Jump to content
SAU Community

Kando Dynamics Turbo


SimonR32

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

has anyone tried the Kando Dynamic TD06L2-20g 10cm rear on an rb25 yet?

I have an adapter to run an external gate on the stock manifold and i just want to hit 280rwkw, im thinking the L2 may fall short?

They are about $800 delivered from Kando, I am itching to buy one.

To note, the T67 wheel and 10cm housing OBVIOUSLY has no power restriction (ref Simons results) and results for the td06sl2-20g can be seen on more evos than you can poke a stick at.

Evos generally do not struggle to make 260AWKW from the said turbo on a 10.5cm rear housing and are generally on full song by 4500rpm with epic spool before that also.

The fastest evo I have driven had a td06sl2-20g 10.5cm and 272 cams, it would out rev the motor and had some serious pull from about the 3000rpm range, it had made 280AWKW on that setup and featured in a magazine. Others have made over 300awkw on these turbos with E85.

Might I add we have seen Roy get 260rwkw from an RB20 of all motors on one of these turbos, with VERY acceptable spool. An RB25 would possibly spool one of these better than your average highflow.

I have a feeling that we are fools for overlooking these turbos. I really am looking at grabing one for my 1J and having an all out balistic sub 300rwkw setup. The price of my turbo, manifold and gate will rival the cost of a garrett on its own.

Sorry for the Hijack Simon, Im going to put together a thread some time with links to your own results (for ref to the T67 rear and 10cm housing) along with evo results (for ref of the T67 combined with 20g front on a itty bitty 2L) very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have ordered a t67 to go with my 6boost and 44mm tial...

Came to this decision over the td06l2 cause of posts on a

Subaru forum where the concensuss was that the L2 was too small for the 2.5l boxer engine

See how I go if it's too laggy ill just swap on a td06l2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are about $800 delivered from Kando, I am itching to buy one.

To note, the T67 wheel and 10cm housing OBVIOUSLY has no power restriction (ref Simons results) and results for the td06sl2-20g can be seen on more evos than you can poke a stick at.

Evos generally do not struggle to make 260AWKW from the said turbo on a 10.5cm rear housing and are generally on full song by 4500rpm with epic spool before that also.

The fastest evo I have driven had a td06sl2-20g 10.5cm and 272 cams, it would out rev the motor and had some serious pull from about the 3000rpm range, it had made 280AWKW on that setup and featured in a magazine. Others have made over 300awkw on these turbos with E85.

Might I add we have seen Roy get 260rwkw from an RB20 of all motors on one of these turbos, with VERY acceptable spool. An RB25 would possibly spool one of these better than your average highflow.

I have a feeling that we are fools for overlooking these turbos. I really am looking at grabing one for my 1J and having an all out balistic sub 300rwkw setup. The price of my turbo, manifold and gate will rival the cost of a garrett on its own.

Sorry for the Hijack Simon, Im going to put together a thread some time with links to your own results (for ref to the T67 rear and 10cm housing) along with evo results (for ref of the T67 combined with 20g front on a itty bitty 2L) very soon.

Thread is about Kando/Kinugawa/Kamak turbos not my results, so any results you have feel free to stick them up on here :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have ordered a t67 to go with my 6boost and 44mm tial...

Came to this decision over the td06l2 cause of posts on a

Subaru forum where the concensuss was that the L2 was too small for the 2.5l boxer engine

See how I go if it's too laggy ill just swap on a td06l2

The TD06SL2 is the same wheel as the T67 Simon is running.

The turbo you noted prior is the exact turbine wheel and exhaust housing.

Simon has made 410rwkw with it, no restriction.

Maybe the Subaru boys were refering to a different wheel, not the SL2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The TD06SL2 is the same wheel as the T67 Simon is running.

The turbo you noted prior is the exact turbine wheel and exhaust housing.

Simon has made 410rwkw with it, no restriction.

Maybe the Subaru boys were refering to a different wheel, not the SL2.

Yeah the TD06SL2 has the same exhaust wheel and housing as a T67 but with 20g compressor and housing to suit. I would still think a T67 would be better on a RB25 and the SL2 for a RB20

410kw was a little bit of a piss take with correction on... More realistically it makes 390kw on a hub dyno and 360rwkw on a dyno dynamics roller :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...