Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Stock rims Terry.

Bob, surely the owner wouldn't be dumb enough to drive a car with plates registered for a Ford, taking into account today's number plate recognition technology police cars are fitted with? Then again I've seen some crazier things.

Stock rims Terry.

Bob, surely the owner wouldn't be dumb enough to drive a car with plates registered for a Ford, taking into account today's number plate recognition technology police cars are fitted with? Then again I've seen some crazier things.

Hi Marco,

The number plate recognition will only sound alarm bells if a car is unregistered/stolen or anything that relates to that plate.

It doesn't know the car model.

Unless the policeman does an individual check on the car, nothing will happen.

I did a QLD and VIC check of that plate and nothing came up there either.

Presumably the 1959 relates to his birth year and his initials........ Another old fart driving an ADM! :yes::yes::yes::yes:

Bob.

My wife claimed to the see the same car a few weeks ago in chullora but I was sceptical. She heard it run and said it had work done to it...she knows her GTRs as I educated her well.

Aren't I a good man :)

I must that she is a rev head.

About 10yrs ago when I first had my ADM, she raced a yellow ford xygt which was highly modified and absolutely anihiliated it from a set of traffic lights...I was extremely proud :)

She also raced it around Wakefield and I couldn't believe the control she had when it was drifting all 4 wheels in 2nd and 3rd gear...I wasn't a good passenger and I have this on video.

Looks like another ADM has hit the market but unfortunately with next to no info............

http://carpoint.carpoint.ninemsn.com.au/all-cars/dealer/details.aspx?R=AGC-AD-17185313&Cr=1

Bob.

Yes, very light on detail!

So, the old girl is back with me, in my garage. its been in storage for about 12 months. Had 2 leaky valves and a flat battery. Drove beautifully, had no problems. That's a pretty good result for a 24yo car that hasn't been out for 12 months.

No airco though, ambient got up to 40.5c, steamy.

Hi Guys,

Just after some advice.

My stepfather owns an Aussie 91 R32 GTR which he unfortuantely due to sickness he can no longer drive. We are looking at selling it as it has just been sitting in the garage for at least the last four years. I am trying to get an idea of it's value and what a good website to sell it would be.

It's red, done 225K's and in good condition with the exception of the engine. I was told the turbo/s failed and have scratched the cylinder bore. Turbo or turbos have been replaced but the head needs some work. it was driven home and parked in the garage and has sat there since.

10584855_10203116886098904_1248652271_n.
upload pictures online

10726407_10203116886458913_1849618438_n.
free pic

Cheers Guys

Edited by Kasey Bradley

Just seen a black adm number plates PL 120 on cumberland hwy heading towards greystanes will put up a photo when im home

spotted old mate tonight, on the M4. good to see it out and about :)

BTW Kasey reduce the average sale prices by 10-15k for the blown motor and you'll be about right. Not sure who came to the conclusion that head work is required, it is almost certainly a bottom end rebuild that is required including new bearings and probably boring out the cylinders to remove the scores (which will also require aftermarket oversize pistons). Not a big deal, but not minor either...been there, done that before

Where is the car, I've been keeping an eye out for something that has original bits but needs some work.

Also, this forum is probably the best place to sell it to a genuine buyer that understands why it is worth more than imported GTRs.

Just got the heads up....... This one will be listed tonight!

Wait until you see the price.

Bob.

Took 7 months to sell but it has.

Lovely car!

Bob.

http://www.classicthrottleshop.com/modernclassic22.html

post-78207-0-30474900-1421919113_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...