Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

3540 shaft snapped in half and the Kando cost less than just a core for the garrett.

essencially the same engine apart from new injectors, rochester 1000's and a the T67, it is spooling up heaps earlier than the 3540, around 1000-1500 rpm earlier which makes me think its the housing.

thats quite early but i think the 8cm would be even earlier.

take a few photos of the rear housing, i am fairly confident i can tell the difference. Take pics from around the flange area.

im fairly certain that a 10cm housing has more of a taper on the exit side of the T3 flange than it does on the CHRA side, whereas an 8cm has the same amount of taper from the flange on both sides and the snail shell is a little thinner.

This is my observation but im not honestly sure this is correct!

The genuine garrett .82 will be better suited. The .73 (10cm) kando housing is a tiny thing.

There are also better options available for that sort of power when talking 'responsive' and 400kw on a dirty thirty. Bare in mind a 35R is similar in size to a precision 6262.

A bush bearing PT can be had for roughly 1k delivered, and would be a hands down winner if you went for the T4 TS option. Single gate to keep costs low will still work a treat.

Finally here is a couple of pics of my turbo housing, i think it is a 10cm but it is just too small for my 25/26 with cams. We ended up getting 275RWKW out of it at 20psi on BP ultimate. It spools up to full song at 3500 and starts to drop off around 6000. It is very good to drive but we were pretty disappointed at the power output.

post-2388-0-18249500-1353379281_thumb.jpg

post-2388-0-39146500-1353379290_thumb.jpg

Simon, i suggest waiting to see how i go before getting the T67.

Finally here is a couple of pics of my turbo housing, i think it is a 10cm but it is just too small for my 25/26 with cams. We ended up getting 275RWKW out of it at 20psi on BP ultimate. It spools up to full song at 3500 and starts to drop off around 6000. It is very good to drive but we were pretty disappointed at the power output.

post-2388-0-18249500-1353379281_thumb.jpg

post-2388-0-39146500-1353379290_thumb.jpg

Simon, i suggest waiting to see how i go before getting the T67.

Worst pictures ever haha But I think it's a 10cm by the looks

In that case I can almost guarantee you something is wrong with your set up and not the turbo... These things don't drop off at high revs, we went well past 8000rpm with mine and power was still going north.

You are about 50rwkw down on where you should be... Got a graph?

Looking for a Kando for my 26/30. Has anyone got any thoughts on this? Basically a 3582r with .73 rear housing. Want to make a responsive 400 rwkw http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com.au/viewitem?itemId=120892863434

Hey Simon, I got a Kando TD06H-25g with the biggest houseing they make on my neo 25/30. It's not tuned above 5000rpm cos I need to replace my wastegate ( I'm not doing it untill my new 4wd arrives). To compare I had a Hypergear Gt3576 that made about 370rwhp on Ultimate 98 on Hyperdrive's dyno (In WA). With my rev limit set at 4500rpm I think I could safely say that the new kando turbo is massivly more powerful and massively more responsive.

I have herd of people running T67's on 3L's but I honestly reckon that it would be happier with the slightly bigger TD06H-25G.

But that all being said my car isn't fully tuned so I ahve no idea when it will stop making power.

The genuine garrett .82 will be better suited. The .73 (10cm) kando housing is a tiny thing.

There are also better options available for that sort of power when talking 'responsive' and 400kw on a dirty thirty. Bare in mind a 35R is similar in size to a precision 6262.

A bush bearing PT can be had for roughly 1k delivered, and would be a hands down winner if you went for the T4 TS option. Single gate to keep costs low will still work a treat.

i know nothing about the PT turbos.. just did some reading up on them.. looks to be the goods! might go with a 6262 i reckon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • it was good to see our presence at GTR festival..hope to see more SAU at these events 
    • This is awesome.     
    • Thanks for the quick replies guys its appreciated. A small extension was welded onto the standard 6boost external gate pipe which you can see where the pipe goes from black to stainless just below and to the right of the rear housing in the first picture. Overall I would say the flow is pretty good other than 6boosts choice to come straight off the collector at a decent angle.. Not sure why I went with two valves, I originally replaced the stock twin bovs with the GFB when I had the twins on. When I purchased the EFR it came with the Turbosmart Kompact BOV so I figured that would be a better option than the stock EFR Bov. I don't believe the Turbosmart BOV is adjustable? When I get the spike and then sudden dip in boost pressure, the turbo speed does drop as well. Stock head size wise however I believe it has Neo Turbo springs and a Neo Turbo intake camshaft and an aftermarket exhaust camshaft in the vicinity of 260 degrees. We didn't try a different MAC valve, we tried two different ways of plumbing it and we also tried removing the mac valve entirely and just having the boost source from the turbo directly connected to the wastegate and it still spiked / dropped and exhibited the same behaviour. Standard R33 GTR 5 speed tansmission. I'm running a Haltech Elite 2500 and can provide some logs if you. I understand what you're saying in that it looks like an auto plot however no, it's still a manual and it just has a lot of torque down low, for all intents and purposes it's a very impressive street car. I've attached a photo of the quickbitz dyno plot which was when the only difference is I was running -5 twin turbos with a mac valve. As you can see theres a decent dip in AFRs between 125kmh and 135kmh. Our problem now is not that the AFRs are dropping, just the boost pressure is dropping, however it is evident in the same RPM range of the map, coincidentally or not.
    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
×
×
  • Create New...