Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wanted to thank everyone for the great information found here on M35's without your info i wouldnt have bought one.

Just put down my deposit yesterday while they finish compliancing.

2003 M35 250t RS Autech

80,000k's

Aftermarket Alarm

Aftermarket TV/SatNAV/DVD Player. (Its a AVIC-XH9 all in japanese would love if someone had some info on this!) I am hoping if i cant get it converted to English i could at least replace the feed and keep the LCD).

The didnt come with cruise control which is unfortunate can anyone recommend a place in melbourne?

A couple of pics attached.

post-78191-1289769398_thumb.jpg

post-78191-1289769408_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344313-got-one/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

import factory in Nunawading right? Looks familiar.

Car looks exactly like mine except for the front...still waiting for my aero front bar....

AVIC - sounds like a Pioneer product...if it is I'd head over to avic411.com and see if anyone's done a conversion.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344313-got-one/#findComment-5549809
Share on other sites

haha yes i thought the same Chris :D If i am lucky i will get to reuse the screen.

Ironpaw yup Import Factory. Thatnks for the link for AVIC411 will check it out.

Iamhe77 why isnt it an autech? (body kit looks right and it has the badge - though honestly i wouldnt know).

pic of interior attached. :blush:

post-78191-1289853186_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344313-got-one/#findComment-5551454
Share on other sites

You have an aero front bar, but not the entire kit.

still looks the goods tho :D

the autech badge is becoming a mystery! it appears on aero models, but from what we can tell, only the AXIS model was done by autech.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344313-got-one/#findComment-5551588
Share on other sites

Iamhe77 why isnt it an autech? (body kit looks right and it has the badge - though honestly i wouldnt know).

Sorry man, it has an Nissan "Aero" front bumper and the rest of the bodywork is pure RS.... plus the badge on the back says "RS"

An Autech Axis (that is what they're called) has a very different front bumper, grill, bonnet ornament, rear bumper, 18" wheels, Autech suspension and colour coded ARX type flared guards as you can see below

2002NissanStageaM35Axis.jpg

2002Axiswithrearreflectorcovers.jpg

As you can see on the rear shot, an Autech has an "Axis" badge, certainly not an RS badge.

Edited by iamhe77
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344313-got-one/#findComment-5551814
Share on other sites

Chassis number is 6u90000nm35318643

'u' could be an 'a' (handwriting).

So the later models have colour coded skirts and rear bumber? (i saw alot where these where all dark grey).

I was aware there is an AXIS AUTECH that looks like the pics above.. though i thought there was a AUTECH non axis as well that didnt have those features..

Either way i would have bought it regardless. >_<

So mine is all factory body except for the front air dam?

thanks WHT510.. you too! you bloody following me round or wot?? same cars in the past now the present.. same dealer!

yeah i think i saw yours.. black leather and aftermarket brembos?

Edited by Sage222
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344313-got-one/#findComment-5552730
Share on other sites

The one I picked up has the aero selection kit which looks like yours (except for the front bar - I have the standard front bar...for now >_< ). I also got the Autech sticker on the boot and the "tuned by autech" sticker above the glove box. Don't ask me why/how...

Who did you deal with at ImportFactory? Did they go down much in price? I was looking at a JZX100 there a few weeks ago...

At least you got colour coded door strips...I really want to replace mine! Probably would be $$$$$ though...

post-75595-1289901424_thumb.jpg

post-75595-1289901457_thumb.jpg

post-75595-1289901470_thumb.jpg

Edited by ironpaw
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344313-got-one/#findComment-5552762
Share on other sites

Chassis number is 6u90000nm35318643

Well, f**k me! It IS an Autech :)

My apologies mate, I have never seen an Autech model without the bodykit & wheels before :)

post-31842-1289947861_thumb.jpg

lol... nearly 4 years of ownership and still learning :D

Edited by iamhe77
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344313-got-one/#findComment-5553324
Share on other sites

Well, f**k me! It IS an Autech :)

My apologies mate, I have never seen an Autech model without the bodykit & wheels before :)

lol... nearly 4 years of ownership and still learning :D

:rofl: I wonder what on earth they (Autech) did to it :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344313-got-one/#findComment-5553347
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...