Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I need help turbo experts.

In a Kando Dynamics what would turbo would be comparable with a T04Z 1.06ish A/R? I'm terrible with this stuff so please be kind.

Cheers :)

I need help turbo experts.

In a Kando Dynamics what would turbo would be comparable with a T04Z 1.06ish A/R? I'm terrible with this stuff so please be kind.

Cheers :)

T04/66 P-trim..i reckon they even did one with a 1.00, last time i checked

they sell them as T04S/T04R with 84mm compressor wheel

Edited by jet_r31

T04/66 P-trim..i reckon they even did one with a 1.00, last time i checked

they sell them as T04S/T04R with 84mm compressor wheel

Yep, the one that Artz linked is what I came up with as well.

I think we're onto a winner! :D

A Freddy plenum isn't really going to help much either..the stock one can handle anything a td06 20g can throw at it....probably make better torque too..also if you get the right ecu you won't need a boost controller ;)

I forgot to add that i am running a apexi power FC with hand controller, i know the freddy plenum wasnt the smartest move but i did it to tidy up the engine bay until a fab up my own one...eventually.

So in your opinions would the anti surge be more beneficial as opposed to the non anti surge TD06 20G?

I forgot to add that i am running a apexi power FC with hand controller, i know the freddy plenum wasnt the smartest move but i did it to tidy up the engine bay until a fab up my own one...eventually.

So in your opinions would the anti surge be more beneficial as opposed to the non anti surge TD06 20G?

well if you already have a freddy its fine, i just thought to save some coin if you were planning a build.. . :thumbsup:

seems non anti surge is the go, mine works fine without it anyway...have you considered a T67?? seems your all set up for it...

If you lay the charts over each other there is nothing in it..tdo6 has a little more torque downlow but if you are already top mounting may as well go t67 its a killer...see hypergear he has a new billet job too should be even better..

If you lay the charts over each other there is nothing in it..tdo6 has a little more torque downlow but if you are already top mounting may as well go t67 its a killer...see hypergear he has a new billet job too should be even better..

Hmm well this just made things a whole lot more difficult to decide hah, is there dyno graphs on this topic for both the turbos'?

i wouldnt mind seeing them to compare, of course the graphs would have to be based on RB25DET, with relatively similar mods. i have been looking but cant really seem to find them.

Yeh I'd be taking a hypergear option over a kando if I was looking today... Have a look at the SS2 ex gate results, it seems to make the power earlier on then fall off around 6500 where as the T67 dosen't seem to reach full potential until 7500 and beyond.. so realistically for a car with a stock rev limit I think the hypergear is the smarter option??

Kando is cheaper I think? but you get much better service before and after sale with the hypergear.

I emailed Kando about a non anti surge housing, suprised i got an email back after i was told i was blocked after leaving neautral feedback. $175 delivered, in stock now, i'll order one and do a comparrison.

I just bought a billet t67 of Stao with his own comp wheels profile. Must sell my previous setup to fund the new one lol. some one buy it

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/416349-td06-20g-l2-complete-turbo-setup-for-rb25-290kw-setup/

anyone used the billet comp wheeled t67 yet im purchasing a new core is it worth the extra 200 ???

Yeh before and after graphs are in here somewhere... Hard to say if it did anything cause I put in poncams at the same time, boost didn't come on any earlier so I'd say pass. Maybe you could get it at half price if you ask him to fit it before sending.

Hard to say if it did anything cause I put in poncams at the same time, boost didn't come on any earlier so I'd say pass.

It seems that the benefit of billet compressor design is in improved efficiency at higher PR, not in dramatically reduced boost response times. Still be interesting to try them back to back if only to see whether response and power delivery is any more/less progressive.

I'd say unless you are planning on running 20+psi stick with the std comp wheel. For my money I would be asking about the thrust bearing - seem to recall spotting a "race" upgrade to 360 degree version in the Kamak catalogue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...