Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

glad I don't have them in there rear of mine it shits me enough with just the fronts when people walk past at intersections. In Sydney f**ks pull up behind you so close I'd be murdering people all day if I had rear ones lol [emoji380][emoji380]

Aren't rears normally disabled when moving forwards? Unless they're being used for blindspot avoidance I guess.

I'd rather a camera...

I guess but you would think the front ones would be disabled when reversing then but that's not the case! Well not in mine any ways..... Yeah I love my rear camera over beepers any day!

  • Like 1

Finally got around to doing the brake cut mod yesterday. Confirmed with my greddy informeter. Throttle 35% factory and much higher with switch off. I did notice WOT was only 78% does that sound right??

Finally got around to doing the brake cut mod yesterday. Confirmed with my greddy informeter. Throttle 35% factory and much higher with switch off. I did notice WOT was only 78% does that sound right??

78% is normal. You can scale it so it reads 100%, but I can't remember how.

  • Like 1

Installled new head unit. Working well and much better sound.

What connector is that? it was connected in the old head unit

Yes steering wheel control plug . Previous owner of my stag had it all working to a degree i replaced headunit and have since lost all controls

  • Like 1

bolt on Dolphin intake pipe from JP

:rolleyes::rolleyes:

attachicon.gifIMG_1680.JPG

attachicon.gifIMG_1686.JPG

attachicon.gifIMG_1688.JPG

attachicon.gifIMG_1687.JPG

Problem with this kit is it replaces the pipe that already flows well. The gains are from replacing the lower pipe.

Problem with this kit is it replaces the pipe that already flows well. The gains are from replacing the lower pipe.

I think it actually flows worse than the stock one. :P

  • Like 1

Steering wheel controls would have needed to be connected separate to the main loom (3wires) and head deck needs to be compatible with resistance based controls. After all is wired you need to teach the head deck what the controls do

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The team at OBD2 Australia are pretty good, shoot them an email and ask them. I've dealt with them before for work stuff. I'd be shocked if it didn't work, so long as Consult can activate the ABS. But you might need to use KLine for it which would be the stopper, as I don't think that piece does KLine comms.
    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
×
×
  • Create New...