Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lets put it a more logical way - why do you want to go with the Avo .73a/r housing when there is a housing option which is proven to get the most out of the GT3076R which comes with the turbo? For all I can tell you want to do it just because, because there is no logical reason I can think of. The turbo comes with the Garrett housing, its easy to get a dump pipe made up for it, and most importantly you KNOW its going to work.

Not saying the Avo housing won't - but why take the more difficult and expensive option when there is a known quantity? It doesn't make sense to me.

Thank you for you putting it in a more logical way and not just speaking fir the hell of it.

I was aiming at .73 in an attempt to get a balance between the more responsive .63 and higher flowing .82. Also keep my dump pipe.

Edited by ShiftyTys

If you were thinking of a GT3076 and wanted something in between .06 and 0.8 for a mix of response and power, would a 3071 in a 0.8 housing fit the bill? Pretty sure there were dyno results recently posted that had 270kw and really good response?

Is this the Gtx series ur referring to? Cos yeh I know that's another option. May be leading that way....

I was aiming at .73 in an attempt to get a balance between the more responsive .63 and higher flowing .82. Also keep my dump pipe.

OK. For what its worth, I feel the difference (having had both) between a .63 and .82 is minimal - I run a .82 and don't feel robbed of down low, it has a very nice power delivery. If you are really that worried about a bit of a mix, just get an HKS GT3037 with .68 housing.

I was aiming at .73 in an attempt to get a balance between the more responsive .63 and higher flowing .82. Also keep my dump pipe.

You can't directly compare a 0.73 non-native housing to a garrett housing. It is based on a ratio and it won't be same when you compare housings.

You can't directly compare a 0.73 non-native housing to a garrett housing. It is based on a ratio and it won't be same when you compare housings.

Yeah look I think I'm leaning towards. Gtx3071 with .82. I appreciate your advice regarding 63 and 82.

Have ordered gtx3071 .82.

Currently running :

Link G4 ecu ( No AFM)

Front mount

Turbo back 3" stainless zorst

Gizzmo IBC boost controller.

Wallbro 550hp fuel pump

Custom fabricated airbox.

Valeo sports clutch (expecting that to go soon after turbo installed)

191.4 rwkw at 13psi

Getting:

Gtx3071 .82

Fuel rail

Injectors (ready for e85 but not using yet)

Aiming for about 260rwkw.

Sounds like a defect/EPA waiting to happen mate, really hope you don't get pulled over...

You should make 300rwkw on PULP though either way. 260 is rather conservative and a normal GT3071 will do that.

Awesome - looking forward to seeing how that goes, it is definitely what I was sold on until I saw the first results of the GTX mid frame turbos. Good luck, could be interesting :)

I finally just took delivery of my new GTX3071R!!! Here are some pics up against what it is replacing.

If the GTX wheels work like their maps show then mated to a 0.82 turbine housing should be the right combo for and RB25.

post-31977-0-32226100-1298626006_thumb.jpg

post-31977-0-85812000-1298626018_thumb.jpg

post-31977-0-60972500-1298626029_thumb.jpg

post-31977-0-76261500-1298626038_thumb.jpg

post-31977-0-22773000-1298626054_thumb.jpg

post-31977-0-91998600-1298626061_thumb.jpg

post-31977-0-71837000-1298626072_thumb.jpg

Edited by JustinP

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...