Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Do we have any results here from this turbo? http://www.ebay.com....#ht_2463wt_1139

Same wheels and covers as all the T67-25g results... Only difference being the anti-surge cover (which may or may not make any difference) and the size of the shaft which should make no difference.

Ratio works as follows as we work back from the large engine will small turbo scenario.

48psi in exh manifold and only 10psi in inlet manifold works out to a ratio of 4.8:1 in theory if we were to try and get the same 48psi of back pressure in the exhaust manifold on the 2l we would need to have 32psi on the intake based on the 1.5:1 ratio (derived from testing).

ahh ok now I get ya, I was reading it wrong.. :thumbsup:

Same wheels and covers as all the T67-25g results... Only difference being the anti-surge cover (which may or may not make any difference) and the size of the shaft which should make no difference.

thats not what she said :P

I don't think it will make anymore power than it did before..

Possibly spool a little earlier and feel better/faster through the midrange though.How's your compression, holding up alright, have u gone new valve springs as well as cams?

Lies 600hp or bust! :yes:

If it went another 10-20hp up top and 20-30 through midrange I'll be happy... Hoping that 20psi will be similar to my old high boost without cams.

No valve springs, mine have been fine up till now.

Compression tests are for nancies :whistling:

Edited by SimonR32

I went to run cams without the valve springs but a few people scared me out of it without horror stories :/

Mine were fitted up this week with the springs and will be tuned possibly Monday, Good luck with yours!!! Hope the cams do make that sort of improvement!!!

The kando should be similar to 3076 yeah? I think thats what i read in your thread?

566hp at 1.7 bar (422kw) without correction

515hp at 1.3 bar (384kw) without correction

So it made an extra 40hp and we didn't even push it as hard, comes on about 350rpm sooner as well. I'll post up graphs tomorrow at work :)

also 590hp at 1.7 bar (440kw) with correction LOL

Edited by SimonR32

566hp at 1.7 bar (422kw) without correction

515hp at 1.3 bar (384kw) without correction

So it made an extra 40hp and we didn't even push it as hard, comes on about 350rpm sooner as well. I'll post up graphs tomorrow at work :)

also 590hp at 1.7 bar (440kw) with correction LOL

Woah!!! :O

Congrats on the results! Amazing!!!

Lies 600hp or bust! :yes:

If it went another 10-20hp up top and 20-30 through midrange I'll be happy... Hoping that 20psi will be similar to my old high boost without cams.

No valve springs, mine have been fine up till now.

Compression tests are for nancies :whistling:

love how this man thinks! nice power dude, 140mph here u come!

For those who mentioned getting poncams, i used a guy in the US that delivered a set for my NEO for about $625 or something..... So they are certainly great value for money based on the results above..... Not sure what they sell for locally but if anyone wants the details i can go find them :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...