Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what would be the closest equivalent to a gt35r with 1.06 rear?

TD06H 25G 12cm

For people unaware this is being suggested because he is used a 4.5L motor, it is not the all out performance replacement to the 35R.

You would want this if you are after a kando:

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-Anti-Surge-TD06H-25G-T3-12cm-/270807644010?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f0d64b76a

Or this may be a lot better for your application:

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Turbocharger-HINO-JO8C-24100-3251-GARRETT-GT3576-479016-/290609084681?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43a9a6b909

Better spread of torque, not so much 'performance' based. Will do more of the heavy work that a 4by would normally do.

TD06H 25G 12cm

For people unaware this is being suggested because he is used a 4.5L motor, it is not the all out performance replacement to the 35R.

You would want this if you are after a kando:

http://www.ebay.com....=item3f0d64b76a

Or this may be a lot better for your application:

http://www.ebay.com....=item43a9a6b909

Better spread of torque, not so much 'performance' based. Will do more of the heavy work that a 4by would normally do.

Thanks for your help. I've been looking at this-

http://www.ebay.com....=item3f0d202c19

What do you think? I'd prefer IWG

Edited by O2 Autosports

ok , so theese are dimentialy the same, just not actually made in japan using quality materials. but are one of the better "bing whoa" coppies?

I hear they are made in dirty backyard toilet labs by unsavoury types using battery acid and horse tranquilizers .. :whistling:

Thanks for your help. I've been looking at this-

http://www.ebay.com....=item3f0d202c19

What do you think? I'd prefer IWG

The IW housing they have is very similar to the Trust 12cm item. Try to stick to both 12cm or bigger and the TD06H wheel.

Incase you havent read the whole thread, the following are the TD06 wheels in size and flow:

TD06S 65mm OD - lowest flow

TD06SL2 61mm OD - high flow good balance with spool

TD06SH 67mm - highest flow

They all have the designation 'S' whether it says it or not. Do not confuse a TD06Sh or TD06H as two different items, they are the same. Some tend to drop the S as its not needed.

You have a giant engine so I encourage you to stick to the biggest parts you can.

Try look for a TD06H 25G with 12cm rear housing and 24v front cover. Maybe email them to ask if they can make this and for under $800....

how would these kando turbos compare to a hypergear turbo, reliability and performance wise? or is that a how long is a piece of "insert very long material" question?

Yes, how long is a piece of string fits well. The better question is what do you want...... Kando has got a lot of cars covered, Evos, Subys, SR20s and generic.

The skyline stuff falls into the generic catagory, which need custom everything that touches the turbo. Custom manifold, custom wastegate, custom dump pipe. Even the internal wastegate turbos kando do will need custom dumps and spacers off the stock manifold.

If you like what you see from the T67, get one and get the bits mentioned necessary to make it work.

If you want it to bolt on and fit easily, have a look at Hypergears current turbos and pick the one which makes the power u want.

At the end of the day its power and method. Some of us would prefer a 20g over the HG SS turbos, fast spool and up to 300kw. There is likely to be little benefit at the end of the day... And it will need a manifold and gate whereas the HG will not.

Answer: if you want less than 300kw just get a HG. If you want 300+ get the T67. If your not sure, also get the HG because the Kandos will need some serious effort applied.

how would these kando turbos compare to a hypergear turbo, reliability and performance wise? or is that a how long is a piece of "insert very long material" question?

For under 300kw I would go the HG every time, fitment wise it bolts on with very little drama, internal gate so looks stock, great response and power, they are also cheap. Kandos are cheaper but you need manifold, dump and gate, so by the time you are finish they will cost more most of the time, however if you already have this stuff it is a no brainer.

Reliability wise from what I've seen and read both the turbos are as reliable as anything else, probably don't have the same quality control as a garret, but you don't see random failures like cheap generic china stuff that has very porous casting and other average stuff.

how so?

have you tried one yourself?

The only T3 IWG they do is a 12cm, which is a little lazzier than I most of us seem to want.

It also has a 3 bolt outlet which blocks the WG path... There is also an open version (same thing with the rear cut off) which I think fixes the problem bar that of the 12cm.

Keep in mind MHI seem to like smaller housings, 12cm is more 3L suitable. If they were TS evo housings that is a different game all together.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...