Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guyz, i am planning on picking up an Walbro fuel pump for my car and just wanted to know which is the one i should buy for my car which is bolt on and fits fine to an R34 GTT, i am a bit confused between the GSS 341 and the GSS 342??

Thanks Guyz!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348153-walbro-gss-341-or-342/
Share on other sites

I'd only Get a Nismo/Tomei on an S14/S15/R33/R34. The Warlbro sock is on a 90 degree andgle but it needs to be 45. Same prob with a Bosch 040. Mounts on a 45 degree angle so won't pick up low fuel levels well at all.

I HATE spending money I don't have to but I do strongly think it's necessary unless U wanna only use 3/4 of your fuel tank.

Isn't the difference between 341 and 342 whether the inlet is on the right or left side?

As far as running out of petrol? I've never had an issue with my walbro (342). I installed it myself on a empty tank that the needle was at the line (not on the line - level with the empty line) - no issue from very first prime! I've been below the line several times. Filled with 55L and still didn't have problems.

who is dumb enough to "GIVE" it some on a windy hilly road with it dead on empty? cmon be realistic here.. also im the same as simpletool, installed walbro pump and i have no dramas running it right down near the empty line

Ok so from the above posts im gathering that both the GSS 341 and the GSS 342 will fit, any differences in fitting or using them?

Im not buying it from Australia thats why i want to know exact details before i buy it... So the 341 or 342??

A walbro is perfect for an S13 or R32 because the bracket is vertical. S14/R33 and later go on a 45 degree angle riiiiight down in there, causing the sock to angle 45 degrees upward. I guess u could work something out to make the sock sit a bit flatter.

Edited by bradsm87

I'd only Get a Nismo/Tomei on an S14/S15/R33/R34. The Warlbro sock is on a 90 degree andgle but it needs to be 45. Same prob with a Bosch 040. Mounts on a 45 degree angle so won't pick up low fuel levels well at all.

I HATE spending money I don't have to but I do strongly think it's necessary unless U wanna only use 3/4 of your fuel tank.

Yeah this, I got a 342 in my rb20det hr31 and any less than 1/4 a tank if you booted it around a corner it would fuel starve, not an issue with a stock pump or other pumps, you can probably modify the sock but it was a massive pain in the ass for me.

Edited by Rolls

A walbro is perfect for an S13 or R32 because the bracket is vertical. S14/R33 and later go on a 45 degree angle riiiiight down in there, causing the sock to angle 45 degrees upward. I guess u could work something out to make the sock sit a bit flatter.

My R33 has a vertical bracket.

Ok so from the above posts im gathering that both the GSS 341 and the GSS 342 will fit, any differences in fitting or using them?

Im not buying it from Australia thats why i want to know exact details before i buy it... So the 341 or 342??

Like I said 341. if you specify the vehicle you can get the most appropriate fitting kit.

you know the r33 sock of the stock fuel pump fits directly onto the walbro.

I've had a walbro in two of my 33's and an s14, each time I've used the factory sock as it's longer and sits at the right angle.

Just some food for though ;)

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...