Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Great work...do the before and after graphs use the same ramp rates etc as the power curve with the cams seems to do a bit of darting around at the start and plays catch up to the std cam curve. Not doubting the result, as the cams do seem to make comfortably more grunt, just trying to understand if the cams actually allow comfortably more grunt at 3,000 & 3,500rpm which seems real surprising

Wow T67 and 3076 are pretty mirrored power wise but the T67 makes more torque, very interesting. Is the T67 something you could use in a street car? Or to laggy? The TD06 be better? I had sold my self on a TD06 but thinking T67 now for more potential in the future.

Great work...do the before and after graphs use the same ramp rates etc as the power curve with the cams seems to do a bit of darting around at the start and plays catch up to the std cam curve. Not doubting the result, as the cams do seem to make comfortably more grunt, just trying to understand if the cams actually allow comfortably more grunt at 3,000 & 3,500rpm which seems real surprising

Same ramp rate. Probably different start RPM but if anything the standard cam curve should have an advantage. It's all fair and reasonable testing, we were all surprised how well it all worked.

Boost was on heaps earlier so there was a fair bit more boost between 3000-3500rpm which helps make the extra grunt.

Same ramp rate. Probably different start RPM but if anything the standard cam curve should have an advantage. It's all fair and reasonable testing, we were all surprised how well it all worked.

Boost was on heaps earlier so there was a fair bit more boost between 3000-3500rpm which helps make the extra grunt.

:thumbsup: Oh well, lets hope Tomei have done their homework with the Poncams on the Rb20. I am not expecting anything near your result as franly I will be amazed if the 20G can flow any more then the 306rwkws its currently flowing

Wow T67 and 3076 are pretty mirrored power wise but the T67 makes more torque, very interesting. Is the T67 something you could use in a street car? Or to laggy? The TD06 be better? I had sold my self on a TD06 but thinking T67 now for more potential in the future.

looks like the t67 would be just like the 3076 on the street , until about 3500rpm where the 67 walks away by 25~ hp :P . That sort of power in a little rwd 32 would be a handful at the best of times! 120klm/h in 5th gear would get interesting real quick!

Lol i don't intend to run a high comp motor much longer, so knowing 8cm works well on an SR means I'd rather chase the response

Status can feel free to comment now lol

Other options are 3071, 3040 and FP3073 in no particular order. FP is 2 grand worth, the others id aim to buy used under a grand or kando it

so whats goin on with the motor..?

Doing a quick rebuild on my DET. Luckily the person I sold it to determined it was to far for for his looking and brought it back.

Basic built etc. Haven't you seen FB?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...so a "development" here aswell The swap is "done" and car went "test drive" BUT it seems the clutch(maybe gearbox?) is a little bit sad? I bought this clutch kit https://justjap.com/products/xtreme-heavy-duty-organic-clutch-flywheel-kit-nissan-skyline-r31-r32-r33-push-type "Problem" is that the first gear is hard to put into and it seems that the clutch is not disengaged. It was not the problem with the old clutch...(or like sometime the first gear would not get as easy specialy when the fluid was cold) So? Can it be like...bad "install" or is the clutch wrong ((it should not have been) i done research to get the right one) Or is this "normal" with new clutch and needs to be break in? 
    • @Duncan I can try  and thanks i did not thought about VIN and part numbers for 33/34. @GTSBoy yeah it looks like iam gonna do that  
    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
×
×
  • Create New...