Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can imagine it would be hard to be a tuner just like its hard to do any job but if I did something in my job that my client wasnt happy with they would ask why too wouldnt they...

oh slap, hey I should of just added a smiley face it was a bit pun from other threads I read, I have no experience with hypergear and I think he does a great job...

and I do appreciate your help, its more confirmation for me tbh Im obviously able to see there is a problem, I wouldnt say 'clearly need' though.

so do you have anything constructive to add or are you just venting?

The way it is written looks very different. I think you should change it as the way it is written is basically defamation of a company.

As others have said crank up the wastegate preload. It should only be roughly $100/hour of dyno time. It should be less than 2 hours.

Also pickup one of those $30 turbotech boost valves. It solved the GT3076 problem the other day.

I would be very tempted to have a cheapy turbotech boost controller handy just in case the PFC boost controller is either playing up or has been setup poorly.

$30 is cheap to rule out a potential problem.

Wastegate pre-load is still the most likely issue that needs to be checked.

I just swapped a GT-RS for a 2835ProS on the Stagea and it made 262rwkw at 16psi (bleeding to 15psi) and it was all in pretty much around 3300rpm (from memory). I know there is more average power to be had with fine tuning light, light/medium load but the headline number is pretty consistent with other results.

You will sort it out.

  • 4 weeks later...

Finally got the car back in for another tune with adjustment made to the wastegate... now making 290rwkw, I'll post the dyno sheet once I pick them up...

this time the dyno print should have rpm, boost & afr for a better overview...

Thats fantastic news mate! Well done. Awesome peak power figure and knowing the turbo it will have a very strong mid range.

Just concretes my opinion that these are the best turbo for a stockish RB25 engine.

Well all the reading and research lead me to believe this was the best choice turbo for response vs power, the tuner believes the turbo is too small, but maybe he thinks Im chasing power beyond the 2835s range, I would of been happy with 275-285rwkw tbh, which I thought the turbo was well able to do, much less and it would be in gtrs rhelms really wouldnt it...

I cant wait to post dyno sheets and see what people think... Im eager to see afr's myself

the .82 rear is optioned for the 1JZ as well.

I've just got my HKS GT2835 KAI kit, so I'm interested to see the difference in this over the Pro S. Supposed to be the new version of the Pro S but I cant find much info on it, other then it makes a couple of KW more at the cost of some torque? But its still a bit sketchy anyway lol.

Glad to see you got yours sorted mate. Will be helpful if something similar happens to me when my tune is started

Guys the 2835 Pro S kit for the RB25 definitely comes with the 0.68 exhaust housing by default:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/HKS-Turbo-Kit-GT283...=item20b4f48ef8

The 0.68 is how they get the awesome response and mid range, but it still seems to be big enough to flow 280-290rwkw on 98, which is enough for most people on stock rb25s.

If someone can repair turbos this could be a great buy:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/R33-R34-RB20-RB25-G...=item19c1223b3b

The 0.68 is how they get the awesome response and mid range, but it still seems to be big enough to flow 280-290rwkw on 98, which is enough for most people on stock rb25s.

Indeed it is a good turbo mate, HKS back cut the wheel so flow characteristics are anyones guess.. HKS know what they are doing tho, that turbo is GUN.

Numbers are one thing, but seeing on road results from a 2835 is totally another league.

i musta got the optioned one as i have an 0.82 rear on my Pro S kit sitting on my rb22

awesome... def waiting to see the graph.. +1 great turbo's and good results

Thats strange I thought the Pro S had either a 0.68 or 0.87 exhaust housing??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
×
×
  • Create New...