Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If they're like the 4-9 the exhaust manifold they link the outer and the inner pairs of exhaust ports ie 1+4 aqnd 2+3 .

That way when the inline four cylinder goes through its 1-3-4-2 firing sequence it alternates between each side or outlet port of the exhaust manifold . The idea is that each cylinder vents into an area of low pressure because the last vented into the other side of the manifold and turbine housings scroll . This way more of the exhausting cylinders thermally excited exhaust energy (gas velocity) is screaming into the turbine blades .

Where you have a single outlet manifold and single passage or scroll turbine housing all cylinders vent into the common manifold/housing meaning the average pressure inside it is higher , because of this each venting cylinder is venting into an area of higher pressure and can't exert as much energy or gas velocity into the turbine blades because of the lesser pressure differential .

You can reduce the pressure in a single scroll system by increasing the size of the turbine housing but you lose turbine response by doing it .

Twin scroll systems allow you to use bigish A/R turbine housings without much of the turbine lag so they are a win at low to medium as well as higher engine revs .

Interestingly the Americans have come up with a torque number that they try not to exceed because if they do they bend connecting rods and break pistons - on std 4G63T engines anyway . I think its something like 400-420 ft/lbs they try to torque limit them too and go looking for cams revs and Hp numbers instead .

Personally I like the idea of those sorts of torque numbers at 3-3500 revs because it makes a Lancer with AWD and sort of short closish ratio gearing a slingshot off the line and they pull like buggery in every gear .

My 6 is mechanicaly std ATM but after the first time I chased a bike off at the lights and nearly ran over it I learnt not to do that .

A .

Um BTW , a correctly phased inline six cylinder twin scroll exhaust manifold links 123 and 456 . This is because an inline sixs firing order is 153624 and to alternate evenly between exhaust events thats how the manifold has to be . Its also done this way with parallel twin turbos on an inline 6 for the same reasons .

12cm evo X housing, now were talking business.

I think a call to GTP is in order... I need more info re reverse rotation turbos. There has got to be a reason why they are able to use SL2 and 20G wheels in the reverse rotation housings..

Need to get back on topic, poor Kando!

Try the evo forums mate,

They love those FP turbos !

Good mate of mine is about to put an FP RED onto his V, will be interesting to see the outcome.

At this point thinking around 300WKW with fairly reasonable response.

Will post back when we have data.

those are the ones

massive fan of trust

have had 2530 with a single 20g

WOA, YOU!

How did you find the 20G on power for a 6?

How much power did it push? And what exhaust wheel were you running with what size rear housing?

Sorry for the attack, just trying to gauge as much as I can on the 20G topic.

Thanks,

yea i have heard of people running 270rwkw

but on this engine ( tired a bit... blowby)

the most the poor little sucker could muster was 250rwkw

ran 114mph in a 1650kg car so sounds about right

in the zed it made just over 520rwkw with two of them thorugh a auto( allegedly)

felt dam fast the zed

youve not seen the results from Simon? lol

Im tempted to go the kando SL2 20G but Im not sure if I should try something outrageous and go for an evo twinscoll housing to match.

Your results do give me some confidence that it would be an epic turbo for the RB25, 250kw@12psi and 12psi by 2300 would probably be no more than 1000rpm worse on a 2.5L (more like 500 I think) and would easily push the same figure with an extra 2psi. Evo dudesssss push these things to 1.8 bar NO WORRIES (actually they do that with the stock 16g too).

Majorly considering a simple T3 IW 8cm job when its available.. Kando = winnarr

Love the sound of these turbo's, very impressive!

Finally a turbo that bridges the gap between cheap ebay turbo's and expensive jap ones!

My mate put me onto this thread, but I'm still unsure of which one I should run:

rb30det with stock (healthy) internals....would be happy with 260-310 responsive kw's.....going in an s13 skidder (100% track car)

td06 or t67? 20g or 25g? 8cm, 10cm or 12cm?

If your that excited maybe just read through the thread.

The t67 with 10cm rear that Simon is running would be a great turbo for an RB30 although you will make more than 310rwkw pretty easily. Will you be running an aftermarket manifold and external wastegate?

Just a quick question, as I have recently purchased one of these turbo's (Identical to SimonR32)

One of the first things i noticed after taking it out of the box, was the fact that there was a small amount of shaft play. As in, you can move it from side to side (not enough for the blades to touch the housing) but they come very close.

So my question is, is this sort of thing normal for this type of turbo? SimonR32, was this the case with yours?

Or should I be sending it back for a replacement...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Price seems pretty good to me. Also seems a hell of a lot cheaper then buying another vehicle that only ever gets used for towing.  I'm a long way from you mate, I'm a couple of hours out of Brizzy. 
    • New [400]Z, they're available in manual and you don't have to worry about parts scarcity. 
    • Just planning to have the wiring neat and hide as much as possible.
    • The sodium acetate, mixed with citric acid, doesn't actually buffer each other. Interestingly though, if you used Sodium Acetate, and acetic acid, THAT becomes a buffer solution. Additionally, a weak acid that can attack a metal, is still a weak acid that can attack a metal. If you don't neutralise it, and wash it off, it's going to be able to keep attacking. It works the same way when battery acid dries, get that stuff somewhere, and then it gets wet, and off it goes again breaking things down. There's a reason why people prefer a weak acid, and it's because they want TIME to be able to be on their side. IE, DIY guys are happy to leave some mild steel in vinegar for 24 hours to get mill scale off. However, if you want to do it chemically in industry, you grab the muriatic acid. If you want to do it quicker at home, go for the acetic acid if you don't want muriatic around. At the end of the day, look at the above thumbnail, as it proves what I said in the earlier post, you can clean that fuel tank up all you want with the solution, but the rust that has now been removed was once the metal of the fuel tank. So how thin in spots is your fuel tank getting? If the magazine on the left, is the actual same magazine as on the right, you'll notice it even introduces more holes... Well, rust removal in general actually does that. The fuel tank isn't very thick. So, I'll state again, look to replace the tank, replace the fuel hanger, and pump, work out how the rust and shit is making it past the fuel filter, and getting into the injectors. That is the real problem. If the fuel filter were doing its job, the injectors wouldn't be blocked.
    • Despite having minimal clothing because of the hot weather right now, I did have rubber gloves and safety glasses on just in-case for most of the time. Yes, I was scrubbing with my gloves on before, but brushing with a brush removes the remaining rust. To neutralize, I was thinking distilled water and baking soda, or do you think that would be overkill?
×
×
  • Create New...