced it's a genuine 600hp/400kw @ 30psi at the treads turbo though but if it is then it's bloody awesome.

Beer Baron - Depends on the dyno you're reading at the treads at, some rolling roads (ie, Dynojets) often read the same if not higher than Dynapacks... depending on the setups of course. This is ~470kw @ hubs, I'd say if this is a genuine reading, then I'd think 380-400kw on a DD should be realistic.

I can't believe how boost thirsty these things are....Hope my engines up to the task :wacko:

Its the EVO that needs that boost to make that power, though I'd still have gone the 9180 for an RB30 personally :thumbsup:

yeah I wonder how a 7670 would run at 30psi on my Jun RB27? but given how responsive the 9180 was on berrys RB30 I was thinking 8374 for me but if the 7670 can make the power I want (380-400kw atw) then why not use it? I'm still not convinced it's a genuine 600hp/400kw @ 30psi at the treads turbo though but if it is then it's bloody awesome.

My "410kw" on the same hub dyno with the same correction (SAE) went 360rwkw on a Dyno Dynamics roller...

So I would imagine the 30psi E85 run would be around the 400-420rwkw

Its the width of the compressor map that inspires me to say that more than the outright power numbers - will be interesting to see what kind of power the EFR8374 lets through when not pumping 2+bar through it.

Thanks, but I'm well aware that you've previously posted those results, not really any need for name calling, most of us are adults here.

Maybe on the dynos you use there is a 70kw difference.

  • Location:Perth.

Thanks, but I'm well aware that you've previously posted those results, not really any need for name calling, most of us are adults here.

Maybe on the dynos you use there is a 70kw difference.

  • Location:Perth.

I didn't call you a name?

The dynos I "use" is the same dyno with the same correction as the result of the Borg Warner EFR on the last page (so a viable comparison)... It's also the same dyno that STATUS (not from Perth) uses. (battery, with almost an identical set up to mine makes almost exactly the same power as mine on the STATUS dyno as mine does on the Allstar dyno)

It's also worth noting that we know the hub dyno reads higher than a roller, which is why we usually leave correction off. With correction turned off it's still 30kw difference between the hubber and the roller! The 2 runs were also on the same tank of fuel with about 50km of driving between the 2 dynos...

Also in regards to the shot at high reading dynos in Perth, good one... Original, pitty the mph does not lie!

Thanks, but I'm well aware that you've previously posted those results, not really any need for name calling, most of us are adults here.

Maybe on the dynos you use there is a 70kw difference.

  • Location:Perth.

Now you just sound incredibly ignorant.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
    • Any idea where I can get genuine MAF apart from used ones? I can't find any only for GTRs and unfortunately that price is not in my budget 🤣 I might gap my plugs down and put my splitfires in, they were only in for a year or so before I started the rebuild 
×
×
  • Create New...