Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I wonder how that goes for tipping if anyone chose him or anyone that gets replaced for that matter I'm advance

Fair to say anyone that tipped Trulli to be anywhere near the top 10 would be doing so badly in tipping that it wouldn't matter

Mark Webber says that after talks with team boss Christian Horner he is free to race team-mate Sebastian Vettel, at least "most of the time."

Following the British GP, during which Webber was told to hold stations while fighting Vettel for second place, the Aussie publicly admitted that he was not happy with the use of team orders.

He also revealed that he had ignored them for as long as possible. This, as to be expected, resulted in a behind-closed-doors chat with team boss Horner.

However, it seems Webber is happy with the outcome of the conversation, revealing that if the situation were to be reversed in the future, Vettel would also be told not to attack.

"We had a chat straight after the race debrief. Christian put his view forward of how the situation built and he came to the decision he made.

"And I put my case forward in how the situation built and we thought that we were both making the right decision - him to make the call for the team's interests and I was in a situation where I was trying to improve my own position.

"We spoke about it. He guaranteed me that it would have been the same situation the other way around if Seb was closing in on me, he would have still shut the race down.

"It was over pretty quick really.

"If there is a similar situation, it is not often that you are closing in the last few laps, that was the awkward one I think.

"We are still free to race most of the time - it was an awkward one and it is not often that things like that happen in terms of the time of the race, and up until then we will be racing."

Pressed as to why he had initially chosen to ignore his pit wall during the British race, Webber said it was in response to Horner's comments last season about never enforcing team orders on his drivers like Ferrari did at the 2010 German GP.

"That's why I made the decision. I wasn't thinking about Hockenheim, but I was thinking about trying to pass Sebastian.

"He was not having the best stint for him and I was having a reasonable stint so I was just trying to pass him, clearly there is a question you need to ask him - see how he feels about it now.

"Nothing really changes for me. I am comfortable with what I did at Silverstone.

"The points are important, but it is momentum and having the opportunity to improve. If Fernando is stopping on the last lap, which is unusual, but if he is...it makes it a bit more tricky.

"There are some questions that you guys need to ask Christian, which I cannot answer."

p2.

Times

01. Mark Webber Red Bull-Renault 1m31.711 34 laps

02. Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1m31.879 + 0.168 38 laps

03. Sebastian Vettel Red Bull-Renault 1m32.084 + 0.373 28 laps

04. Felipe Massa Ferrari 1m32.354 + 0.643 36 laps

05. Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1m32.411 + 0.700 31 laps

06. Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1m32.557 + 0.846 32 laps

07. Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 1m32.724 + 1.013 28 laps

08. Nick Heidfeld Renault 1m33.098 + 1.387 17 laps

09. Vitaly Petrov Renault 1m33.138 + 1.427 22 laps

10. Adrian Sutil Force India-Mercedes 1m33.211 + 1.500 34 laps

11. Jenson Button McLaren-Mercedes 1m33.225 + 1.514 17 laps

12. Paul di Resta Force India-Mercedes 1m33.299 + 1.588 34 laps

13. Sergio Perez Sauber-Ferrari 1m34.113 + 2.402 34 laps

14. Rubens Barrichello Williams-Cosworth 1m34.344 + 2.633 34 laps

15. Jaime Alguersuari Toro Rosso-Ferrari 1m34.487 + 2.776 37 laps

16. Kamui Kobayashi Sauber-Ferrari 1m34.491 + 2.780 35 laps

17. Pastor Maldonado Williams-Cosworth 1m34.996 + 3.285 35 laps

18. Heikki Kovalainen Lotus-Renault 1m35.753 + 4.042 42 laps

19. Timo Glock Virgin-Cosworth 1m36.940 + 5.229 32 laps

20. Karun Chandhok Lotus-Renault 1m37.248 + 5.537 33 laps

21. Jerome D'Ambrosio Virgin-Cosworth 1m37.313 + 5.602 33 laps

22. Tonio Liuzzi HRT-Cosworth 1m38.145 + 6.434 31 laps

23. Daniel Ricciardo HRT-Cosworth 1m40.737 + 9.026 5 laps

24. Sebastien Buemi Toro Rosso-Ferrari No time 3 laps

this is going to be a good race

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...