Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On ‎1‎/‎02‎/‎2017 at 6:46 AM, Lithium said:

I'm so far relatively impressed with the Gen2 GTX3582R, met a lad with one on his fresh RB26 build at a track day I was at on Monday - running a 1.01a/r twin scroll T3 hotside on BP98.  I don't have much info on it, but I did see a dyno plot at the track and it was near 200kw by 4000rpm and made 460kw @ rear hubs (I'd call that around 410rwkw if you can't understand hub dynos) on 21psi.  It had a beautiful power curve for that level, with peak coming in at just after 7000rpm but holding >450kw all the way up to the 8000rpm they ran it to.

It seems like Garrett may have managed to go to a 66mm inducer without sacrificing too much in the way of response, and clearly have managed to do very good things for flow.  The car had quite a happy wee anti-surge whistle too, a bit less low-key than the Gen1 GTX - I have a soft spot for that noise so a good thing in my books haha.  

Thanks for the info', Lith. Good to see more results from the Gen2 GTX range popping up - a very positive result too. Approximately 410kW at the wheels on a roller dyno running 'only' 21psi and BP98 is a solid result. 

I was chatting to a guy in WA via FB yesterday afternoon about his 1.5JZ + GTX3584RS with 0.83 housing. His combo currently produces 447kW at 27psi through a build auto with 3,000rpm stall. I expect it would make a fair bit more via a 5sp manual.     

  

I saw a recent FB post regarding an RB26 + GTX3584RS fitted to a blue R34 track car in WA. The combination makes 650hp. The only details I could find on this set-up unfortunately. I assume it's a wheel horsepower figure.

My turbine housing is back from ceramic coating and the compressor housing has been polished. I'm hoping to have the housings refitted and ready to bolt it all on in the next week or two.

I've been away with work (beyond network coverage range at times) in recent weeks and extremely busy. Hence the lack of updates of late.

 

 

Update:
The blue R34 is running E85, 0.84 housing, 24psi, and currently produces peak boost at 4800rpm. The owner has plans to bring boost on earlier with cam timing adjustment.

  • Like 1
20 minutes ago, whatsisname said:

Update:
The blue R34 is running E85, 0.84 housing, 24psi, and currently produces peak boost at 4800rpm. The owner has plans to bring boost on earlier with cam timing adjustment.

Guessing that meant .83?   4800rpm sounds realistic for stock stroke and 24psi,  not bad given the flow potential tbh... be interesting to know more.  At that rate it'd be very usable on a 3litre :)

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Lithium said:

Guessing that meant .83?   4800rpm sounds realistic for stock stroke and 24psi,  not bad given the flow potential tbh... be interesting to know more.  At that rate it'd be very usable on a 3litre :)

I assume so - the owner wrote .84 but probably just a fat fingers moment. I'm hoping to discuss our respective combo's in a further detail.

Mate, I cannot wait to find out for myself! I'm away again for most of the remainder of this week. Then it's Round 1 of the SA IPRA championship. Probably away again after that. Then we're racing at Clipsal. It is a hectic schedule. But hopefully we can squeeze my turbo upgrade in there somewhere.   

I can confirm the WA based R34 I mentioned earlier currently produces 650hp at the rears.

RB26 with GTX3584RS .83 making 485kW at the rear wheels running E85 on 24psi boost. Currently produces peak boost at 4800rpm but expecting this to improve via cam timing adjustments and further tuning.

Combo' has more in it but power capped due to concerns over gearbox longevity - it's a track car.

 

I know there will be a GTX3584RS on a RB26 (R32 GTR) getting tuned in the next few weeks... I'll try and post results if I remember 


Which exhaust housing and any other info on the set up?

As do I. I'm guessing it may end up closer to 4500-4600rpm once sorted. Twin scroll would obviously be even better.

I'm hoping my RB25/30 with the larger 1.01 will see full boost by around 4000-4500rpm.

 

3 hours ago, whatsisname said:

I can confirm the WA based R34 I mentioned earlier currently produces 650hp at the rears.

RB26 with GTX3584RS .83 making 485kW at the rear wheels running E85 on 24psi boost. Currently produces peak boost at 4800rpm but expecting this to improve via cam timing adjustments and further tuning.

Combo' has more in it but power capped due to concerns over gearbox longevity - it's a track car.

 

Did he say which shop's dyno this was on?

Garrett have not developed a twin scroll option (as yet) but I believe ATP were planning to offer suitable twin scroll housings.  

Edit: ATP do indeed. Only available in 1.01 A/R.

It's basically a modified GT/GTX35 housing. I assume any T3 GT/GTX35 housing can be modified to suit the GTX3584RS. The incompatibility warning from Garrett is aimed at existing GT/GTX owners looking to upgrade their current turbo to the RS. Off-the-shelf they aren't reverse compatible. But nothing stopping people from having housings modified to fit.       

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:
Garrett T3 Twinscroll turbine housing in Ni-Resist material; for GT35, GTX35, and GEN2 GTX35 series turbochargers. The turbine housing is 1.01 A/R and 3-inch Garrett GT V-Band outlet.

** Available for the Garrett GTX3584RS. Choose the required alternate fitment option **

http://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=tp&Product_Code=ATP-HSG-210&Category_Code=GTH

 

ATP-HSG-210_450-1.jpg

Okay, so we've managed to set aside a few days before Clipsal to fit and tune the new turbo. If all goes roughly to plan, should have it on the dyno in two weeks.

  • Like 2
14 hours ago, whatsisname said:

Okay, so we've managed to set aside a few days before Clipsal to fit and tune the new turbo. If all goes roughly to plan, should have it on the dyno in two weeks.

Awesome, keen to see how it goes - good luck :)

Just as a reminder, you are on a 3litre, still VCT and some kind of drop in cams?  You have gone the 1.01 T3 hotside?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...