Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I been thinking of going T67 on NZ manifold and 44mm gate on my 34 too but realized I have to re-route my cross over intake pipe, BOV and all the associated hoses and sensors, what a headfk job..The typical U layout cooler pipes will foul any highmount turbos.. Man would have loved a T67 but too much pain, unless theres better ways..will stick with the TD06 for now

Im doing it, a headfk yes, but worth it. Piping wont be to bad.

I been thinking of going T67 on NZ manifold and 44mm gate on my 34 too but realized I have to re-route my cross over intake pipe, BOV and all the associated hoses and sensors, what a headfk job..The typical U layout cooler pipes will foul any highmount turbos.. Man would have loved a T67 but too much pain, unless theres better ways..will stick with the TD06 for now

Headfk job lol... man hypergear turbos are made for people like you! still a fair bit of mucking around with the TD06..

Do a T67 with a 3" front cover and low mount it.

If you check Roy's for sale thread he has a TD06H-25G that uses a 3" front cover that is normally native to the 20G we get from Kando. Thats a GENUINE TRUST item...........

If trust used the 3" cover on a 25G wheel, it cant honestly be that much worse. Maybe need a psi or 2 extra to reach the same targets. Best of both worlds mate.

I guess roughly the same response if not a TINY bit better and an easy 300kw low mounted (stock mani) on 98.

The T67 and TD06SH-25G both use the 4" cover. The 20G and 18G use the 3" cover in the Trust range

The T67 and TD06SH-25G both use the 4" cover. The 20G and 18G use the 3" cover in the Trust range

When I read ur for sale thread it definitely looked like the SH had a 3" cover, tell me I'm seeing things?!

Right you are, my bad!

I think it was coz it had the knob chopped off that fooled me. Thanks for posting that.

I still think the 3" .60 cover wouldnt be THAT bad for it. It should still work.

ok heres my crappy edit and ideas..

now the problem running t67 on stock manifold is size yeah and the need for a 30mm or bigger spacer..but if we flip it upside down you should have more room to play with and maybe only a 20mm spacer required..but i need to know the length of

A red arrows

B green arrows..

t67final.png

its still not going to be great but its an idea that could work yeah..

Can't you just make a small manifold adapter and move the compressor housing over a bit? You would need a converter from split T3 to the 3 bolt anyway wouldn't you?

You after some more powerz Artz?

So is it the strut tower that fowls the large compressor housing of the T67? 30mm is a huge spacer btw, assuming you need at least that much to clear the engine block/ rocker cover bottom edge..

No. The compressor housing would foul on the exhaust mani, hence the need for such a large spacer. How the hell do you think it could foul on the block/rocker covers lol?

Edited by Hanaldo

no the comp cover hits on the exhaust manifold Ron you need a spacer on most turbos to clear this...

nah Scott I got more than enough powers mate....I just have a bored brain....:/

Anyway T67 on a stock manifold is a crappy idea....whos idea was it anyway... :domokun:

No. The compressor housing would foul on the exhaust mani, hence the need for such a large spacer. How the hell do you think it could foul on the block/rocker covers lol?

Lookin at too many pictures, the non pornographic ones..

My TDO6SL2-20G T3 8cm external gate is getting closer to running. Just fitted the Bosch 1000cc injectors. Still to fit the injector loom plugs, Turbosmart FPR and lines then off to get the pipe work done, then tune.

Has the engine been built? Very clean inside compared to most SR tractor motors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...